Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 68. (Read 6918 times)
The presence ICO in the ratings is a good sign for me. At the same time, it is better if a lot of rating websites write and inform people about ICO project. But the rating itself (rating evaluation) practically does not matter for me.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Those ratings don't guaranty anything. It can be used just as a reference only and as one of the sources of information. It's always best to rely on your own research.
i don't believe ICO rating because some ICO have low rating but that ICOs is give profits and some ICOs are high rating but not give good profits hence better to understand project and read whitepaper about ICO then believe the ICO and invest
I do not 100% believe it, maybe just as an additional reference only, because the ratings they provide are not all independent
He can just give the Idea, but we need to read the Technical Paper and Check the ICO Twitter page and the Telegram Group, which the ICO administrator does. How serious are they about the project on time? They are updated daily. They take care of the members and react well.
ICO rating provided by such websites, I think, can only be used a references. Of course these sites have their processes and standards when giving such ratings. It doesn't mean that what they say is absolutely correct. they probably won't even reflect more than half of what the ICO is really worth.
I believe in ratings in which projects are discussed by living people and make a decision all together. An example of such a community: icodrops. In the telegram channel more than 11000 people, find and discuss new ICO, share their opinions and very rarely make mistakes! This is not advertising - it's true!
Initially, ICO ratings only role as one of the consideration to choose an ICO. However, it is not the most important thing to consider. We must know their concept and team that creates the ICO. We may not directly believe in the rating only. It may lead you to be lazy to analyze the ICO. Just do your research and know the ICO more than well.
I think that we need to be very cautious about the ratings of ICO. They are only recommendatory in nature, but you have to make the final choice of the project yourself.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I actually don't beleive on such things as ratings of the ICOs to detwrmine whether it will be a huge one or not. Ratings are just speculations and expectations and atill, everything will nit always go as planned. The platform that the project is promoting would more determine if it will be a good one or not. Based on what OP stated, ICO ratings are not accurate. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I don't trusted their website even it has a good way of entertaining some investors just like the ICO I use to read last year and participated. Because it is really disgusting they almost run their ICO and their spreadsheet didn't even update then almost 2 months of participating I ask their manager on the telegram they said paused it without a announcement on thread but in the emails of their website are still ongoing.
Imho Russian Icodrops are legit. Not sure about others. ICOs have a lot of money and they often offer for fake reviews and ratings.
I would not put any money on the table just because someone rated an ICO as a 5 out of 5 anyway. $DYOR
I would not put any money on the table just because someone rated an ICO as a 5 out of 5 anyway. $DYOR
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
ICObench.com on this site you can buy a top rating for money. In general it became interesting to me and I looked at the rating on the ICObench of all top ico's for the last month and a half
Mainframe 2.7
EdenChain 4
Egretia 3.1
Sentinel Protocol 2.9
Phantasma 2.5
QuarkChain 3
Atonomi 1.5
Draw conclusions yourself...
Only invest what you are willing to lose. Dont put your money all in one basket. Proper financial planning is important in every investment we make. Try looking in in SafeCrypt.io. A high security exchange that has high standards of quality and every piece of software is being tested multiple times before they make it publicly available.
I spent some time to study SafeCrypt ICO. I think this ICO could become one of the best this spring, because of several reason:
1. This is cryptoexchange. And this cryproexchange has some advantages compare to existing ones: instant transactions, lowest fees, absolute anonimity, large select of crypto assts and others.
2. They lead very good ICO policy.
3. THey have Adequate and reasnable bonus rates.
read more here https://safecrypt.io/r566
I spent some time to study SafeCrypt ICO. I think this ICO could become one of the best this spring, because of several reason:
1. This is cryptoexchange. And this cryproexchange has some advantages compare to existing ones: instant transactions, lowest fees, absolute anonimity, large select of crypto assts and others.
2. They lead very good ICO policy.
3. THey have Adequate and reasnable bonus rates.
read more here https://safecrypt.io/r566
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No I do my own research and so far I'm successful with it, I have nothing against these ico ratings but they are not a guaranty that the ICO is good especially if the ratings comes from visitors these icos can launch a voting campaign to manipulate the rating.
In my opinion, these reagents have a definite meaning, but you need to look at the verified sites and only then that estimate can correspond to the truth of this project.
ratings in different websites are good source of informations, you can surely visit legit links of the project and of course, articles that you may rely on. But self stidy and own research will bring more good result than refer in 1rating only.
These websites made a lot for ICOs, because they simplified the process of project researching for investors. Moreover, the collected and structured their information and data from the whitepaper and website. So, at least we have to say thanks for them. About the ratings, don't trust them, because it is not objective.
I think you can't trust anyone. Especially in the crypto world. You need to think with your head and make decisions yourself. Then then it will not be so sad and you can get experience from your own mistakes.
Yes i believe in ICO Ratings, but don't relay too much with it.
you must check by yourself about ICO you want to participate.
you must check by yourself about ICO you want to participate.
Jump to: