Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 3. (Read 6034 times)
Clearly 40% will bring in big investors, but they will come with high greed when the coins are listed on the exchange, with the total coins owned certainly not a problem if they sell everything with a margin percentage of less than 4%. Not very good for the current trend even though there is nothing wrong with it.
Shit projects will never offer 40% early investors. Obviously i think price will crashed after exchanges listing such over bonus. Bounty pool is another important fact in project big pool will crashed in market. Hunter try to sell very fast after exchange listing so they will capable to dump. Now majority of the bounty give token a few phase like as monthly basis or token locked for six months to one year. But a bright project can crashed for the low liquidity exchanges. Many factors are involved to dump price.
if I think personally, if a project offers a bonus of 40% is a good step because it can attract large investments in the market including being able to attract investors to invest in the project. This is a project trick and my advice is always be vigilant before making any decision.
I think that is a big bonus, most of the projects that I have met that give big bonuses like that experience dump when listing in the market. And most good projects do not provide such a large bonus, because even without a large bonus investors will remain interested in the project because of their good products. If they get 40% bonus, they will sell 20% below the ICO price because they still make a profit.
a profit of 40% in my opinion is enough for a coin after listing on the exchange, an investor does a lot of calculations to decide whether to immediately sell coins or will hold it. Investors get the 40% profit is not a problem, the important thing is not to make coins into dumps. because if that happens, it usually leads to another investor panic
No project has ever failed because they gave %40 bonus for the early investors. I am not saying "no project that gave %40 bonus to early investors has ever failed" if you noticed, I said "because they gave %40 bonus" . If you are a good project and doing something amazing and the coin you create is loved by the masses, you can be sure that no matter how much bonus you give will not result with anything bad. You can give %100 bonus to early investors and as long as your coin is loved and awesome, the project will continue to live. If you make a horrible project and hated by everyone, you can have zero bonus and it still wouldn't matter. The only thing that matters when creating a new coin is how great the idea is and how great the execution is and how much community likes it, those three things are the only things that matter.
Why do many tokens lose their value after listing. One reason is the bonus given to investors, a bonus of 40% is a huge bonus in my opinion. But this is only the reason why dumps occur, and I cannot blame this. Because the project team did this in order to attract investors to be interested in investing.
I don't think so ,the 40% bonus is normal regarding dump has many factors that clearly the team does't have the ability to manage the market ,experienced traders are the main key in price formation as well so it's not just a bonus undeveloped products are key tooWhy do many tokens lose their value after listing. One reason is the bonus given to investors, a bonus of 40% is a huge bonus in my opinion. But this is only the reason why dumps occur, and I cannot blame this. Because the project team did this in order to attract investors to be interested in investing.
I don't think so ,the 40% bonus is normal regarding dump has many factors that clearly the team does't have the ability to manage the market ,experienced traders are the main key in price formation as well so it's not just a bonus undeveloped products are key too 
In my opinion, the 40 percent bonus is too much, and if it provides a bonus of that size, a short time limit and certain requirements will apply. Upon first listing on the exchange, 40 percent bonus would hurt the market price. So it's not just prize hunters that can hurt the market, even investors are going to hurt the market if they just want to profit a little. Investors are generally able to sell in advance the coins they purchase.
You can think about vulnerability to the market when the project provides such a percentage of bonuses, the creators will also think of that problem but the damage does not seem to be too great for the development path of the project because the number of people who can directly participate without a doubt to get a high reward is very few. In addition, you only think about the first time the project is listed, the damage will come but don't forget that if the project is not listed, who will those blame? 
Why do many tokens lose their value after listing. One reason is the bonus given to investors, a bonus of 40% is a huge bonus in my opinion. But this is only the reason why dumps occur, and I cannot blame this. Because the project team did this in order to attract investors to be interested in investing.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
I think it can be counter-productive, and can certainly lead to people buying in only to sell later as soon as they can. But I don't think this is the reason for price drops.
We have to consider how price is ultimately determined - supply and demand.
By definition, if a coin fails to hit hard cap then there is more supply than there is demand, so immediately you have that downwards pressure on price.
There is an added effect from 'bonus' buyers wanting to sell and the same from some bounty hunters, but ultimately lack of demand is why the price tanks every time.
This could also be the cause why people isn't bhying that particular token after the ICO or IEO, because they tend to think that since the token was sold in a lesser price, it is quite unfair for them to buy it at standard price. Or else, they will buy ehen somone dumped the price of that token. So, what will happen is that, people or investors will really dump the token becayse they could see bounty hunter does it too just to avoid lossing profit.
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Definitely it's enough to make this happen. Understand how it works: you bought token for 2 USD on ICO and some guys (many people) bought it for 1 USD. Exchange starting price is 2 USD for example. You won't sell it, right? And they will! They already have some nice profit, why should they wait?
I can only laugh if someone says that dump was caused by bounty hunter 
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Yes because with bonus of this size can make investors free to throw away their tokens and with this bonus they also have quite a lot of profits if sell at the beginning of listing 
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Definitely it's enough to make this happen. Understand how it works: you bought token for 2 USD on ICO and some guys (many people) bought it for 1 USD. Exchange starting price is 2 USD for example. You won't sell it, right? And they will! They already have some nice profit, why should they wait?
That is a business that has a high risk because investors have a high risk when investing at the beginning, not necessarily the project can be listed on one of the exchanges and the project could have ended scam.
It must be remembered that the bonus offered if it is too high can have a big impact on any project, we cannot blame investors, bounty hunters or the founder of the project because crypto is truly unexpected.
It must be remembered that the bonus offered if it is too high can have a big impact on any project, we cannot blame investors, bounty hunters or the founder of the project because crypto is truly unexpected.
If the project has potential and has a big chance to make it big, if I am the owner, I will not offer a single bonus to investors. Let them find out what my project is all about and let them weep when they found out that my project make it big and 40%? Thats too much, I can't imagine my company 40% owned by the public, it like I owe them that much.
Not so long ago, I would say that a bonus of 40% at the early stages of investment is too much, but after analyzing the situation on the crypto market and the projects in which I took part(there were several where I invested on pre-pre-sale), I can say that this is a payment for risk. But maybe I was too bad at choosing projects to invest in))
40 percent is not too much if such a bonus is given when you are one of the first who invests in a project. these are very high risks and they should be adequately paid. Of course, the project team should ensure their risks too and freeze your tokens for a while, but I think that 40 percent is a normal bonusyes in my opinion it is an amount that is too large so that it can cause dump because the wall doesn't care about price, they only care about the benefits of investment
A 40% bonus is not large, because it's normal for early investors because a project must have a way to attract investors and this is one way to give a bonus. It's just that now it is very difficult to attract investors.
yes in my opinion it is an amount that is too large so that it can cause dump because the wall doesn't care about price, they only care about the benefits of investment
A 40% bonus is not large, because it's normal for early investors because a project must have a way to attract investors and this is one way to give a bonus. It's just that now it is very difficult to attract investors.Jump to: