Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 62. (Read 9148 times)
Not so much really coz these are paid ratings. But there are still some truths in their reviews. Though not accurate, we can still make these ratings as reference in choosing projects to invest in. I don't think we can even find a fully reliable reference when it comes to choosing which project to join. It is still up to us to make that vital decision.
I don't pay attention to rating sites, it's long since everyone understands that stars and ratings are bought. I'm surprised why they still exist.
I monitor the ICO rating site, but don't just believe it. I monitor it as a reference and consideration material. I researched it later, and if my intuition is again good, I sometimes follow intuition but after researching.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Not really. I live by the saying that everyone has a price and if people are willing to pay then these websites would definitely be willing to forge good reviews for scam coins just so that they get a lot of investors. The only person you should be trusting is yourself and the research that you have made into whatever coin that you want to invest in.
There are several ICO Rating sites I follow. You do not have to trust all the sites. They may score high against the money.
We need not stick to a single site. Help is also needed from different sites.
We need not stick to a single site. Help is also needed from different sites.
I dont totally trust ico trading sites but it is a good yardstick on making your decisions after you must have researched thoroughly. I use just one ico rating site which is icodrops and I use it to make my final analysis in projects
I took part in about 10 bounty campaigns with high ratings. After the end of ICO, the tokens always cost much less than their nominal value. Investors have always been at a loss. Therefore, ratings can not protect you from losses in any way.
ICO ratings do not show a real situation. I do not trust the ratings, it's better to analyze the project myself and decide on the participation
ICO rating sites are not trust able but only give you a rough idea about what is project about its staring and ending dates its price etc.
ICO rating sites do one very good thing - they systematize information on the project in a very convenient way and express their opinion. Of course you should not completely trust the ratings. Have to think with your head!
Well in any original there must be a fake, come to ICO site rating some are trust Worthy why most are fake. But there some which are are trust Worthy whose result are great.
Not all the time because the some ICO rating site are sometimes is not trustworthy because some of them are not true about their rating. So I think its better to make a research by your own so you have a proof about there details. Also it will help you to pick the best ICO if you know how to choose or you can analyze the ICO before you trust to it, but if not then teach your self first on how to choose ICO. 
No, I do not trust ico rating but only use them as guide to find legit projects when I want to invest. Some icos are not worth the rating they get because later some of them crash while the less rater ones do better in the market. I check the rating and also take my time to do a very deep research before I invest in the project.
Well in any original there must be a fake, come to ICO site rating some are trust Worthy why most are fake. But there some which are are trust Worthy whose result are great.
You can not trust 100%, But such sites also can help you, make a choice or pay attention to any project, so I can pay attention to some project with a good rating, but of course I will personally check the project.
I do not trust any of these sites that rank the crypto projects. I do not know how they evaluate crypto projects, and many critical projects, with high ratings, in the end, turned out to be scammers.
I don't really trust ICO rating sites because I saw some project that have high score in ICO rating sites but they still are scam.so you shouldn't completely believe in ICO rating sites
Lately I’ve stopped trusting these sites because companies and web sites have been paying to get a good rating and that is very disturbing for us the society to get in-depth information about the ICOs
trust but check as they say, not all ratings can be trusted, I personally use the site icorating.com here you can find a lot of useful information about the ico ,100% gariantiyu it does not,but the risks are minimal.
No I personally do not trust paid ICO rating sites. these will surely be giving fake and biased reviews. Many scam projects got a lot of good ratings and then disappeared. So just do your own check before investing.
from some sections of the ICO, which are the reason that they need to be trusted, this is certainly a clear reason, because in every ICO rating development process it is necessary to strengthen the evaluation of their competitors. because some types of patents that are used as ratings in projects are, of course, the main reasons why they should be trusted.
Jump to: