Author

Topic: DNotes 2.0 - Staking, CRISP Interest, DNotes Pay - page 238. (Read 148868 times)

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1029

The press release is very impressive, and so is this:

It usually takes 2 or 3 days for one of DNotes' press releases to show up on Yahoo Finance and other mainstream websites, but this one has showed up already on both Yahoo and Nasdaq, before any of the cryptocurrency news sites!  Smiley

https://www.yahoo.com/news/dnotes-global-inc-announces-partnership-185000544.html
http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/dnotes-global-inc-announces-partnership-with-geneca-for-blockchain-technology-development-20171226-00265

I bet that explains the recent rise in DNotes' price. Great job!

And Merry Christmas to all!
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 102
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1060
can i find where is specifical of coin?

Welcome to DNotes, CoinMenX. All the information about DNotes can be found here: http://dnotescoin.com/

And our Roadmap is found here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dnotes-20-staking-crisp-interest-dnotes-pay-1924858
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
can i find where is specifical of coin?
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005

The press release is very impressive, and so is this:

It usually takes 2 or 3 days for one of DNotes' press releases to show up on Yahoo Finance and other mainstream websites, but this one has showed up already on both Yahoo and Nasdaq, before any of the cryptocurrency news sites!  Smiley

https://www.yahoo.com/news/dnotes-global-inc-announces-partnership-185000544.html
http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/dnotes-global-inc-announces-partnership-with-geneca-for-blockchain-technology-development-20171226-00265
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1060

DNotes Global, Inc. Announces Partnership with Geneca for Blockchain Technology Development

“We have been searching for the best possible firm to expand our development team for DNotes 2.0 and beyond, and we are proud to announce we have acquired the services of Geneca. Geneca shares both our business philosophy and our vision for making DNotes a technology leader, making them the ideal partner for our rapid expansion plans.”

That is right. Though our efforts intensified recently, we have spent the last two years looking at hundreds of potential software development firms. We never came across any we ranked above an  “A-“ grade. Geneca is our perfect “A+” They are exceptional and will go a long way in our success. The timing is perfect too.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 508
Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023
So, anyone have thoughts on the recent market crash? Are Futures Contracts causing instability? Market manipulation? Seems rather odd how quickly it happened and, how deeply. Also odd how one commercial trader predicted it almost exactly...


There is a lot of politics in the background of course, but honestly a crash was imminent anyway. Bitcoin is a constantly uptrending roller coaster. And a roller coaster sometimes goes a little down to then go up even faster. Bitcoin will recover regardless of Roger Ver and the crap he is talking all day.

I'm going to have to disagree with your roller-coaster metaphor dzonikg28, but stand with you on your intended points. In fact, I'm going to go a step further. Roger Ver is talking about the weaknesses of bitcoin and this seems to be hurting its value. The more the large holders and miners see value being hurt by disfunctionality in bitcoin, the more they are likely to support genuine improvements to its code. And the more the code behind bitcoin improves, and the more useful bitcoin is, the higher its true value can climb.

As for futures contracts and commercial traders manipulating the price, I think it is unlikely. I have no doubt that given the skill and opportunity, they would certainly do it. And I imagine that the current low is a great time for them to buy a reserve to sell futures against. I just don't think they've got what it takes to pull it off. But that doesn't mean there hasn't been an incidental effect. It is hard for the whales to cash-out a significant amount without impacting the price. But selling a chunk to futures traders is a good opportunity and it is possible that taking advantage of that has hit the price a little.

This article from a couple of days ago talks about the concept:
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-12-21/bitcoin-billionaires-may-have-found-a-way-to-cash-out

But I'm most comfortable putting it down to the range of complex influences that have caused previous dips in prices. Some of it might be algorithmic trading. Maybe after watching it climb fast, unreasonable expectations have made the slight slowdown seem worrisome. Possibly the fact that bitcoin has attracted many inexperienced investors to try their hand means the market is more emotional and reactive than more standard types of investments. Maybe the weather has more to do with the price of bitcoin than its functionality does. How about Christmas putting a pinch on budgets causing investors to cash in despite a drop in price? If the Christmas budget theory is correct, maybe we can expect a leap in price as people invest their cash presents where they'd never risk money earned through hard work.

So the only thing I know for sure is that Jamie Dimon is green with jealousy that the market ignored him, but reacts when Roger Ver goes public. But you've got to be enjoying the media circus that spends a month calling bitcoin a bubble, and then when the price dips, writes pages speculating about what strange thing could have interrupted such a strong climb.

I am very confident that the Bitcoin protocol will evolve into the direction that society wants it to. Scalability issues will be tackled. The roller coaster metaphor was more related to how network effects enfold in networks that involve money. While for a messaging app there is nothing to lose if you join a network and (generally) no incentive to leave the network. You don't see Facebook have 100 mil users one day, 50 mil users the next day and 300 mil users the day after. It rather is growing very constantly/exponentially until you reach a certain level of saturation. There is no herd behavior in an economic sense or FUD. With Bitcoin/cryptocurrency/markets in general, network effects work differently because there are financial incentives involved. Bitcoin will "crash" and "pump" in monetary terms, but I am certain that the overall trend line for the user base will keep growing very constantly. I am aware that some people left BTC and joined some other project/coin, but many of the big (institutional) players will most likely focus on Bitcoin in the first place and that in turn creates an incentive to stay in Bitcoin after all for a loooong time.
member
Activity: 171
Merit: 10
Hope everyone had a good Christmas holiday.


Here is a situation worth keeping an eye on, as it is a reflection of Bitcoins lack of scalability:

Average confirmation time hit as high as 1416 minutes yesterday.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-confirmation-time?timespan=30days

It also appears as though every block is completely full.
https://blockchain.info/blocks/1514164923044
https://blockchain.info/blocks/1514078523044
Brandon, that 1,416 minutes sounds really bad, and it is just under twenty-four hours. So I looked up the times for bank transfers over Christmas just to compare. Turns out that a bitcoin transaction only takes between 16–25% of the time taken by the banks. Times vary but bank transfers sit between 4–6 days.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/payment-processing-takes-christmas-break-20111219-1p1xg.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/expat-money/8860887/Christmas-is-coming-but-whats-the-best-way-to-transfer-money-abroad-in-time-for-the-festivities.html

And while you're right that bitcoin is a long way from meeting a daily transaction needs, you've made me wonder if other cryptocurrencies are missing out on the poor performance criticism only because their systems are under less load.

Over the last year, bitcoin transactions per day peaked at 490,644 on December 14.
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions

So I grabbed some other data to compare it with and found that bitcoin was the second highest with Ethereum managing more than three times as many transactions per hour. This is impressive considering that the Ethereum network is also running a lot of other processes through its in-built programming language.

What I get from this little dig around is that the only reason for bitcoin not meeting the current demand is design decisions that determine the bitcoin coding. The fact that decentralised consensus works at all is amazing and fantastic, but in the case of bitcoin, it appears to be failing the general community at this stage. And I'm left wondering if the main cause of this is that it is not community consensus anymore. Instead it is the consensus of a few massive mining operations who seem to carry a lot more weight than the few community nodes mining away on their personal computer.



I agree that inability to achieve consensus in direction has been a major detriment to Bitcoin, plaguing it for years now. There has likely been hundreds of thousands of man hours wasted, developing implementations and code that ended up being scrapped.

When a group of nodes start running a different version of the software, this creates a fork with the exact same transaction history and balances that existed prior to the fork, but moving forward each would operate independently. How miners play their part in deciding which is the predominant blockchain, is by processing transactions; because if there were no miners, transactions would not be processed. Less supported blockchains are also much more susceptible to a 51% attack, especially if there are some large players or groups with massive hashing power capabilities in the given algorithm.

Theoretically, the majority of nodes could be running a version of Bitcoin with larger block sizes, but the majority of miners may still be more inclined to run the original and continue to process full blocks because there are more transaction fees (1000+tx/block @ $30 average tx fee).

When it comes down to it, even the little guy can still play a part in deciding the future direction of Bitcoin. On the Bitcoin network, a node is a node. Given that there are less than 12,000 nodes at this moment (most in data centers), a collaborative effort could still easily be mounted by ordinary people to implement new code more conducive to scaling Bitcoin. But if the miners are not incentivized enough to make the switch, does this really solve any problems? This argument has been going on for what seems like an eternity in the industry, and no ground has been made to break the stalemate.
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
Professional cryptocurrency writer incl DNotes.
Hope everyone had a good Christmas holiday.


Here is a situation worth keeping an eye on, as it is a reflection of Bitcoins lack of scalability:

Average confirmation time hit as high as 1416 minutes yesterday.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-confirmation-time?timespan=30days

It also appears as though every block is completely full.
https://blockchain.info/blocks/1514164923044
https://blockchain.info/blocks/1514078523044
Brandon, that 1,416 minutes sounds really bad, and it is just under twenty-four hours. So I looked up the times for bank transfers over Christmas just to compare. Turns out that a bitcoin transaction only takes between 16–25% of the time taken by the banks. Times vary but bank transfers sit between 4–6 days.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/payment-processing-takes-christmas-break-20111219-1p1xg.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/expat-money/8860887/Christmas-is-coming-but-whats-the-best-way-to-transfer-money-abroad-in-time-for-the-festivities.html

And while you're right that bitcoin is a long way from meeting a daily transaction needs, you've made me wonder if other cryptocurrencies are missing out on the poor performance criticism only because their systems are under less load.

Over the last year, bitcoin transactions per day peaked at 490,644 on December 14.
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions

So I grabbed some other data to compare it with and found that bitcoin was the second highest with Ethereum managing more than three times as many transactions per hour. This is impressive considering that the Ethereum network is also running a lot of other processes through its in-built programming language.

What I get from this little dig around is that the only reason for bitcoin not meeting the current demand is design decisions that determine the bitcoin coding. The fact that decentralised consensus works at all is amazing and fantastic, but in the case of bitcoin, it appears to be failing the general community at this stage. And I'm left wondering if the main cause of this is that it is not community consensus anymore. Instead it is the consensus of a few massive mining operations who seem to carry a lot more weight than the few community nodes mining away on their personal computer.

member
Activity: 171
Merit: 10
We have been searching for the best possible firm to expand our development team for DNotes 2.0 and beyond, and we are proud to announce we have acquired the services of Geneca. Geneca shares both our business philosophy and our vision for making DNotes a technology leader, making them the ideal partner for our rapid expansion plans.

A little background on Geneca:

"19 years ago, Geneca was born as a technology consulting firm, fueled by the conviction that technology investments are judged by the business benefit it delivers.  Which means, since the day we opened our doors, we have been pushing ourselves to not only meet but exceed our client’s expectations.

Our philosophy is that by aligning with our clients goals, ideas, and delivering transparency throughout a project, we will accurately capture the essence of your product and bring it to life.

Due to our longevity within the software industry, we have established a secure foundation which has allowed us to be innovated thinkers and expects in our field.  We bring a type of simplicity when developing a product due to our team being able to communicate effectively on both a technology and business level.  By speaking fluently within both areas, we are able to connect the two concepts insuring that our clients are receiving a product that will work while advancing their business.

Throughout this process, we are not just building a product we are also building a partnership.  By collaborating with our clients, we work toward one goal of building a successful software product not just billing hours.  Due to this, we have a 92% success rate (on-time and on-budget) on the projects we deliver.

Our Mission
To help our clients stay ahead of their competition by pushing the boundaries of what is possible with advanced strategy and cutting-edge technology.

Our Vision
Use software to create something extraordinary from something ordinary. To do that, we have to be MORE than a technology company. We have to be THE place to go to turn a big idea into big business impact."



Company details:

Website
http://www.geneca.com

Headquarters
Oak Brook, IL

Year founded
1998

Company type
Privately Held

Company size
51-200 employees

Here are just a few of the articles they have written on their blog:
https://www.geneca.com/blog/a-shared-language-why-you-need-one-how-to-create-it
https://www.geneca.com/blog/5-ways-to-build-a-strong-cultu
https://www.geneca.com/blog/walk-softly-and-carry-a-big-catalogue
https://www.geneca.com/blog/truly-inspirational-leaders-can-dodge-raindrops
https://www.geneca.com/blog/5-questions-to-determine-if-your-culture-motivates-millennials
https://www.geneca.com/blog/to-find-and-retain-more-customers-think-like-a-software-company

They are also product focused, which means they understand deadlines and realize the need for coordination with the rest of the business. To accomplish these goals, they have developed a set of amazing tools to keep everything on track and everyone on the same page, as well as provide a means for measuring progress and early detection when things may not be going as planned in order to make adjustments as needed.

With the addition of Geneca, there is an adjustment in the development of DNotes 2.0 and our priority for full C# conversion has been degraded to ensure we can meet our goals and time lines in Q1 2018.

Geneca has met and exceeded our expectations, and is without a shadow of a doubt the perfect fit for us and a mutually beneficial relationship with DNotes Global, Inc.

Amazing. I've done a bit of research on Geneca and am impressed, they've worked with some highly reputable organizations. This partnership is a huge step in taking DNotes to the next level.
member
Activity: 171
Merit: 10
Hope everyone had a good Christmas holiday.


Here is a situation worth keeping an eye on, as it is a reflection of Bitcoins lack of scalability:

Average confirmation time hit as high as 1416 minutes yesterday.
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-confirmation-time?timespan=30days

It also appears as though every block is completely full.
https://blockchain.info/blocks/1514164923044
https://blockchain.info/blocks/1514078523044
full member
Activity: 207
Merit: 100

Merry Christmas to the Forum, to the DNotes team, and to all and sundry in between!
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 102
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005


Okay, that artwork needs to be credited, it really made me smile. Great job. And Merry Christmas to all on this thread, you've made it such a pleasant place to hang out this year.


I agree, the artwork is beautiful. Merry Christmas everyone, and I hope you have a wonderful day! Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1060

I don't know whether someone has posted this or not, so ignore this if it is old news. The infrastructure at Bittrex wasn't capable of handling the rapid scaling of an onslaught of new users and had to shut down new account registrations (until further notice). My guess is that a lot of the exchanges are likely in the same boat.


New Account Sign Ups

December 15, 2017 10:21

Dear new users:

We have received an enormous number of new account registrations over the past few weeks.  We are excited to have so many new users who want to join the Bittrex community.  Unfortunately, we have to make a few upgrades to our support and backend systems to handle the increased traffic and load.  As such, we have halted new user registrations for the time being.  If you already have an account on Bittrex, you will not be affected by this change.  Please continue to the log in as you normally do.

To our new users, we will keep you posted on when we open up registration.  We apologize for the inconvenience!

The Bittrex Team


https://support.bittrex.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003463331

I really respect what Bittrex did here. They had the choice of increasing their current customer base by accepting new applications, or they could maintain the quality of service for their existing customer base and accept the fact that this will mean turning away new customers. They chose to put existing customers first and maintain their quality of service. I'd like to think that those who were turned away due to peak loads recognise the commitment to their customers that was demonstrated and come back to Bittrex when they've scaled up.

This is the sort of long-term vision that I see in DNotes Global Inc. and if these sorts of attitudes are embedded into the DNotes exchange, they will do well. I understand that the exchange is much further down the road map, but I'm sure that they're watching what both good and bad actors do, and learning from everything so that the DNotes exchange will benefit from this industry experience.

It is very demanding and costly to build a top notch exchange. We are committed to build our own and do it right. It will cost $ millions and may take a little longer. But that is a vital component of our fully integrated system. If I have my way, we will have the best customer services - something annoying lacking in our industry.

I also agree with what wiser has to say about customer support:
Good customer service is an absolute necessity, but tough to keep up with when you're growing rapidly. I think you have to over-hire tech support reps and consider it good when at times some of them are standing around doing nothing.

The great thing about the current labour market is that it is now so very easy to maintain a dormant workforce and outsource during peak times. The trick is already having in place a system for sorting and allocating tasks to the appropriate skill level. But even that can be largely automated now.

As for insightful comment by R-J-F recognising the value of moving with the times and trying things now even though they failed before:
In the new paradigm, if it didn't work yesterday, chances are it will tomorrow and that brings up the elephant in the room, accepting change as a good thing and making the most of it. Those who can do that will not only survive but thrive. Embrace new ideas and technology or perish. But above all else, don't be afraid to try a new way of doing things, it just might work better than you expect.

I'd like to plug that directly into R-J-F's later comment: "I can't help thinking what things might have been if we had less engineers and more marketing people who understood the customer relationship and the need for a live voice at the other end of the phone. " And suggest that with AI doing a great job of sorting types of issues and getting better at suggesting tech support responses, that some blended solution might soon be the most efficient way of meeting sudden peaks in customer support demands.

But whether it is security, or the voice of customer support, I believe the best way to approach all business decisions is remain focused on the desired outcome. Is it the voice they need to hear, or is it being able to instantly get the exact solution to their particular needs? Is top level security what is required, or do customers really just want to never lose their investment? DNotes Vault having access to matching funds is an example of thinking outside the box when determining security solutions that ensure customers will never lose. And if they continue with this outcome-focused approach when designing their exchange, it could really bring meeting customer needs to a whole new level.

"I believe the best way to approach all business decisions is remain focused on the desired outcome." Tim, you are correct. DNotes is result and vision oriented. We have a clearly articulated a vision of building a trusted digital currency that is accessible for everyone worldwide to participate. To realize that vision there many goal oriented missions. They are all time and outcome oriented, and as quantifiable as possible - when to do what, in order to achieve "?" by a certain date.

We study, strategize, plan, and execute; mindful that success in business is the result of “doing the right thing, the right way, at the right time.” This is consistent with everything that we do. Perhaps DNotes will be a great case study for business schools one day. Meanwhile, I hope that many entrepreneurs can learn from us.  
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1060
Bob,

Certainly. I will be there in May though there will not be as much the see. Daylilies start blooming in mid June with peak bloom in July. Also the new house will be still under construction in May and completed in June. However, I will be delighted to see you again anytime.

Merry Christmas to you and your family!

Alan
I'm sure Alan knows a lot more about the function of phytochrome in its role affecting circadian rhythms and the blooming of daylilies, but a quick search on the Internet seems to indicate that shortening the nights early with artificial light would work on this species, and give Bob a much better display when he arrives. Sure it would take some electricity, but less then a bitcoin mine requires.

Very funny, Tim. If you can join us too, I can make a special dish of daylily with circadian. LOL!

Merry Christmas!
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
Professional cryptocurrency writer incl DNotes.

I don't know whether someone has posted this or not, so ignore this if it is old news. The infrastructure at Bittrex wasn't capable of handling the rapid scaling of an onslaught of new users and had to shut down new account registrations (until further notice). My guess is that a lot of the exchanges are likely in the same boat.


New Account Sign Ups

December 15, 2017 10:21

Dear new users:

We have received an enormous number of new account registrations over the past few weeks.  We are excited to have so many new users who want to join the Bittrex community.  Unfortunately, we have to make a few upgrades to our support and backend systems to handle the increased traffic and load.  As such, we have halted new user registrations for the time being.  If you already have an account on Bittrex, you will not be affected by this change.  Please continue to the log in as you normally do.

To our new users, we will keep you posted on when we open up registration.  We apologize for the inconvenience!

The Bittrex Team


https://support.bittrex.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003463331

I really respect what Bittrex did here. They had the choice of increasing their current customer base by accepting new applications, or they could maintain the quality of service for their existing customer base and accept the fact that this will mean turning away new customers. They chose to put existing customers first and maintain their quality of service. I'd like to think that those who were turned away due to peak loads recognise the commitment to their customers that was demonstrated and come back to Bittrex when they've scaled up.

This is the sort of long-term vision that I see in DNotes Global Inc. and if these sorts of attitudes are embedded into the DNotes exchange, they will do well. I understand that the exchange is much further down the road map, but I'm sure that they're watching what both good and bad actors do, and learning from everything so that the DNotes exchange will benefit from this industry experience.

It is very demanding and costly to build a top notch exchange. We are committed to build our own and do it right. It will cost $ millions and may take a little longer. But that is a vital component of our fully integrated system. If I have my way, we will have the best customer services - something annoying lacking in our industry.

I also agree with what wiser has to say about customer support:
Good customer service is an absolute necessity, but tough to keep up with when you're growing rapidly. I think you have to over-hire tech support reps and consider it good when at times some of them are standing around doing nothing.

The great thing about the current labour market is that it is now so very easy to maintain a dormant workforce and outsource during peak times. The trick is already having in place a system for sorting and allocating tasks to the appropriate skill level. But even that can be largely automated now.

As for insightful comment by R-J-F recognising the value of moving with the times and trying things now even though they failed before:
In the new paradigm, if it didn't work yesterday, chances are it will tomorrow and that brings up the elephant in the room, accepting change as a good thing and making the most of it. Those who can do that will not only survive but thrive. Embrace new ideas and technology or perish. But above all else, don't be afraid to try a new way of doing things, it just might work better than you expect.

I'd like to plug that directly into R-J-F's later comment: "I can't help thinking what things might have been if we had less engineers and more marketing people who understood the customer relationship and the need for a live voice at the other end of the phone. " And suggest that with AI doing a great job of sorting types of issues and getting better at suggesting tech support responses, that some blended solution might soon be the most efficient way of meeting sudden peaks in customer support demands.

But whether it is security, or the voice of customer support, I believe the best way to approach all business decisions is remain focused on the desired outcome. Is it the voice they need to hear, or is it being able to instantly get the exact solution to their particular needs? Is top level security what is required, or do customers really just want to never lose their investment? DNotes Vault having access to matching funds is an example of thinking outside the box when determining security solutions that ensure customers will never lose. And if they continue with this outcome-focused approach when designing their exchange, it could really bring meeting customer needs to a whole new level.
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
Professional cryptocurrency writer incl DNotes.

Okay, that artwork needs to be credited, it really made me smile. Great job. And Merry Christmas to all on this thread, you've made it such a pleasant place to hang out this year.
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
Professional cryptocurrency writer incl DNotes.
Bob,

Certainly. I will be there in May though there will not be as much the see. Daylilies start blooming in mid June with peak bloom in July. Also the new house will be still under construction in May and completed in June. However, I will be delighted to see you again anytime.

Merry Christmas to you and your family!

Alan
I'm sure Alan knows a lot more about the function of phytochrome in its role affecting circadian rhythms and the blooming of daylilies, but a quick search on the Internet seems to indicate that shortening the nights early with artificial light would work on this species, and give Bob a much better display when he arrives. Sure it would take some electricity, but less then a bitcoin mine requires.
Jump to: