....
The point is,
God wrote His own Book by causing the writers who actually penned it to write what they did.
The second point is, since God wants freedom for us, while at the same time He wants to remain in control, God actually causes the things that we think we freely do and write, to often happen according to our wishes... and without us even realizing that He is behind it all... until we examine the way things work, scientifically.
So HE decided to 'inspire' 40+ writers over the course of 2500 years!!! Please, you do not really believe that!!!
Talk about lazy and unsure God.
The real reason this book was written was to provide some guidance on how to manage social interactions.
Around the time when the agricultural revolution started, first cities were formed as people did not have to wonder around for food.
Agricultural revolution allowed for the fast expansion of the population. This created problems.
It is very easy to manage a group of 40-50 hunters & gatherers. But it is nearly impossible to manage a group of 5000+ people.
So myths and 'God laws' had to be written down so that the ruling class could reference them and implement the laws by killing the violators.
This helped to reduce crime. That is the real reason why this book was written, by people for other people.
First you express that God doesn't exist. Then you suggest that I don't really believe that He did something He did. Then you suggest that He is lazy and unsure when you know that He created the universe to operate by cause and effect, which is way beyond anything we can even imagine doing. Then you seem to suggest that He wasn't behind the writing of the Bible at all.
The thing that is amazing is that you, somebody who doesn't seem sure about the existence of God or not, haven't gone out and expressed your own personal volumes of knowledge about the workings of nature and everything else. I mean, a funny farm resident might do just that.
And you can see by the humble videos of Graham Hancock and others, that archaeology shows us that there really were no hunter gatherers thousands of years ago that were any different than ours today in various parts of the world. In addition, there were great technologies in the prehistory, just like there are today, as shown by these same videos. Consider Gobekli Tepe.
Perhaps you should let us know which funny farm you are at, just so we can drop by and say hi sometime.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_TepeGöbekli Tepe is from 10th millennium BCE, way outside 'your creation date' of circa 4000 BCE.
You were there back then? You know somebody who was there back then? When you look into the papers and books from many of the scientists who date things, they express that their dating is just a guestimation, and that they really don't know.
Graham Hancock is a writer. So you like his novels; I'm not surprised. Not sure what this has anything to do with reality.
The Graham Hancock videos show that standard archaeology is way off in their idea that ancient peoples were simple hunter gatherers.
The standard hunter-gatherer stuff is made up, just to cover up the idea that people of prehistory were far greater than we think, and even than we ARE. It is also made up to downplay the knowledge that God exists.
There is enough accurate history in the Bible.There we go again. You have just hanged yourself again.
Neuroscientists know where your God exist.
Call any university that has a strong Neuroscience research program, they should be able to locate God in your brain without any problems.
Try to read from more than one book.
Perhaps when you get to the starting point, then you will be able to move ahead in your understanding.
The starting point is recognizing that God exists,
through the science proof, and through the fact of the existence of the universe.
Until then, you are always going to remain mixed up in your thinking.
You really have trouble understanding what science is and how it works.
Let me explain how science works.
If you were given a task of proving that God exists, you would have to do the following:
1. First, you would have to assume that God does not exist.
2. Collect
physical evidence, make measurements, collect the data on your God etc.
3. Analyse the data
4. Publish your findings
5. Your peers (experts in God-ology) would review your data, examine data in 2, REPEAT your experiment
6. If your proof/data passes the peer review, it is published in God-ology Journal
7. Now the fun part starts, every scientist in the world would try to re-validate your data to see
if they might be able to show inconsistencies (and make the name for themselves, maybe win a Nobel Prize)
This is how any scientific theory is validated in the lab.
Unfortunately for your God, you can only do step 1.
Hint: Literary works are not scientific data. When was last time someone used Shakespearean play to validate the String Theory, or determine a Cosmological constant?
After steps 1-7, you still would have go through the same steps to prove that the God you discovered in 1-7, is YOUR Christian God.
In order to find physical evidence about God, scientists will have to research beyond time and space, and come to the moment before universe was created, and when time and space, and material things, didn't exist.
Can they do it?
Of course not.
So, they can't research God really.