💸 DigiCube 🔷 NOW ON RAWX (NEW MCXNOW) 💸 EARN 50K CUBE/WEEK WITH TWITTER! - page 254.

optnickr

member

Activity: 116

Merit: 12

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 07:57:35 PM

Quote from: johnnysof on January 26, 2016, 07:53:35 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 06:35:16 PM

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.

If every block staked for 100 (long-term talk), then it would be creating 288,000 new coins per day

after modifying the coin, we will have chance of losing everything we already have?

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: johnnysof on January 26, 2016, 07:53:35 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 06:35:16 PM

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.

If every block staked for 100 (long-term talk), then it would be creating 288,000 new coins per day

johnnysof

hero member

Activity: 534

Merit: 500

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 06:35:16 PM

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

I also think at least 1000 (probably 2k-3k). Think also in the long term. There is a limitation of blocks per day or month and if 100 or 1000 is fine today, difficulty will go up followed by weeks to get a stake and this would probably kill the coin.

ltcrstrbrt

legendary

Activity: 1572

Merit: 1057

100

optnickr

member

Activity: 116

Merit: 12

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 06:35:16 PM

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

minimum 10 maximum 1000

You need to have about 180Cubes to earn 10cubes, 1800 to earn 100cubes and 18kcubes to earn 1k.

yoman1289

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

1000

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

If anyone else thinks 100 is too low, please post here what your suggestion is. I am open to listen

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: optnickr on January 26, 2016, 05:57:46 PM

Quote from: johnnysof on January 26, 2016, 05:51:48 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 04:09:21 PM

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

split their coins into several inputs will breaking the wallet. the wallet not support many inputs!!!! don't know the max of splits you can do, but the max exists.

You can have hundreds of millions of inputs staking at once. It's only limited by your hardware, not the software

It would be very stupid to even approach a level that high without recombining, though

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: yoman1289 on January 26, 2016, 05:53:07 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 05:46:36 PM

Quote from: willowfoot on January 26, 2016, 05:44:56 PM

Quote from: optnickr on January 26, 2016, 05:40:43 PM

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! Cry

imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to..

More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it

So what you are saying is instead of coin controlling like we do now, we skip that and let the split stakes cap out? And the cap only applies to each split chain

Honestly 10 is way too low, and even 100 is pretty low. I might be okay with a 500 cap

I agree 10 is too low (and even 100 is a bit on the low side, too) but I wanted to put a low option in there. The problem is finding a good balance between incentive to stake and inflation. If I set it too high, coin count gets out of control. If I set it too low, nobody gives a shit because it doesn't stake for enough

optnickr

member

Activity: 116

Merit: 12

Quote from: johnnysof on January 26, 2016, 05:51:48 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 04:09:21 PM

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

split their coins into several inputs will breaking the wallet. the wallet not support many inputs!!!! don't know the max of splits you can do, but the max exists.

yoman1289

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 05:46:36 PM

Quote from: willowfoot on January 26, 2016, 05:44:56 PM

Quote from: optnickr on January 26, 2016, 05:40:43 PM

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! Cry

imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to..

More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it

So what you are saying is instead of coin controlling like we do now, we skip that and let the split stakes cap out? And the cap only applies to each split chain

Honestly 10 is way too low, and even 100 is pretty low. I might be okay with a 500 cap

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: johnnysof on January 26, 2016, 05:51:48 PM

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 04:09:21 PM

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

So what? That makes more competition for staking and will not stake at exactly 24 hours

You guys are assuming people are going to stake with 100% efficiency. Splitting blocks down that low will definitely curb compounding by a very significant amount..

johnnysof

hero member

Activity: 534

Merit: 500

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 04:09:21 PM

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I think those options would not change so much, just bring people to split their coins into several inputs.

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: willowfoot on January 26, 2016, 05:44:56 PM

Quote from: optnickr on January 26, 2016, 05:40:43 PM

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! Cry

imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

I don't think you guys are thinking this through. It auto-splits down. If you send to yourself and let it split for you until you are under the cap, the wallet will do that automatically for you as you stake the max until you are low enough. There is no reason to do it manually if you don't want to..

More inputs over the max = more stakes at the max until you get below it

willowfoot

sr. member

Activity: 332

Merit: 252

Quote from: optnickr on January 26, 2016, 05:40:43 PM

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! Cry

imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

yes, once the max CUBE is reached for staking, very little incentive to go out and buy more, since you wont be gaining any more stake reward.

optnickr

member

Activity: 116

Merit: 12

I vote for nothing or 1000 per block.... If put to 10 per block will be very crap.. cuz if I have 99.9k Cubes I will have to split it for 555x180 to receive just 10 for each block.... I will crash my wallet with 555 blocks of 180cubes, its a very bad idea!!!!! Cry

imagine if you had 1 million cubes!

>>
with 100k cubes you will stuck your wallet

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

If options 1 and 2 remain fairly close in the poll, I will compromise and do like 50 or something

mrsalve

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

Don't have twitter but I vote for option 2

iGotSpots

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1054

CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io

Quote from: iGotSpots on January 26, 2016, 04:09:21 PM

Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results

1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is

Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes

I set up a poll on Twitter, please use this to vote:

https://twitter.com/PurePoS/status/692093814857678848

Bitcoinmeister

hero member

Activity: 502

Merit: 500

"Highest ROI crypto infrastructure"

option 1

Topic: 💸 DigiCube 🔷 NOW ON RAWX (NEW MCXNOW) 💸 EARN 50K CUBE/WEEK WITH TWITTER! - page 254. (Read 460460 times)