I never believed in public ratings. Any information of this kind can be easily falsified. Therefore, I prefer to make my own rating, based on what I read and heard.
I've seen a lot of projects with good ratings that actually turned out to be a scam. Many "experts" are ready to put maximum estimates to any project for money so we can only hope for our analysis. 
Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 73. (Read 6947 times)
yes i am a believer of ico rating. every time i am going to invest in an ico firstly i have to check the rating from ico bench and ico rating then i will move further to invest
Yep there are some sites which add ICO for good money so you needt trust them with 100% and i think everyone must research himself and find more info about any ICO he wants to invest even join as bounty hunter.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Many of good ICO's you can't find in this websites.It is like Private ICOs. Here you can find the best ICOs and chatting with quite experienced crypto fans here https://discord.gg/hP7KEy7 Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Now many different ratings and tables. But you can't always trust the ratings. But you have to take ratings into account when making a decision.
I do not believe much in ICO rate. People can buy votes from experts. I evaluated the ICO based on its analysis, the practical application of the project and in particular the amount of capital the project has called for.
I think these rating websites are of some reference value. But you can only use it as a guide. When you choose to invest in ICO, you have to do more in-depth research on your projects.
I really think ICO rating should not be considered as a reference for good or not an ICO project, we need to learn more about the project so do not just look at its rating alone.
I only believe ICO drops aside from ICO drops I don't believe other people's rating, I believe ICO drops because they are the ones that choose the project they list, they choose the project they will invest into.
I would believe in these ratings if there was at least a little accurate information. After all, these ratings are based on personal experience and perception. That says that this rating is 100% reliable only for the one who wrote it.
I do not believe in ICO ratings, as many ICOs with good ratings were unsuccessful. But when choosing ICO, I look through these ratings, they help me to drop completely unnecessary projects. But the decision I make by other criteria.
It can be an advisor. Tap You always do your own research before investing in ICO. You do not just trust a particular website that highlights some ICO. If you want to make money in this sector, it's always about your own research and our own information that you gather. Most people check ICO ratings as one of their references where they will choose to invest, but for you the ICO rating is just a guide and you do not really believe how they rate some icons.
I do not believe because they are normal websites and not objective. If project give the money, they can take a good ratings
I never believed in public ratings. Any information of this kind can be easily falsified. Therefore, I prefer to make my own rating, based on what I read and heard.
I think these rating websites are of some reference value. But you can only use it as a guide. When you choose to invest in ICO, you have to do more in-depth research on your projects.
I really do not believe in the ICO ratings offered by these sites. There seems to be manipualation and there is cooperation between teams and websites. Do not rely too much on those sites, it's better to check there own ICO web and whitepaper and ICO manager.
I don't really believe in ICO rating. They can't really be sure that a coin is going to be a scam or not and if an ICO is going to be successful or not. They sometimes make mistakes.
It can help to have a summary of an ICO.
It can help to have a summary of an ICO.
I have participated in ico which has a high rating but after ico finished it all did't match my expectations, so since the incident I never believe with the rating ico ,, in order to generate many benefits and avoid the scam the best way is to be fixed through self-research
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Ratings are just a race for the highest bidder. first, the platform opens, gaining trust. And then the money starts to get up every game. And don't hope that one of them is honest. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Yes, I believe that most of the time these ICO ratings have some reference value, but you can't always rely on these ICO ratings. Because some ICO projects are paid marketing, the score is higher.
Actually, it is always better to use all these ratings than do not pay any attention to them. As for me, I prefer to find all the needed information about these projects at this site: https://icorating.com/
ICO rating actually that site very helpful because they also have to do some research team ICO. The ICO has the best value or top I thought it was our mandatory thoroughly again. With the hope of scoring system that it is true and there are no attempts at fraud.
Jump to: