Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 70. (Read 6918 times)
if the rating is good then many believe and will have many investors so that it can be my reference to follow ICO because to analyze whether ICO is reliable or good is one of them by looking at the rating
I do not trust the ratings. Especially icobench. I use this resource only to find the information I need. It seems to me that the ratings of some projects are bought. There are bad projects have a very high rating.
ICO ratings don't just pop up from nowhere they are actually given to most or some ICOs after they have subjected the ICO to series of test and consideration and also questions have been asked in most cases the developer grant interviews just for the clarity purpose and records.
Often happens such, what even serious ICO with a good rating happens not the present.
From this we can conclude that you can not trust only the rating.
From this we can conclude that you can not trust only the rating.
In the investment world, you can only trust yourself and consult others
I think they're a great start to get a general overview of an ICO.
By no means should you invest based on ratings alone but I think they're a good basis.
By no means should you invest based on ratings alone but I think they're a good basis.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
At first I believe in ICO ratings but when some ICO is scam even if they listed in ICO bench,now I never depends on ratings but the background of the team to fascillitate their good project and to communicate well in telegram. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I believe ico ratings are overall great reference to start reading, there are many links to specific icos and also how much money or coins they already collected etc.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
When there are lots of ratings then yes, if there are only few then no.
I do not really believe in ico rating, but now that's all I can use as a reference, besides that, I always check the whitepaper
Ico rating can be a good way to know the project and it's idea but it depends on the ico rating site. Some are just a
Like a charade.
Like a charade.
Yes i do believe on the ratings for the ICO and also i do get good ICO in there and this is my part of my research why i got some good research and also i do believe that getting ICO on it is a good way to get ICO
Of course, I always pay attention to the rating of the project, but before investing I study the project myself.
I don't believe in them that much but at least they somehow give me some help me with my ICO research. After all, we still need these ICO reviews to get the opinions of the so called experts in the market. However, we should not just dwell on these review site's ratings. Their ratings do not assure in any way that the higher the projects get the more successful they will be. Apparently, that is not the case.
You can't rely in one review alone. I am going to ICO rating thrice in seven days not just ICO rating including different sites. In the event that I am intrigued or searching for another project to invest, if I see that it has a + rating in ICO rating I considered it as a + to the project. Then, I will try to compare to other websites and check other individuals' sentiment.
Checking ICO ratings provides a speedy guide to joining ICOs. But as I have observed this does not necessarily equates that the ICO will be succesful after. I think there are other factors in ICO that review sites does not consider. So I think it is important that you do more research and analysis about the project.
Those indexes can make them shine, so for me I do not believe in those ICOs. I think that our investment in ICOs should not be based on indicators but on the experience we have available to analyze them. This will be more secure for our investment. Not to be confused.
ICO rating sites have criteria they use in conducting their reviews, ranging from the team members, project quality, whitepaper and some other factors... I think some rating site such as icobench coukd be trusted. But it is also advised that individuals do indepth research in prospective ICO's you're willing to invest.
You should never believe what you see, but sometimes this rating helps me navigate, well, for example, in cases where I can not choose something specific.
I was very skeptical about all the ratings, until I began to study and disassemble them in detail. It will be enough to take and view projects for the last few months that were in the top of each rating, what forecasts each site gave. And compare with the actual data. You will see that there are sites that really understand how ICO works.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Great observation, my friend. I myself am not that trustful to these ICO review sites. It would be either that these sites are not that comprehensive in their reviews or perhaps they are even assigning a certain price to their ratings. I guess, the main point in their reviews is the complete information and details of the project. But they do not really dig deeper and ask for some clarifications and more explanations from the developers themselves as to the whole deal of the project.
Jump to: