Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 75. (Read 9148 times)
I think you should trust your own ICO research, not the site.Since the rating will not make a company successful ICO.
Unfortunately, to date, I do not believe in the reitges, I have been watching several times for companies with a high rating and they were bad, and at the same time, the company with a small reateng has entered the stock exchange and made X
I support your opinion, I also noticed in most cases that the rating given by the site does not really have anything to do with the service itself, such is the situation, it seems to me that all this is done only because of the price paid for the rating.
ICO rating sites are a big no no, of course from a marketing perspective it makes logical sense to engage with one. But as an investor if your going to put the wisdom and decision making of what ICO to invest in, in the hands of a totally paid influenced 'authority' without doing your own due diligence you deserve to lose the clothes off your back.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Yes they are biased. As of now everything and everyone related to this field is all about making money so they dont care a bout the project or the technology behind it. Some of them are good but numbers are very less in that case! If you really wish to invest in a good project then you should consider reading their whitepaper do a research on their developing team! With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
There's many projects I believe in, for my comment I just increased holdings in Monero, Syscoin and Factom so far. But I'm researching others.
However it's best to do your own research on what you think is going to be a good project long-term.
If you have no idea I just recommend putting a small amount in Bitcoin and Ethereum and researching as you go. Just don't put more money than you can afford to lose, cryptos are really risky.
However it's best to do your own research on what you think is going to be a good project long-term.
If you have no idea I just recommend putting a small amount in Bitcoin and Ethereum and researching as you go. Just don't put more money than you can afford to lose, cryptos are really risky.
I nver trust ICO rating Sites its because most of reviewer are asking for money for a good review. Check some of the project they got failed rating even they are good project. Most of them dont want to pay a reviewer why they got low ratings. Better make your own review if you ranther than trustong ICO sites review.
#Support Vanig
#Support Vanig
Ya i do trust some of the ico rating sites like icobench and icorating...i dont trust them blindly but i keeps me a certain idea atleast to look for a project and then may be i start to read the white paper of a good rated ico from them and then i decide by myself
I don't trust ICO rating in any way, good ICO rating project can be achieved if you spend pretty amount of money, meanwhile many projects are over rated and they die along the way. However, there are still good rating website which we can believed in.
There are Internet platforms run by "Internet entrepreneurs" and Internet marketers who just want to cash in on the ICO boom. Do not strongly trust the ratings, but it is worthwhile to conduct your analysis.
ICO Rating is a stupid website. I strongly recommend that you do not believe in their information and reviews for that ICO. Just spend a large amount of money, you will get good reviews, this is so stupid. They should realize that they are supporting the scammers appropriating the property of others.
Unfortunately, to date, I do not believe in the reitges, I have been watching several times for companies with a high rating and they were bad, and at the same time, the company with a small reateng has entered the stock exchange and made X
Yes i do trust ICO ratings that will relatively help me identify on what ICO projects that is worth it for investing. As we all know that those ratings are from the ico clients or the investors itself that speak up from their experience on the project.
Sometimes ratings can be interesting and useful for investors. But you need to remember - they give only the initial presentation, basic information. Then you need to carefully study the selected projects.
I have seen many ico with good ratings but failed. ico rating is not a benchmark that ico is good or not. many have to be considered by looking at and researching the project team, escrow, whitepaper and other matters related to the project.
I don't really trust ICO rating sites, I only use ICO rating sites to make it easier for me to check every ICO that has good potential, I think the ICO rating site is very helpful for investors and bounty hunters in looking for good ICOs, I don't see any site problems ICO rating.
The ico rating website is still helpful for ico, and only when I choose ico, I will pay attention to the rating.
With the recent happenings, I wish to really express my disapproval in ICO rating sites. Reason being that, these sites have succeeded in rating so many ICOs that couldn't perform to expectation at the end of the day. Therefore, if I really want to make an investment into any project, I don't just stop at ICO rating sites anymore, I further my research on so many factors.
I do not believe because they seem like prioritizing more traffic on their website, there is no ico rating platform that is truly critical of certain projects so many fail to provide ICO assessments that lead to sales failures.
more ranking platforms have sprung up because of the complexity of the data that is easily made by many people, there must be at least one more complex to be used as a reference for many potential investors, if indeed the project is considered not good, then do not dramatize it otherwise. neutrality must be prioritized.
With the recent happenings, I wish to really express my disapproval in ICO rating sites. Reason being that, these sites have succeeded in rating so many ICOs that couldn't perform to expectation at the end of the day. Therefore, if I really want to make an investment into any project, I don't just stop at ICO rating sites anymore, I further my research on so many factors.
Sites that exhibit ICO ratings do not always do it objectively not impartially. If you want to invest in such projects, then it's too risky to choose ICO only because of the high rating.
Not entirely but it's one of the indicator for you to use it when you research an ico. See many ico rating sites for comparation if the ico use more then one ico rating sites. Do your own research is very important.
Jump to: