Topic: Do you think advisors help new projects? - page 6. (Read 1804 times)
Airdrops help projects at early phase to catch eyeballs of crypto enthusiasts and potential investors; help to build up widely communities. However, it long run, it might have side effects, because airdrop receivers might dump their coins. That is why we see some good projects do buy back and burn in order to keep price stable.
If you have an advisor like Roger Ver, then you can be sure that it would really help your project to raise at least soft-cap. Yes, really, only one name and that is enough!
So be careful and do not care only about good advisors.
So be careful and do not care only about good advisors.
This depends on how the CEO's policy, if the CEO receives assistance from existing advisors, can provide good advice on the project and can provide good development for the ongoing project.
that's the point of having an advisor on a project. provide advice and strategies that can benefit their project. Of course advisors are those who are experienced, of course their advice will be to build a better project. but that really depends on how their CEO accepts advice from the advisor. 
This depends on how the CEO's policy, if the CEO receives assistance from existing advisors, can provide good advice on the project and can provide good development for the ongoing project.
The fact that there are many projects out there that succeeded without advisors does not significantly means all projects will succeed without them. Most advisors are real experienced crypto enthusiast who know what is important for a project at every point in time and to me thats makes adviosrs very important personalities to help new projects.
for a new project it is indeed very important the role of the advisor to direct the best steps to be taken by the development team. if they move as they please and don't answer the answer to the problem they will ask their advisor.
The fact that there are many projects out there that succeeded without advisors does not significantly means all projects will succeed without them. Most advisors are real experienced crypto enthusiast who know what is important for a project at every point in time and to me thats makes adviosrs very important personalities to help new projects.
I do not see the impact of advisors on new projects. Nontheless, how many projects actually utilize their advisors. I just see them as mere pictures on whitepaper pages or website pages. If the advisors or projects actually get good words from the advisors, I believe we should see more of good and sustainable projects in the space.
especially for advisors with a background in expertise in cryptocurrency. they must have an important role to bring investors to join the new project they support. indeed one of the considerations for joining a new project, sometimes we see the team and the people who work in the project. advisors have a big role to play in new projects.
Advisors needed in the initial stage, and when it goes to raise money for the MMM , I think the advisors play the role of prestige . I know companies that have worked without advisors and perfectly entered their tokens on the market and everyone is happy. And I also kompanii , which was so cool advisers traveled to the United States , appeared on television , and in the end even paid hunters awards and tokens of them slipped a thousand times
Really good known advisors dont want to ruine their reputation. So, i think, good advisor is sort of good signs of the projects
I don't think it will help a lot, the advisor might be helpful for us to look for information, but in the end we need to depends on ourselves to find more detail information about the project, and sometime the advisor could be mislead if it's not neutral, so the advice could be a reference but the decision still in our hand
but advisor who already have big names and many followers can influence their followers to join the new project. it's very reasonable, and we can see several projects also take advantage of such opportunities. 
Yeah, advisers can help but honestly I don't think they play a vital role on project development. An adviser can give ideas, opinions and suggestions, but every decisions in the end are always taken by the person in charge such as main developers and their team. They play a soft role in this case, as ideas can be good to create better projects but not mandatory.
But on average, I can estimate the help of consultants at 10-15%. In any case, the core team plays the biggest role in the development of any project.
I do understand the fact that various projects succeed in this market without a single advisor but truth be told, the success of many project has always been the advisors behind the project acting like the brain behind the project giving it directions to follow. Advisors truly help new projects and without them, many new projects will collapse in this surprise market.
Advisers are needed to encourage projects to be more advanced, there will always be errors and lots of input from community members, such as the price of coins and the products they create, so we never think about how a new project can be successful if it doesn't have good advisory members. think the advisor is always needed for a new project
I have seen really dumb projects have super advisors, and really good projects have really dumb advisors. Like this guy Simon Cocking he advises so many projects and they are all bad. And he is editor in chief and his english is sometimes some of the worse I have seen,,, and I am not even the best English speaker around. And John McAfee too. So many shilling so many shitcoins.
We see every day a new ICO project launch, but it is very hard to take the decision, the project may be a scam, or even this new projects not a scam no guarantee the project will succeed, the question here do you think the advisors can help new projects to success, do you think the advisors give the new projects trust?
Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
Advisors help usually to make people believe that the project is good. Usually some famous people in crypto industry as advisors will make project get boosted when in sale. But at the end, i think they all almost same. Note that there are many successful projects without any advisors.
The purpose of this post to help others to take a decision when invest, so do not forget to vote.
Well, if we are referring if the advisors give an impact to a certain project then I will say yes. The credibility, the reputation and the professional profile of a certain advisor can be a good basis of a good project. The reason why it is because they are the people behind who will guide the project team in the development of the certain project.
But here's the catch. The advisor should be a real person or a legit profile. We have to know if is real or not because even if it is the most appealing profile but it is not true, it is useless.
But here's the catch. The advisor should be a real person or a legit profile. We have to know if is real or not because even if it is the most appealing profile but it is not true, it is useless.
I do not know about most advisors but I can only speak about the onne j am familiar with, I do not think advisors help projects at all especially social influencer advisors, for example Ian Balina who is famous for shilling Sparkster and a bunch of other dubios project, the ironic thing is that those he dumped ended up doing well.
I don't think advisors are needed too much for an ICO program to run. because whether or not an ICO program is running or not depends on the team that is working to continue to develop and lead to the targets specified by the ICO. if the team really works well and makes good use of all investor funds surely the ICO will arrive at the desired target.
and for investors who want to fund an ICO program, it is better to see and observe first whether the ICO program is really working on their project so that there will no longer be embezzlement of the project funds made by the ICO team.
and for investors who want to fund an ICO program, it is better to see and observe first whether the ICO program is really working on their project so that there will no longer be embezzlement of the project funds made by the ICO team.
I think advisor could help for success for a ICO. But it doesn't mean they would give you guaranty about the team. Advisors getting paid for their job, but they couldn't prevent scam if team want to skip with dund. Because advisors isn't involved with fund management. Even OP could advise on a ICO, but you could not give guaranty about scam.
I don't think they carry weight, it's the project that really counts we have seen hundreds of projects, that has a lot of advisors but unfortunately they still cannot keep up and those projects cannot keep up and they failed to gain supports from investors even though some of their advisors are big names.
Jump to: