I think it is not correct to compare the numbers. With the increasing development of science improved the weapons and methods of destruction. So the numbers are constantly growing. But the goals of the Inquisition and terrorists are different. They hate Muslims.
I understand. I don't know if you are right, maybe so. In other words, today's terrorist kill count cannot be compared to yesterday's Inquisition.
I do feel that there is no "moral equivalency." If the numbers can be compared, then today's Islam is 100-1000x more violent than yesterday's Christians. If the numbers cannot be compared, then it is impossible to say that yesterday's Christians are as brutal as today's Islam.
Either argument accepts as a premise the barbaric, brutal nature of Islam today. And that's Islam as a whole - it includes the good, peaceful muslims and the violent extremists.
Historical documents show that Inquisition killed around 6k people. Bolsevik atheists killed around 66 mio people ( direct and indirect), US Capital punishment (more than 20k not including few million of indians) about of 200k aborigines were killed in Australia. Millions of people have been killed by romans
Around 1mio civilians were killed due American invasion. What about Syria? Congo? Vietnam?
Remember of Vendee Massacre ( French Revolution) should I continue?
You don't need religion to kill. It's in your blood. Let's talking about animals, more than 500 mio animals are killed annually by cosmetics industry (just for women pleasure) what about sport hunting?
To compare Inquisition with other mass murder is BULLSHIT!
What about asian countries? they are not christians or muslims ( I'm not talking about Indonesia)
People have been killed each other over and over again. It's all about supremacy, resources, glory etc..
Remenber the 6th commandament : You should not kill!
I'm an orthodox christian ( I don't hate Muslims, Buddhists, atheists) My religion does not allow me to hate.