Topic: Do you think advisors help new projects? - page 4. (Read 1804 times)
I think advisors stand the chance of filling the gab between success and failure of a project. Personally I think advisors do help new projects very well in different categories. Most of these advisors are pioneers in the crypto industry who knows much as to how, who and when to do anything pertaining to the project as they help in directing the project onto a successful platform.
If the advisor is actually known and has some successful credible project at his portfolio then i think its actually normal to trust them If the project team are doing their work those advisor will make it gain some ground
Good advisors could actually be of help if they are consulted. Sadly, in most cases the core team just try to thrive of the influences of advisors, instead of seeking to learn from them. People get interested when they see some big names as advisors, but that shouldn't be the primary reason of getting advisors.
Certainly, the presence of an advisor certainly makes investors optimistic about the future of project and collect moneyt, unfortunately many projects do not provide definite information about the adviser so it is not convincing for investors.
Good advisors could actually be of help if they are consulted. Sadly, in most cases the core team just try to thrive of the influences of advisors, instead of seeking to learn from them. People get interested when they see some big names as advisors, but that shouldn't be the primary reason of getting advisors.
Even in real life you don't see that many public listed projects really put their advisors to good use. But there you have it. Having a good advisor that actually consults than a big name guy with no real technical expertise is 10x better for your project... but gains you nothing in terms of interest from investments. That's the sad reality.
Advisors are paid for reviewing and promoting new cryptocurrencies, do you think that they get paid for negative reviews? Of course that not! Advisors are not independent, so do not trust every word what they say.
Amidst this, the role of an advisor cannot be rejected in the development of a project. In cases where the authenticity of the advisor is low, the team can choose one member who is more experienced in cryptocurrency marketing and other affairs to provide various strategies especially during certain market situations. 
different unit on identification as investors to release one with option as buying new commodity on market with the index, to gains with difference as targeting limit of returns on profit to complete within the terms of plan with the bitcoin trading business.
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
The advisor will help a lot in guiding us to take decision. They are capable ini giving many opinions about the project. If the project get good recommendation from some big named of advisors, there will be many people interested into the project. So, we can deny the influence of the advisor. They are also one of the reason that why the project become success.
Advisors really do have impact on projects , the only issue is if the projects really do listen and make Use of the advise they give to them ! The advisors have the capacity to guide the projects which is why they were appointed ! Majorly they do have impact on the projects
Good advisors could actually be of help if they are consulted. Sadly, in most cases the core team just try to thrive of the influences of advisors, instead of seeking to learn from them. People get interested when they see some big names as advisors, but that shouldn't be the primary reason of getting advisors.
Advisors are paid for reviewing and promoting new cryptocurrencies, do you think that they get paid for negative reviews? Of course that not! Advisors are not independent, so do not trust every word what they say.
Amidst this, the role of an advisor cannot be rejected in the development of a project. In cases where the authenticity of the advisor is low, the team can choose one member who is more experienced in cryptocurrency marketing and other affairs to provide various strategies especially during certain market situations. Advisors are paid for reviewing and promoting new cryptocurrencies, do you think that they get paid for negative reviews? Of course that not! Advisors are not independent, so do not trust every word what they say.
Amidst this, the role of an advisor cannot be rejected in the development of a project. In cases where the authenticity of the advisor is low, the team can choose one member who is more experienced in cryptocurrency marketing and other affairs to provide various strategies especially during certain market situations. 
Paid advisors can't give the honest review if they look at the project review as an additional income from nowhere. The long experience is not a small thing but it is not enough to measure the success of the ICO with the only experience. There are teams with the anonymous LinkedIn social media pages but they get the C- rating by the advisors.
The future of crypto relies on the project owners and whatever it happens to their project, advisers are still safe.
What is promoted more than average promotions was not attracted me, the quality product speaks for itself instead of seeing the banner ads on the social media page corners. Advisor's opinion can help me to cover the minus sides of the project, opinion without any critical evidence will not change my mind to invest in the project or go for another one. Paid youtube reviews are also vulnerable while investors look for review of the famous people.
l would really like to point out it is a very helpful topic. On the hand there are no advisers, who can help and on another hand who create ICO project, they sometimes don't want to get the achievement. They are only thinking about making a lot of money. l would like to mention that, l have no doubt that is true. Personally, they are extremely greedy and l despise it. It discourages me like other investors.
It absolutely they just making money. Advisers are not helping anymore and project owners never rely on them for any help that they could give.The future of crypto relies on the project owners and whatever it happens to their project, advisers are still safe.
of course yes advisors do really help new projects in diverse ways since these advisors have been in the crypto industry for long and knows how many things function and how to do things systematically. Advisors are indeed the core eye and have a 70% influence in determining the success of a new project.
Of course, advisors play important role in the development and success of a project. What matters most is the expertise level of the advisor in cryptocurrency, its market analysis, when to release the finished product and to which population to target with such product. The team must also be ready to make good judgments if advisors provide the wrong move.
l would really like to point out it is a very helpful topic. On the hand there are no advisers, who can help and on another hand who create ICO project, they sometimes don't want to get the achievement. They are only thinking about making a lot of money. l would like to mention that, l have no doubt that is true. Personally, they are extremely greedy and l despise it. It discourages me like other investors.
It absolutely they just making money. Advisers are not helping anymore and project owners never rely on them for any help that they could give.The future of crypto relies on the project owners and whatever it happens to their project, advisers are still safe.
An experienced, reliable and competent Advisor will bring bright future in the project development. But in some cases placing Advisors "only as an supplement" (Possibly indeed paid) but not participating in developing the project, only formalities on the website, whitepaper etc. I don't think it will have a positive impact on a project.
each ico project has each advisory team that fits their field or expertise. But I think the important role in a project is the developer and the project team, the advisor only helps to attract the ico investors and developers who are the most important in the ico project.
Yes it's still the developers who needs to work a lots advisers are just part of the team they can do influence if they are well known from the target venue of service that the team is aiming, known personalities have a good impact in the minds of wise investors, if there's a value of that particular personalities they can gained potential investors but all this will be at the hands of the developing teams.
I think it all depents on qualification of advisor, if he is really good, of course he (advisor) can help project`s team.
I think advisor did not help new project. Because all we know that investors did not invest because of advisor's help, people will invest because of features of the project and the knowledge that they have to commit and investment in every project and it is not because of advisor. I think you must have to focused on marketing, it is more worth it if talk about new project.
I don't think that advisors can significantly affect on work of ICO project Team. At the moment, collection of investments through ICO is a risky business. Much more likely project to receive investment on exchange through IEO.
Jump to: