Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 6. (Read 5979 times)
Yes, a big bonus is a trick for attracting new investors, but speaking of big bonuses for new investors or even more than 50% I think that's fine. because the most important thing in proyak is that reality isn't just about big bonuses. on the other hand the main problem is that many projects offer large bonuses just to lure investors, it's important for anyone to be more thorough and don't be tempted by projects that offer large bonuses.
It is possible for early investors but they should put a limit on numbers of early investors. This is just a marketing strategy of the campaign team and it is fair enough for those who trusted their project first. Example: First 5 investors gets the 40% then the next batch should get 30% and so on.
That's how it works, they allocated certain amount for bonuses and they place it in different levels. Once the offer is being filled then they will provide another sets of offered tokens. Before it was successful but due to the fact that all investors are just aiming for quick profits, coins being dumped afterreaching exchange making the project suffered from heavy downfall and hard to recover and most of it died after some months of existence inside exchange.
no i guess developer might gives with condition on returns as managing terms of evaluation to put on drawing as release with offers for public audience. as uses with the funds to helps on beginning initiation of terms as developer to complete mockup on showing of pro audience as might the project to gains of more with popularity and collects of more funds on extensive option on terms with the listing of token with the exchange market with the business on crypto finance.
with the future terms we might work of our project DOGEM to put with lists on IEO market to gains of funding to cover expense as completing the deliverance of offers for public of audience from indonesia.
with the future terms we might work of our project DOGEM to put with lists on IEO market to gains of funding to cover expense as completing the deliverance of offers for public of audience from indonesia.
It is possible for early investors but they should put a limit on numbers of early investors. This is just a marketing strategy of the campaign team and it is fair enough for those who trusted their project first. Example: First 5 investors gets the 40% then the next batch should get 30% and so on.
I think the plunge in the price of project tokens lies in the control of the market and the influence of the project itself. If most investors have enough confidence in the project, they will buy more tokens. If the situation is not good, it will definitely sell a lot.
I think the 40% bonus for the initial investor is not a big bonus or arguably a normal bonus for investors who invest early in a project, indeed the initial investor will get a bigger bonus and if the invested project runs smoothly and successfully, I think bonus 40 % will be a huge bonus.
I have watched many projects with great rewards. They are almost all deceptive projects of investors. When they see a high return on their investment, some time later, the CEO of the project will disappear, along with the amount of investor money.
Yes, I think it's a pretty big bonus for early investors. But on the other hand, the project team needs support and therefore they are looking for it in their investors. But unfortunately most of them buy coins just to make a profit.
Supprt will always be given by investors but the problem is if those developers are not so competence to develop the platform. offering big bonus in early phase of crowdsale just a kind to destroy their project as people will do an instant dump to the market. So many projects have died caused by this kind of promotion.
Giving bonus must be suitable for promotion and its circulating
If giving too much bonus, it would be bad in the price
If giving too little, it would be bad to promotion
I think 40% is good enough and balance. Not too much and little
Then, the project itself will tell how good attracts investors
If giving too much bonus, it would be bad in the price
If giving too little, it would be bad to promotion
I think 40% is good enough and balance. Not too much and little
Then, the project itself will tell how good attracts investors
Cannot tell, but if they dont impose any bonuses they can attract few investors. Some of them invest due to this kind bonus and huge free tokens but good thing is ICO are always have a vesting period for this. Yes the bonus is high but the rewards can be sell or trade when its unlocked by certain period. Cause if a bonus like this without any locked tokens then good bye, dont expect investors wouldn't dump their free tokens.
It can be depending on how many tokens are reserved for early investors and if there's a lockup period for bonus tokens so they can't be spent immediately and crash the market value of the asset once it lists so make sure to check all of these details to ensure its worth your while investing
I don't think so, bonus is what attract big investors too, but it should not dump if the project is listed in an exchange with good liquidity.
Don't blame anyone except the developers and the team of the project as they are the one doing the planning and implementation and they should be aware that scenario like this would happen.
Everyone who own a token if they see they have a good chance of making profit, they do sell it without a doubt, even if it will cause a dump afterwards.
I doubt that there will be a dump. if the bonus is 40%, it will certainly provoke a dump. Well, I always avoid investing in projects like that. even when they register in a large market, there is no guarantee that they do not sell the bonus they get at that time. as far as I can see, even bonuses below 40% have the possibility of dumping when listing on popular exchanges. Don't blame anyone except the developers and the team of the project as they are the one doing the planning and implementation and they should be aware that scenario like this would happen.
Everyone who own a token if they see they have a good chance of making profit, they do sell it without a doubt, even if it will cause a dump afterwards.
Yes, I think it's a pretty big bonus for early investors. But on the other hand, the project team needs support and therefore they are looking for it in their investors. But unfortunately most of them buy coins just to make a profit.
That's right, most early birds are surely become a dumpers if the coin successfully being added to exchange. This 40% bonus will be an easy moneyto put inside your pocket without a sweat. Though the risk is also there and if you'll be unlucky instead of getting 40% bonus everything will be loss
accompanied by those scammed developers.
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
To me 40% bonus is more than too much for early investors, but I see it that the team uses it to attract investors to buy their token and with that you can imagine what will happen when the investors decides to sell of immediately when listed
Yes, I think it's a pretty big bonus for early investors. But on the other hand, the project team needs support and therefore they are looking for it in their investors. But unfortunately most of them buy coins just to make a profit.
I don't think so, bonus is what attract big investors too, but it should not dump if the project is listed in an exchange with good liquidity.
Don't blame anyone except the developers and the team of the project as they are the one doing the planning and implementation and they should be aware that scenario like this would happen.
Everyone who own a token if they see they have a good chance of making profit, they do sell it without a doubt, even if it will cause a dump afterwards.
Don't blame anyone except the developers and the team of the project as they are the one doing the planning and implementation and they should be aware that scenario like this would happen.
Everyone who own a token if they see they have a good chance of making profit, they do sell it without a doubt, even if it will cause a dump afterwards.
Yes in all honesty a 40% bonus to early investors is detrimental to the project itself. On listing these investors will sell their tokens thereby causing a major dump in price of the project tokens.
Yes, I think it's more than enough bonus and for these huge bonuses, the project will be dead within a few months because all the presale buyers will dump the price when they get a chance. Therefore, I did not see any good project gave a40% bonus nowadays. Recently I have seen a project that giving 60 bonuses, I feel sure that this project will deceive its investors or the project will be dead.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 250
—RUSHMOON — Automatic LP & Yield Farm & AMM on BSC
I dont think bonus have too much affect to token price. Its depend on the project, if they do good marketing, good tech, good price... then the bonus rate would not so important. If a large community interesting on the project, then the price will decided by the crowd and bonus rate will be very small. 
I disagree with your opinion Because, in my opinion the big or small bonus will certainly greatly affect the price movement in the market, when the token is listed, Because, in reality today many projects that offer large bonuses experience price dumps in the market, maybe for investors large bonuses is a profit so at least when the price of the token goes down, but they can still benefit from the bonus received, but for traders or investors who buy after the bonus period ends, of course they only get a loss when the price of the token dump, we can imagine if there are 100 big investors buy tokens in large quantities and of course plus a 40% token bonus and when tokens are listed on the market then they sell tokens simultaneously, will it not make a dump price?
I dont think bonus have too much affect to token price. Its depend on the project, if they do good marketing, good tech, good price... then the bonus rate would not so important. If a large community interesting on the project, then the price will decided by the crowd and bonus rate will be very small.
I disagree with your opinion Because, in my opinion the big or small bonus will certainly greatly affect the price movement in the market, when the token is listed, Because, in reality today many projects that offer large bonuses experience price dumps in the market, maybe for investors large bonuses is a profit so at least when the price of the token goes down, but they can still benefit from the bonus received, but for traders or investors who buy after the bonus period ends, of course they only get a loss when the price of the token dump, we can imagine if there are 100 big investors buy tokens in large quantities and of course plus a 40% token bonus and when tokens are listed on the market then they sell tokens simultaneously, will it not make a dump price? Jump to: