Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 67. (Read 9148 times)
The ICO rating sites are not completely reliable, there are several school of thoughts that most of the ICO rating sites are some times to paid to rank a coin higher than the rest, it would be nice if the ranking are done by individual researchers and voters
Actually when I looking for new ICO I always find out more on ICO rating sites like that
I don't say they are clean but they help me lot for looking good ICO to join
I don't say they are clean but they help me lot for looking good ICO to join
The rate of project is one of the most important criteria for me if I want to participate in. but its not the common one as the figures can be controversial.
Yes I believe, But I was Looking for simplified execution of predictive Insurances which are linked to real world events such as storms or floods. There should be a platform or protocol who can provide us this, So i have found SciDex Protocol who can provide us Insurances & Also Exchange Of Data.
Statistics show that there is no need to believe the rating agencies and firms that make ratings for crypto-currency projects, very often all this has no real benefit.
Yes I believe, But I was Looking for simplified execution of predictive Insurances which are linked to real world events such as storms or floods. There should be a platform or protocol who can provide us this, So i have found SciDex Protocol who can provide us Insurances & Also Exchange Of Data.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
actualy every people or bitcoiners have different views,on how to define or determine a good ICO,otherwise determining a good ICO rating site's is also important,so thats we confirmed the legitimacy of thats said project development,so that we could not go through or post through into the hoax project or fraud.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
We have seen so many rating sites lately, and unfortunately it is not possible to trust every source. In today's ICO sector, there are various kinds of fraud methods, but unfortunately it is necessary to remember that it is possible to see all kinds of fake scoring systems. I think it is important not to forget that I do not pay much attention to other services except for 1-2 services that have been the pioneer of the industry and that scams and high scoring can be taken as well as any bribery problems. For that reason, we should pay attention not only to these services but also to get results with our own researches. I would like to remind you that there are not many successful ICO projects in today's market. In addition to all these failed projects, it is worth remembering that many services receive high scores and that these scores are not logical assessments.
I don't have full trust on ICO rating sites, I don't think it is the sole basis for someone to trust ICO. I think there are still more to check than just those sites, you have to check their whitepaper, the team behind it and their road map. I believe those are more reliable source of information if you are searching and investigating on potential good ICOs.
I do not believe in ICO rating websites. I am only interested in WP's project and project dev team.
I don't trust them. I only use them to see what ico that's hot right now, or the list of upcoming ico as they usually have information about them.
I think sometimes you can lay money to get gold grade or something like that.
I think sometimes you can lay money to get gold grade or something like that.
Initially, the ICO rating sites help us to analyze an ICO. However, it will not guarantee that the ICO is legit and no scam. the exact thing is that we must continue to analyze and research the ICo very well in order to get the exact consideration and analysis. Here, we can see that we should not take the ICO rating as the only way to decide choosing an ICO.
No, because most of the ratings are bought. Who brought more money to the "experts", he will have a higher rating. Because that's how they can attract more investors for deception.
Most of them are manipulated or paid adverts on rating sites.
Yes, the main problem is that ICO rating sites are manipulated and bribed, without strict regulation the situation won't change
i wouldn't say a Yes or a No but Choosing ICO is not an easy task because lot of factors are needed to be considered in place and not just visiting any rating site to review/rate an ICO. It's also not too objective to follow and even far from the word appropriate expectations. better do a self-assessment based on the analysis and research of the on site assessment relied on the rating.
Most of them are manipulated or paid adverts on rating sites. You just need to check their telegram group and talk some with their team and you see quickly as you become more experienced.
We at crypto investment fund, SolidumCapital, have prepared a nice knowledge base for investing in ICO's. See it on our YouTube channel and subscribe to our channel for more quality content.
Content is free and will stay in the future!
ICO educational series
We at crypto investment fund, SolidumCapital, have prepared a nice knowledge base for investing in ICO's. See it on our YouTube channel and subscribe to our channel for more quality content.
Content is free and will stay in the future!
ICO educational series
I don't believe that ICO ratings is reliable. FroFrom what I have experienced not all of the ratings shown by the different websites is true. Most of it is manipulated or some of it might have paid the website so I think we need to stop trusting this ratings.
Ten ETH for 5 quality ratings，after i saw this，my little trust in ICO rating website turn into zero.
Most ICO rating sites collect funds from sponsored project to rate them high and the reviews done on these project are most time done from the project team which gives the investors wrong information of what the project is really made of. ICO rating sites need review from critiques to make them more legit.
I especially don't trust the websites with ICO ratings. The only website to which I more or less trust is ICObench.
No, I do not trust. Because ICO 80% are fake and scam. Investing in trust and killing yourself on your own foot is the same thing. 😒
Jump to: