Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 81. (Read 6918 times)
I really do not believe ratings. Rating websites take some money for higher rates. Do you own reseach
You have to register a profile. No KYC, of course, so you can pretend to be anybody. Then you have to “Apply for Expert” in order to be granted the privilege to assess ICOs.
I prefer to believe in the true attitude and identity of team members. For those who have the strength, it is a good choice to follow their footsteps.
ico rating provides good information for us as a businessman to determine which ico to choose so I think it will be fine and very helpful
Sure I believe, I use ICO rating as a reference. I can find many latest ICO information and update on ICO rating. I feel helped by the ICO rating
Personally I feel that there may be a conflict of interests because some of the listing websites charge fees, and this may alter the judgment of the project someway wouldn't it?
I trust the rating only that is presented on the site icodrops.com. The other sites do not provide accurate information about crypto projects. But it's best to analyze the crypto project yourself and put your estimates before investing.
The ICO rating sites seem to be pretty close in ratings. I would research on my own first, and then see if my findings line up with the rating sites. There of course have been some ICO's that were given 5.0 across the board and still turned out to be failures or scams. I would rather lose out because of my bad judgement, not a collaborative effort.
i personally not too believe. because maybe some ico rating will rate you if you pay them.
so, ico rating is not my standard to invest on ico. usually i see their detail on website or the whitepaper.
so, ico rating is not my standard to invest on ico. usually i see their detail on website or the whitepaper.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I am trying to watch ICO ratings from reliable inform sources in the net. And yes, many times I use such lists for making investments. I haven’t noticed that it was helpful. I mean effectivness didn't grew.
Wow! Satoshi gives out free bitcoins! https://[phishing]/index.php.topic=5.msg28.php
Depends on the metrics they use, whether it can be calculated objectively or it still contains opinionated assessment. There are a lot of ICO review company right now, and the best way to get the objective assessment of a project is to do our research by crosschecking it on multiple ICO reviews and asking directly to the team behind it on their telegram group. We have to be more careful because ICOs are not regulated and can easily perform exit scam without being detected and dragged to court by us.
I don't rely on some kind of analysis or ratings. I always do my own research before investing.
I suppose that most of such ratings want to get money for a positive review
I suppose that most of such ratings want to get money for a positive review
These ratings are just business. Even if there is an adequate and honest appraiser, then among the jackals and hyenas, thirsting for the dough, it's hard for him to survive. It is better to trust your intuition and knowledge.
Well I don't. there were a time that I believe that sites until I invest in a project with a good rating almost perfect actually but later it is go scam and I lost some money, well I think it is like if you pay us more we will give you higher score. So for me is don't trust ICO ratings site
ICO ratings are established to guide traders in order to choose the ideal token to buy, with its ratings we could choose where to invest best, however, thorough checking is a must since they are not regulated by any financial authority,fraudulent transactions may be hiding in those ICOS,. so to be safe do not just put it all up just by looking at the ratings, check it carefully so you wont be sorry in the end.
there is a possibility that the rating on such sites is not always truthful, so it's always worth choosing the project and analyzing its prospects
Well if you know the source and follow his previous work, it should be pretty reliable but u really need to be sure that person is authentic reviewer. But you still should do your own research before you decide to invest in any ICO since you own money will be on the line.
Yes, I believe in ico ratings as some of them are very helpful because they stand as a guide in choosing an ico of interest. With the ratings even if some of them are not always as it is and changes, they still help some people in making good selections and this probably shows how relevant some ico are.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Definetly sometimes i thinks that the decision is unfair on such ICO rating that provided by the website,because as what you stated there are circumstances that they rate a good rating,but its low reach in soft cap,while in the other hand there are some good project that they reach the hard cap but in the end they get a low rating,thats why sometimes i thinks thats there's a bias on the ICO rating. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Jump to: