Author

Topic: 💸  DigiCube  🔷  NOW ON RAWX (NEW MCXNOW)  💸  EARN 50K CUBE/WEEK WITH TWITTER! - page 255. (Read 460460 times)

hero member
Activity: 606
Merit: 500
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?

If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.

Yes

Ok, but...
If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything?

If your stake reward is less than 10 you would still earn the full amount. If it's over 10, it will be set to 10 in this example

Ok, i vote for option 1
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping  just my 2 cents tho

I like this thinking, large wallets will still find a way to stake full 2000% encouraging dumping.

Curb inflation by bringing the stake rate down ...

Not going to happen

Large wallets will either stake for the max or have to wait just as long as small wallets do for their inputs to stake if they choose to split down

(This change benefits small wallets, not large ones..)
sr. member
Activity: 332
Merit: 252
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping  just my 2 cents tho

I like this thinking, large wallets will still find a way to stake full 2000% encouraging dumping.

Curb inflation by bringing the stake rate down ...
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?

If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.

Yes

Ok, but...
If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything?

If your stake reward is less than 10 you would still earn the full amount. If it's over 10, it will be set to 10 in this example
hero member
Activity: 606
Merit: 500
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?

If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.

Yes

Ok, but...
If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything?
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?

If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.

Yes
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?

If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1001
Fucker of "the system"
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?



pos is very tricky there are many factors to consider
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?

"Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?"  good question
" if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? "   no-every stake would be a static reward of 10 i believe. the AMOUNT of stakes you would get would prob still be dependant on netweight (correct me if im wrong spots)   
think like a turbo-clams ;p haha im my eyes option 1 is anywayz ;p
sr. member
Activity: 332
Merit: 252
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)

Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?

so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours?  how does it maintain 2000%?
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation)
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1001
Fucker of "the system"
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping  just my 2 cents tho
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

imma option 1 kinda guy, just cause i think it curves supply long term a bit better than option 2 ;p
full member
Activity: 151
Merit: 100
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 2
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Offer escrow, receive negative trust
Has just one person received the stakestick so far?

My tacking number says it should arrive today, so hopefully I'll be updating this thread soon  Shocked
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Has just one person received the stakestick so far?
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 263
soonnn..

you only can STAKE CUBE on STAKESTICKS.

and then we're going to the MOONN

No, you'll always be able to use whatever operating system you choose

yaaahh...

we're not going to the moonn.
we're goint to the mountain  Sad Sad
Jump to: