Topic: Do you believe in crypto ratings? - page 16. (Read 4226 times)
Ratings can't be the same for everybody, some will choose Bitcoin as first and others will choose altcoin as first on their lists, that's why I can't trust any one's rating or any website rating, we are different people with different opinions, some rates for money while others rates are based on their research
No, it will be hard to believe in some crypto ratings. Just like what you have shared, there are two different site that have their own rating towards bitcoin which has a different result. One makes bitcoin as the worst and another makes it the best. It only means that they are being manipulated based on their point of view towards crypto.
After I saw that Bitcoin has a bad rating in their database I concluded that this is paid promotion to hype coins they are supporting, how can you say that Bitcoin is the worst when it has a huge dominance in the market, the coins that they listed as leading cannot even get closer to Bitcoin's dominance in the market.
How they do it and their purpose of doing this for what. I do not know about the site CCID and WeissRating, for me it's like a fake ranking. In addition, they say that Bitcoin is very bad. But what I see today Bitcoin shows a constantly rising price, let alone this coin is priced at $9.276. Bitcoin and Ethereum are still on the number one and two. I am personally to date still using the site Coinmarketcap.com to monitor the conditions of Bitcoin and Altcoin.
Well this is my first time seeing crypto rating. I only know ICO rating siting sites which is untrustable. I wondering where they get data to rate crypto or maybe they get paid from the project it self?. We should be more wise and careful dont trust anyone.
in my opinion, don't trust the ico ranking site because they have been paid by the project owner to put their project in rank 1, it's better to always research the project yourself you want to invest in, so you don't lose your money because of the fraudulent project 
Not at all because you still need to confirm it if that ratings is real or not since we all know how the crypto sites can manipulate things especially the reviews about cryptocurrency so don't depend this one and invest base on your own analysis.
Maybe it could be rated base on their purpose of use. But it could also possible that it is rated through which they were in favor, I mean who knows if there such behind that result.
Exactly, reviews and ratings can only be use as your reference not as your guide on investing. If you see at least a suspicious ratings, then it can also be possible to happen on any coins/tokens. 
At this point most crypto rating sites have become a honeypot for attracting novice crypto traders. They are mostly manipulative and useless.
They describe the result instead of the causes for a certain event or trend. I think most of us can see through that bullshit.
But there are still some rating sites that push out pure data and do not try to manipulate public views about any of the results through opinions and whatever. Cryptodiffer is one such site, I have also seen them publish charts and figures in various official Telegram groups. Other than that I trust Weisscrypto, I think they are on the top of google search results as well. And they push out unbiased stuff as well.
They describe the result instead of the causes for a certain event or trend. I think most of us can see through that bullshit.
But there are still some rating sites that push out pure data and do not try to manipulate public views about any of the results through opinions and whatever. Cryptodiffer is one such site, I have also seen them publish charts and figures in various official Telegram groups. Other than that I trust Weisscrypto, I think they are on the top of google search results as well. And they push out unbiased stuff as well.
Maybe it could be rated base on their purpose of use. But it could also possible that it is rated through which they were in favor, I mean who knows if there such behind that result.
The problem is some people in the past have proven if the site like ico bench has been getting paid to manipulate the rating. That has become the main concern why so many people have been called it as scam. It could be rated based on how much they paid the ico ratings too.
Well this is my first time seeing crypto rating. I only know ICO rating siting sites which is untrustable. I wondering where they get data to rate crypto or maybe they get paid from the project it self?. We should be more wise and careful dont trust anyone.
Maybe it could be rated base on their purpose of use. But it could also possible that it is rated through which they were in favor, I mean who knows if there such behind that result.
The Chinese government always has its assessment, as you can see most of the top coin are filled by a coin who made by their citizen.
And I don't think that this table/ranking will affect the whole of crypto currency ecosystem, most crypto users will understand it.
And I don't think that this table/ranking will affect the whole of crypto currency ecosystem, most crypto users will understand it.
I believe in crypto ratings, but it depends on the agencies or websites that are the source of the rating. Because a trusted
source will give a valid rating and it really helped me in choosing coins for investment. And for me CCID and WeissRating
aren't sources that I trust, but in my opinion WeissRating's rating results are quite valid when compared to CCID. Many
factors are causing differences in the rating results of various websites. Do your own research and investigation, so we can
distinguish which is valid.
source will give a valid rating and it really helped me in choosing coins for investment. And for me CCID and WeissRating
aren't sources that I trust, but in my opinion WeissRating's rating results are quite valid when compared to CCID. Many
factors are causing differences in the rating results of various websites. Do your own research and investigation, so we can
distinguish which is valid.
check for the criteria how they assess the cryptocurrencies. dont jump into conclusions without identifying those factors that made them decide which one is better than the other. you will understand their evaluation if you will know how they dissected each crypto.
most crypto ratings have their own criteria but in the end, which one is really popular and have more followers?
The cryptorating site other than icodrop will always be manipulated but I think there are some that are still reliable like cryptorank. You can even see the old history of how successful icodrop listing a lot of successful ico which has been giving really nice return.
I believe in crypto ratings, but it depends on the agencies or websites that are the source of the rating. Because a trusted
source will give a valid rating and it really helped me in choosing coins for investment. And for me CCID and WeissRating
aren't sources that I trust, but in my opinion WeissRating's rating results are quite valid when compared to CCID. Many
factors are causing differences in the rating results of various websites. Do your own research and investigation, so we can
distinguish which is valid.
source will give a valid rating and it really helped me in choosing coins for investment. And for me CCID and WeissRating
aren't sources that I trust, but in my opinion WeissRating's rating results are quite valid when compared to CCID. Many
factors are causing differences in the rating results of various websites. Do your own research and investigation, so we can
distinguish which is valid.
I got a few cryptocurrency rating sites information, but I don't believe anyone. Astonished that almost every crypto rating site predicted that EOS blockchain would be the top coin. I don't support it because privacy coins are the best. Bitcoin and monero gold have the biggest privacy in cryptocurrency.
The ratings were done based on their own perception and do not mean it is the most correct. That is why there are no discrepancies between the. Had it been they are accurate, there would have been many similarities. So it is very obvious that they are only expressing their personal minds and not the correct general opinion.
It's a great scam, crypto rating was making sense previously until it became infiltrated, there was this ICO I bought back then in 2018, due to the fact that they got some nice team members and the crypto rating was almost 5.0 which is the highest, up till now the ICO has not be listed
If the rating is not actually about ICO projects then definitely yes for me, normal ratings have no pay day involved right? I don't know about CCID but since it's asian EOS will surely top the list.
There are easily the most unreliable source of research directories when finding out about projects. Most of these rating sites are paid to promote and build reputations of these projects making them presentable to the public more than they actually are. All these to entice unsuspecting investors and then dumping their tokens on them and running away. It has happened repeatedly in the past.
I don't know CCID capability or reputation to rate Cryptocurrency what are their criterias, obviously, Bitcoin should rule all the rating site, all existing markets and exchanges have Bitcoin as their number one and in my opinion, this is the real parameters of Crypto rating.
Jump to: