Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 63. (Read 9148 times)
I think that rating can be a good assistant for the initial selection of companies, but in any case you need to independently study each project before investing.
I absolutely do and agree with what some people are saying. 
I don't trust them because they have their own opinion about the project and that may be different with mine, i only use them to see what ico that's hot right now, or the list of upcoming ico as they usually have information about them. I think sometimes you can lay money to get gold grade or something like that. Ico rating just gives us some vital information which may help in to decide the ico selection
Yes, I trust ICO rating sites. but still double-checking and independently explore the projects.
How can you trust ICO rating sites? This summer demonstrated that all rating to descend and practically all experts on them are bribed. They do not give real marks to projects which that deserve. On ratings they earn a lot of money, saying that the project and its command honest and perspective.Yes, I trust ICO rating sites. but still double-checking and independently explore the projects.
How can you trust ICO rating sites? This summer demonstrated that all rating to descend and practically all experts on them are bribed. They do not give real marks to projects which that deserve. On ratings they earn a lot of money, saying that the project and its command honest and perspective.
You should not believe them because that is just information for reference, To me it is so. Take a look at the sale of the token, and the number of participants in the project, you can evaluate the quality of an ICO project.
Such sites can only be used for viewing statistics on projects, such as social networking activity and the like. The rest of the analysis should be done independently.
the site rating ico just look at the completeness of the concept and other components. rating given is not yet able to give assurance of the ico will successfully get the maximum funding them. but ico rating can give us if the ico project feasible for us to learn more.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I don't believe in ico rating at all, I think it can be manipulated. for now I believe more in the ico I learned, with the research I did. if only "people say" I don't really believe. because they can lie.
No, I'm using the ICO rating website only to compare it and doing a private analysis with the project before going to invest.
Even a good rated project doesn't always end good and the bad rated project doesn't always end with the money raised below soft cap.
Even a good rated project doesn't always end good and the bad rated project doesn't always end with the money raised below soft cap.
no, i do not trust ico rating sites. too many have written very convincingly that these ratings can also be bought. since i read that, i don't trust such sites anymore.
ICO rating sites are now paid for good ratings. The best way to trust an ICO is to perform a personal research on the project, ascertaining a good confident level about the authenticity of the project. Read about the credentials of the team and the idea behind the project.
I've seen enough skam with good ratings and shooting projects. which did not appear on most sites. now these platforms are completely useless, in no way helping the average user, more even misleading
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Personally, I do not believe these sites, because there information comes from people who can do their job to write comments and evaluate the template. So this is not the best option for ICO evaluationWith all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
That 's right, it does not guarantee to make the ICO successful and achieve its goals so that they can design themselves. People who want to participate should be careful about this.
I dont really trust such ico rating sites.
I use them to collect information, but that's all.
Rating is therefore not so important to me.
I use them to collect information, but that's all.
Rating is therefore not so important to me.
NO! They can easily manipulated and lot of ICO rating sites are accepting payment for some ICO which it is really bad because they can still scam their investor, most of ICO now are scam, most of them are making ICO just to scam their investor.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Personally, I do not believe these sites, because there information comes from people who can do their job to write comments and evaluate the template. So this is not the best option for ICO evaluation With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Actually I didn't trust any ICO rating site because many ratings are paid by the ICO the more you paid the higher rating you will have so stop looking in the rating look in their project if it was legit or not just make research on the project to know if it was legit and reliable to happen.With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Not all the times It makes happened, some ICO are really matter to Its ratings on how goods It project development. And I agree with you about checking the background of a project to make sure, not just based on a rating, If you really doubt to invest or join Its campaign.
Sometimes it is very necessary to trust their work a bit since if not anything at all it helps to detect some scam project on the market but trust me there are loop holes everywhere that must keep us on our toes and try to become more vigilant of late.
When you enter in the website you will be rating ICO looking peek who get good grades. And you should have to do a restart because checking is very important. Not all projects located on the ICO website is great. But if you've done the analysis you can determine.
I'm not actually bases on the ratings of sites in ICO I'm the one who. Make a way to determine which is a legit one because we don't know about on that. It is more important to experience already to adjust your thoughts in ICO. Be, smart to choose in order not to regrets at the end. Jump to: