Topic: Do you think "iamnotback" really has the" Bitcoin killer"? - page 3. (Read 79918 times)
I think there is no bitcoin killer in the market the people scams about bitcoin they do more of the wrong knowledge and wrong information regarding bitcoin and other crypto currencies. It is not good to be with them bitcoin is good currency and we are supporting this fully we will invest in this all the time and the bitcoin is the active currency of the market.
There are updates if you’re resourceful enough to look.
AnonyMint isn’t allowed to have an official user account on this forum site BCT to give you the information directly. He is permabanned (archived) for telling the truth too often about flaws in projects and correctly predicting LTC from $6 to $300 and other such transgressions.
Wow... there are lot of OG's in this thread
AnonyMint isn’t allowed to have an official user account on this forum site BCT to give you the information directly. He is permabanned (archived) for telling the truth too often about flaws in projects and correctly predicting LTC from $6 to $300 and other such transgressions.
He was banned for breaking the forum rules. but go ahead and continue making him out to be a victim despite the fact he's a grown man responsible for his own actions.
Yeah we see the “I’m the defender of absolute truth” button pinned to your lapel, did you become oblivious to your own short-sightedness. How exactly do you think you’re helping the situation? What Christian productivity are you helping enable or are you stirring up trouble?
The quoted link to Meta above contains his responses to that allegation, including your condescending/presumptuous attitude from back then on clear display.
I moved the rest of this post to Meta where it belongs, which elaborates on why there will be no official updates in this subforum (and to avoid BCT as a community building medium due to the highly dysfunctional trolling and unproductive “get rich quick” focus).
i think it should be around $7000 - $8000 strong demand will hold the crash
Based on what? Last time it went all the way down to around break even ($200) for miners despite people like you saying.. oh.. it will never go under 500. Oh.. There's strong demand and it won't go under $400.. blah blah blah. No one knows shit and it can make it's all the way back down again which, after the halving is probably now around $400-$600. Why? Cause as long as it is slowly going down (which is what happened last time), people lose interest and leave the market. The vast majority are looking to get rich over night and don't have what it takes to wait it out over some years.OMG you’re sooo expert and deservedly arrogant/smug? Umm, what if there’s more confidence now that Bitcoin is really a thing people all over the world see as real, unlike in 2013 when it was some toy that could just go poof at any time.
The HODL demand is more intense by now. See the flattening of the regression fit chart.
The majority (which are the greater fools) create the overshoots to the upside and downside, but the core HODL demand increases as adoption broadens. Duh.
There are updates if you’re resourceful enough to look.
AnonyMint isn’t allowed to have an official user account on this forum site BCT to give you the information directly. He is permabanned for telling the truth too often about flaws in projects and correctly predicting LTC from $6 to $300 and other such transgressions.
He was banned for breaking the forum rules. but go ahead and continue making him out to be a victim despite the fact he's a grown man responsible for his own actions.Wow... there are lot of OG's in this thread
AnonyMint isn’t allowed to have an official user account on this forum site BCT to give you the information directly. He is permabanned for telling the truth too often about flaws in projects and correctly predicting LTC from $6 to $300 and other such transgressions.
There are updates if you’re resourceful enough to look.
AnonyMint isn’t allowed to have an official user account on this forum site BCT to give you the information directly. He is permabanned (archived) for telling the truth too often about flaws in projects and correctly predicting LTC from $6 to $300 and other such transgressions.
Wow... there are lot of OG's in this thread
AnonyMint isn’t allowed to have an official user account on this forum site BCT to give you the information directly. He is permabanned (archived) for telling the truth too often about flaws in projects and correctly predicting LTC from $6 to $300 and other such transgressions.
Wow... there are lot of OG's in this thread
Thanks Veidt. I've also received a PM from user Traxo that the project is active (thanks Traxo). And that the initiator has again changed his account here. 
I was curious if this project - the "Bitcoin killer", be it called BitNet or whatever - is still active. Unfortunately the last posts are almost all off topic. I hope this project gets to flourish eventually, because some of its characteristics (above all to use it as a "monetary complement" of a non-monetary social/open-source/inverse-commons network) sparked my interest.
So, @AnonyMint, could you give a short status update? I hope you're fine.
So, @AnonyMint, could you give a short status update? I hope you're fine.
Quoted from his conversation with me:
Quote
We are trying to move forward. We were slowed down while analyzing the impact of securities law and devising how we can onboard millions of users without creating a security.
We’re also slowed down by my attempt to recover from gut Tuberculosis and my variable liver health condition (bad liver impacts energy and causes toxic brain dementia/delirium). I took on some loans and am trying to hire another lead developer (hopefully top-notch from outside the crypto sector) who is younger and healthier than me so I can impart knowledge.
We’re also slowed down by my attempt to recover from gut Tuberculosis and my variable liver health condition (bad liver impacts energy and causes toxic brain dementia/delirium). I took on some loans and am trying to hire another lead developer (hopefully top-notch from outside the crypto sector) who is younger and healthier than me so I can impart knowledge.
I was curious if this project - the "Bitcoin killer", be it called BitNet or whatever - is still active. Unfortunately the last posts are almost all off topic. I hope this project gets to flourish eventually, because some of its characteristics (above all to use it as a "monetary complement" of a non-monetary social/open-source/inverse-commons network) sparked my interest.
So, @AnonyMint, could you give a short status update? I hope you're fine.
So, @AnonyMint, could you give a short status update? I hope you're fine.
This forum needs a psychology section lol 
This forum needs
This btc value raise doesn't mean anything, the outcome is still as uncertain as it was when it was below 1000$. It might be a mini pump to make people believe ( especially some btc holders ) things are okay now.
Also this confirms what i told @iamnotback ( about a potential pump & dump war between BU and core after split, etc eth style ), roger ver said he would dump coins on core chain. Obviously after that he will try to pump it in a flippening attempt, something similar to what chandler and shilbert tried with ETC.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60n50d/roger_ver_confirms_in_case_of_a_split_i_will_sell/
Also this confirms what i told @iamnotback ( about a potential pump & dump war between BU and core after split, etc eth style ), roger ver said he would dump coins on core chain. Obviously after that he will try to pump it in a flippening attempt, something similar to what chandler and shilbert tried with ETC.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60n50d/roger_ver_confirms_in_case_of_a_split_i_will_sell/
They never pay attention:
WARNING! You better read my post in this thread.
they used bitcoin for marketing and probably they sold every bch they have. probably it will disappear in few months. same thing will happen to bitcoin gold.
WARNING! You better read my post in this thread.
Proof-of-work coins such as Bitcoin, Monero, and Zcash will lose all their security in the coming crisis, because miners won't be able to exchange BTC for fiat to pay their electricity.
Considering how stupid that statement is, I highly doubt the answer is yes.
Did he actually say that?
What a stupid cunt.
Proof-of-work coins such as Bitcoin, Monero, and Zcash will lose all their security in the coming crisis, because miners won't be able to exchange BTC for fiat to pay their electricity.
Are you serious? No electricity because miners won't have access to cash!!
I was referring to Jim Rickards' prediction that the elite will shut down the financial system for a period of time. I am saying that if that period of time is of sufficient duration that BTC can't be exchanged for fiat to pay for electricity, then mining farms have to shut down.
If the world is in such a chaos that the entire world financial system can be shut down and no one can move any fiat for some period of time, then proof-of-work miners can also be affected because they have bills to pay.
Whereas, a proof-of-stake system would not be so affected because it doesn't require consumption of an external resource. We might argue that such chaos would also shut down the entire Internet, but I tend to think the Internet is much more global, resilient and diverse than a few mining farms in China.
So please enlighten us as to which of us is stupid?
If the world is in such a chaos that the entire world financial system can be shut down and no one can move any fiat for some period of time, then proof-of-work miners can also be affected because they have bills to pay.
Whereas, a proof-of-stake system would not be so affected because it doesn't require consumption of an external resource. We might argue that such chaos would also shut down the entire Internet, but I tend to think the Internet is much more global, resilient and diverse than a few mining farms in China.
So please enlighten us as to which of us is stupid?
I didn't take the time to read all 16 pages, but regarding the financial elite turning off financial transfers in a doomsday scenario, thus forcing miners to turn off their machines, why wouldn't the electric provider accept Bitcoin or litecoin as payment for their service?
I'd rather not focus on that upthread diversion. It wasn't a particularly strong point. That is not the main problem with Bitcoin.
The intended point was simply that if we didn't have to rely on PoW (and its numerous disadvantages), it would be better (assuming all of PoW's positive attributes were retained).
Well, well, after all this time, @iamnotback’s highly ridiculed claim actually has some merit:
Re: Why hasn't any government stopped Bitcoin?
There is another very important factoid that I only recently realized.
The AML regulations which are spreading all over the world due to the terrorism theme the Zionists have foisted on the world (as explained in great detail in the videos I linked for all you to watch and keep plodding y’all to watch), make it illegal for miners to sell virtual currencies except on an AML regulated exchange (which of course the Zionists will control with their control over the regulators). You may not legally sell mined BTC to a private party or P2P. You can spend it on goods & services, but a mining operation can’t survive by spending its BTC, as it needs cash flow to pay electricity and upgrade mining hardware.
Thus you can clearly see that the Zionists are employing the nation-state laws to give themselves an eventual monopoly on who can mine Bitcoin. This is in addition to the ASICBOOST thing which I already explained upthread leverages the patent law of nation-states to give the Zionists a 30% electrical efficiency advantage.
They planned this out exquisitely.
There is another very important factoid that I only recently realized.
The AML regulations which are spreading all over the world due to the terrorism theme the Zionists have foisted on the world (as explained in great detail in the videos I linked for all you to watch and keep plodding y’all to watch), make it illegal for miners to sell virtual currencies except on an AML regulated exchange (which of course the Zionists will control with their control over the regulators). You may not legally sell mined BTC to a private party or P2P. You can spend it on goods & services, but a mining operation can’t survive by spending its BTC, as it needs cash flow to pay electricity and upgrade mining hardware.
Thus you can clearly see that the Zionists are employing the nation-state laws to give themselves an eventual monopoly on who can mine Bitcoin. This is in addition to the ASICBOOST thing which I already explained upthread leverages the patent law of nation-states to give the Zionists a 30% electrical efficiency advantage.
They planned this out exquisitely.
The high IQ1 genius Nicholas Taleb will publish his blogs to the blogging platform with the most readers, the best tools, and also the one that is the most antifragile (and a blockchain controlled by whales doesn't qualify as antifragile).
Sadly I think I recently read that he invested in Medium.
He seems far more interested in his buddy Dan's scam coin Steem than the Bitcoin killer he said long ago that would be released in early 2017.
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Well, it's not like making a new account is impossible. :p
You're right and those too will also get banned like all his others.
He has a large list of banned accounts.
And as a reminder.. I do not.
I have one account and have never logged into another one even once.. Ever.
And to the other guy.
Feel free to do your homework.
There is plenty of topics on Dan and all his coins.
Google is your friend
And congrats on leap frogging over the reason I even brought up Steem guys. Lol
He seems far more interested in his buddy Dan's scam coin Steem than the Bitcoin killer he said long ago that would be released in early 2017.
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Well, it's not like making a new account is impossible. :p
He seems far more interested in his buddy Dan's scam coin Steem than the Bitcoin killer he said long ago that would be released in early 2017.
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Steem is a scam? Why? From what Ive seen it seems to be a great idea.
What about it is a scam.
And like I said, hes doing what we talked about; not posting and coding I would imagine.
And believe me hes still around, just not posting much
Eagerly awaiting the mythical whitepaper solving all our problems. Of course I remain skeptic, if something sounds too good to be true it usually is.
It's not really good boy, do not be too eager for it. You can regret it. That's a reminder.
He seems far more interested in his buddy Dan's scam coin Steem than the Bitcoin killer he said long ago that would be released in early 2017.
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
Besides since he's banned its not like he's coming here to post it
He been quiet here, but thats due to the ban.
BUT, hes quiet on Steem as well
AND, his health should finally be coming back to normal, and now finally hes looking like hes busy coding.
I think that even if he doenst have the bitcoin killer, it will still be a coin that would be in the top 5, and thats a big deal for everyone involved
BUT, hes quiet on Steem as well
AND, his health should finally be coming back to normal, and now finally hes looking like hes busy coding.
I think that even if he doenst have the bitcoin killer, it will still be a coin that would be in the top 5, and thats a big deal for everyone involved
If anything is a bitcoin killer its Radix but I can't see bitcoin dying it will survive as an asset based investment.
Shelby is a good human but(!) critical thinker.
This is not there in core (AFAIK) - we have a strong leader there and cooperative effects (very odd but strong binding force seen in nature like cellulose or DNA or other polymers - Shelby had other words from German history for this dictatorship) - so it is not easy to break this and oppose or you will be Hearniated.
To me I do not fear 8 or 10MB or more at all - the constraints are 'in-silico' , 'in-relay' and in economics combined and embedded.
Satoshi did not want flood control, but memory prices were way higher 2010 - so he agreed and kept the limit increase un-discussed as a no-brainer.
Decentralization collapse that Shelby sees - I also don't fear as well - there is a clear repulsion force from the Nash Equilibrium - there cannot be a winning (mining) team for long (Risk of Reputation plays in here, despite you argued against, but this is higher level I think ) - I'm sure Bitmain knows that as well - these guys are not stupid otherwise they will be washed out - fine for Nash as well.
This is not there in core (AFAIK) - we have a strong leader there and cooperative effects (very odd but strong binding force seen in nature like cellulose or DNA or other polymers - Shelby had other words from German history for this dictatorship) - so it is not easy to break this and oppose or you will be Hearniated.
To me I do not fear 8 or 10MB or more at all - the constraints are 'in-silico' , 'in-relay' and in economics combined and embedded.
Satoshi did not want flood control, but memory prices were way higher 2010 - so he agreed and kept the limit increase un-discussed as a no-brainer.
Decentralization collapse that Shelby sees - I also don't fear as well - there is a clear repulsion force from the Nash Equilibrium - there cannot be a winning (mining) team for long (Risk of Reputation plays in here, despite you argued against, but this is higher level I think ) - I'm sure Bitmain knows that as well - these guys are not stupid otherwise they will be washed out - fine for Nash as well.
Jump to: