Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 78. (Read 6947 times)
Oh, of course it not an objective assessment of projects. I am sure that you can buy a good evaluation. ICO ratings sites don't help a lot in such matters
Not at all, most of them are just providing fake information, it is more than obvious that they are getting paid for modificating the ratings that each ico has in there.
Ico ratings are more than important now and they are a good character in every ico
Ico ratings are more than important now and they are a good character in every ico
Not at all, the only ratings that I believe in are the ones that I have made after my research. A lot of the ICO listing sites get paid to list these ICOs on their sites. They are also paid to give good reviews to projects so that people will invest in them whether good or bad.
I don't believe any of ICO rating and prefer to analyze all informations about some ICO by myself.
But, of course, but sometimes I use them just for reference.
But, of course, but sometimes I use them just for reference.
I think that you can not believe these ratings. Most likely they deceive us, because they are corrupt. You should be able to find a good project yourself.
I didn't believe on the website on ICO ratings but think sometimes it will be useful. But it's better that you do your research when you want to invest.
I do not trust. in most cases they are not right how can i trust in this case?
I experienced pain last week from hashcard. That's why I will trust my intuition.
I do not think I will be able to get into it easily. ico the process is over for me.
I experienced pain last week from hashcard. That's why I will trust my intuition.
I do not think I will be able to get into it easily. ico the process is over for me.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I believe on ICO Rating because they clearly give a perceivable representation of how the ICO is faring in the industry. But it does not mean that I just believe every rating I see about a certain ICO. There are bogus sites out there in the internet that give inaccurate ratings of ICOs that often lead to people getting mislead and in tje end failing in this industry. That's why you have to take a keen eye on everything and not just believe everything you see but make a personal investigation and observation itself. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Most of people are checking ico ratings as one of their reference on where they will choose to invest, but for me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos. But is still depends with the investors how they will believe this ratings.
In some points youre right because we dont know how they categorize the ratings about all the ico in their listing,though most of the ico that becomes on top rating successfully finished the project.but its still the investors to decide whos to get in or notRight, success of a project depend on the interest of investors while ico rating is just a measure of how good the project is and how experienced the team is. ICO rating i think give you an opportunity to go through few ICO project for investment rather than search for yourself through hundreds of ICOs.
At some point, I believe in it until such time that I will read some information that it should not be trusted and considered since it is manipulating too, but as of the moment one of my basic info relies in the ICO ratings.
If you use the expert rating, it is not an objective opinion. If the rating is targeted program of specific data on investment risks, development team, escroy, and to the rest, it is the surest way.
I did not know about this project, but thanks to this article I decided to read about this project and realized that this is not a false project and it is very promising!
I don't believe it that much but i read them sometimes to see if there's information that i missed regarding the project. Each ico rating uses a different benchmark for their rating so i may find a point very important but they don't mark it at all. That's why i always rate the project myself because by doing that i know if the project is suitable for me or not.
Most of people are checking ico ratings as one of their reference on where they will choose to invest, but for me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos. But is still depends with the investors how they will believe this ratings.
In some points youre right because we dont know how they categorize the ratings about all the ico in their listing,though most of the ico that becomes on top rating successfully finished the project.but its still the investors to decide whos to get in or not 
And what do you think is the site with the most truthful ratings? I've heard that there are some where all the ICO's are worthy and where they do not add everything that pops up.
I've never seen a trusted ico most of the sites are being paid by the company just like QTUM you can see on the icobench that they are rated low but look what QTUM now. 
Of course you should not believe the ICO trackers, as there is also for sale listing . Of course it is very expensive, but the industry contains a lot of money. I am sure that any such site it is possible to negotiate the purchase of anything. The question will be only in price . Maybe there are some honest sites, but I'm sure a few of them.
I do not trust and repart. For example: the rating of the company was 4.7. A week before the end or a little more was a scum.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I do not often believe in the ranking of ICO experts on some ICO review sites.Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I think the analysis should be done by one's own. They must have good economic thinking and analysis of ICO projects will be easier and more efficient. I like economic issues, so I often analyze myself.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I dont believe it. Its something that can be manipulate and something that can be biased with. We dont really know who gives ratings on those kind of websites.
I think ICO rating is just where we look for basic information about ICO a coin. The rest we have to look for other information related to the ICO. Basically an ICO we can predict sales from technology or ideas on the stretcher and what issues cause ICO a coin is needed. From the problem whether the technology or idea is able to solve a problem or give the right solution. There is one thing that can lead to a sold-out coin even if the technology or the idea is biased, that is a good ad. The more people who talk about ICO from a coin the more people will be interested in investing. So everything becomes possible so that the ICO rating is not a benchmark.
Jump to: