Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 69. (Read 9148 times)
ICO ratings sites are only for reference, you should not rely too much on numbers, you should look at the idea of the ICO, how the project is going and the development team Who, all must be clear
It is also good that you trust ICO ratings when you see it in a bounty campaign and it depends on their ratings if it has a higher rate it means that ICO is good and can be trusted. Nowadays there is a lot of ICO that are launching and inviting people participants to join and to invest in the ICO always check the background of the ICO and the team that compose of that ICO. Always be aware of that when it comes to bounty campaigns.
believe, because the rating is also calculated based on the number of demands and also investors who participate in the investment of the project to achieve success.
It depends on you. If you really want to invest in ICO and only believing ICO rating sites or people who give ICO rating that will be a big mistake. Cause most of them take payment to give a good review. I am not saying that they are doing it in bad way. It's all about business and everybody is doing it. So when you invest in ICOs always do your research. And then invest. ICO sites are good for collecting information and data. So always do research and if you think it's good then invest. Never depends on others.
No I do not trust ICO rating sites. Most of them get paid for their reviews. So surely those reviews are going to be biased. So stay away from ICO rating sites.
yes totally, I trust each and every single one of them. They have 1 purpose only which is providing excellent rating score for big investors.
Why dont you trust them is the question?
Why dont you trust them is the question?
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Rating is one factor to judge its good coin or not. Many factor we can consider when we decide to join on ICO beside rating. Good rating does not mean it will reach success in ICO. We can trust several rating website because that website are independent
Are not. I consider it the basis and factor for evaluating ICO. Buying ICO requires and requires thorough attention in many respects. Having those evaluations, will speed up the decision process
There are several good sites on the Internet that issue ICO crypto rating, but there are many bad sites of the ISO rating that can manipulate reviews for personal gain.
No, I do not trust ICO rating sites entirely, this is just a guideline only. I do my own research before investing in ICOs.
Yes, because lots the ratings comes from trusted people and have lots of experience in that field
That is stunning if that is valid! Be that as it may, in the event that it was a genuine companion and not a liar, I saw many individuals with no certainties blaming a few evaluations for not being straightforward. In any case I don't confide in anybody, your companion, evaluations and ect. It can be profoundly appraised and still fall flat or be trick venture.
No. This can not be trusted. Only sometimes the rating may coincide, but this is rare. Often many projects turn out to be a scum, which is not very good.
I believe that sometimes ratings are useful for investors. Investors used it as a guide, whether they will invest or not. But then you need to independently check and study the crypto project, in which you plan to invest.
independent check is a must because you know what, most of the ico ratings are just paid to review and generally giving 5 stars depends on how much you want to pay. lets be honest here, there's so many sites kinda like this and the people are always popping out in telegram asking for devs to advertise their ICO and that's not a good thing if the review is subjective because it's paid.
I believe that sometimes ratings are useful for investors. Investors used it as a guide, whether they will invest or not. But then you need to independently check and study the crypto project, in which you plan to invest.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
very good info now I know that ico review websites earn a huge amount of profit. I still look on ICO review to base my investment perhaps we still need a forecast on this type of investment , I just need to do more research before I put my investment on the ico that they suggest. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
In my opinion, it is not worthwhile to trust the rating sites completely, but I believe that it is also necessary to take into account the opinions of experts who conducted the evaluation of the crypto project. But as a result, invest, only based on your decision.
It's always better to do your own research rather than trusting someone. But ICO rate sites can be usefull for gathering information about the project.
The ICO Rating site is only a benchmark or option to reconsider your decision. You do not need to immediately believe in what is displayed on the site, it can only be an essay or a fake. Because in this all-modern world, it's easy to make fake promotions or news.
So, everyone must beware..
So, everyone must beware..
I don't really trust ico rating site. Although, you have to put the review of them into consideration while choosing project to invest on. You probably see different rating of your project of interest from different site. Most importantly, look at the team and their white paper to see how strong are the team behind the project and the content of the white paper.
Jump to: