Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 69. (Read 6918 times)
Yes, most of the ICO encourage all their member and every campaign joiners to vote for their team because it will serve also as data for others who want to join and invest with them.
Seeing many ICOs do not match what they value. I see many Websites that rank for the ongoing ICO or for the future. and I have found that a sizable portion of the ICO rating requires payment to get your project listed on their website.
I will invest on my own research , because i am not sure if i can trust these sites. Maybe a combination of both is the best way to go , but it would be so easy to just buy a good rating.
This is a complete deception. I believed them only when ICO was a little bit. But in 2017 the ratings began to promote frankly fraudulent schemes
The entire crypto space is full of rapidly expanding companies and drowning in user requests. If you’re a company in the crypto space, the solution is outsourcing. But some of this rating is good Im sure. They analysis the company and give the rating for ICO players or investors. The majority of ICOs don’t even have a working product, just a conceptual white paper that outlines how the coin will work.
I have never and will never trust any kind of on line rating site for anything; especially cryptos!! Common sense dictates that the site is there to make an operating profit, so why wouldn’t they charge for high ratings?! And there is no clearity concerning the careers of the people who are doing the ratings; they could just be 10 my months into crypto for all I know.
At first, I made such a site a benchmark in searching for a good ICO but then I found ICO which is not listed on such website and ended with success. After that I no longer trust the site that gives ICO rating. Looks like the ICO pays to be on the list of sites, but I do not know.
I believe with ico rating but do not trust 100%, because there are also projects that got a bad rate but the project was quite successful. For me ico rating is just as a reference to choose a potential ico.
for me i really dont believe in ico ratings but its a big impact if we know if the ratings of the ico high rating, and some investors will invest on it but sometimes its the project it depends on how the team works for the success of the projects. even if thats a high rating or not .
I believe, because I am sure that a portal will of course give his best judgment. And will provide an assessment of honestly. In fact I made this as an ICO ratings criteria in selecting the ICO project.
I believe in the ICO rating because the ICO rating team has obtained an entry information from the upcoming ICO white paper, they are professional then normal investors.
yes of course because of that ranking we can see the potential altcoin done in sales transactions on the ico. after that we can also get the latest information in an ico that is always fast in providing info. and in the presence of this we can easily see the potential of an altcoin.
Yes I believe in ICO rating. I believe that the rating greatly affects the goodness price of the coin / token. If ICO get a high rating then the token issued will have a high enough price. Conversely, if the rating is low then the token issued a low price also and the ICO it can considered unsuccessful.
i have learned so many lessons from my mistakes, sp from now on i will never believe 100% all of the score ICO rating gave us. those informations are just references from the info they have from ICOs, are surely not all of them are correct or no guarantee that the ICO will not scam us in the future, so i will only use Ico rating for support in searchiong for new informations about iCOs, not to investing in ICO by ICO rating.
I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
Yes rating sometimes just a number but it do helps sometimes atleast we know what they think about project and after that we can do our own research to find wether its good or not. After all we the one who will lose the money when we invest in wrong ICO so just trust yourself and find as much as information as you can So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
I never invest in the ICOs. I make use of the reviews only for participating in the bounty campaigns. And normally I read reviews from multiple sites before taking a decision. From my experience, I would say that 80% to 90% of the reviews are accurate.
I think that such sites can not be trusted. They have Vip accounts and corrupt experts. I do not trust some advisers either.
I think it can be a good indication of a few things, but I would also not only invest due to ICO ratings. Remember that most of the ICO rating websites are pay to play, meaning that an ICO has to pay to be on there, I've heard to have an analysis is thousands of dollars as well. Therefore only the ICOs that are back by big investors or have a large marketing budget will truly get seen on there, and good interesting projects that are bootstrapping will not be.
I would use it to find ICOs that interest you and then look deeper into the project, look at their whitepaper, their team and ask questions on here. If you are satisfied with the responses, then proceed by investing or taking part in their bounty campaigns.
I would use it to find ICOs that interest you and then look deeper into the project, look at their whitepaper, their team and ask questions on here. If you are satisfied with the responses, then proceed by investing or taking part in their bounty campaigns.
My advice will be to check multiple websites and not trust just one blindly. This is because oen particular website might be doing paid promotion of an ICO which does not have much value.
Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.
Jump to: