Topic: Do you trust ICO Rating sites? - page 83. (Read 9124 times)
I do not trust these sites at all. if you have a good progeny, if you are using social media successfully, and if you give money to these sites, your scores are high. Absolutely read the whitepaper, do your research before investing
I think the ICO rating is not a good factor to identify good ones. Many have to be considered if you want to invest in ICO, the most important are the project team and WP. check authenticity 2 things. Sometimes it is good to consider rankings and consider it a guide when you want to invest in a project but not just rely on this ranking because some good projects get less ratings and vice versa
Fixed rating developed by ICO, if the rating is low, do many people join? compare with a pretty good rating, you will be more confident.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
That's shocking if that's true! But if it was a real friend and not a liar, I noticed a lot of people without any facts accusing some ratings of not being honest. Anyways I don't trust anyone, your friend, ratings and ect. It can be highly rated and still fail or be scam project, it's up to investors to decide if the project going to survive With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
99% of all ICO LISTING destinations assert you can discover just the best ICOs on their rundowns, just the most encouraging activities, and the "distinct advantages". At the point when in all actuality what you find there are just activities that have paid them. So regardless of whether somebody made the most secure, quick, and private blockchain convention, they will never be on these posting sites, in the event that they don't pay.
ICObench does not claim to locate the best ICOs, as most posting locales and administrations do. Rather, they give an open source, evident scoring framework with the goal that speculators can without much of a stretch see the qualities and shortcomings of each ICO that we profile.
ICObench does not claim to locate the best ICOs, as most posting locales and administrations do. Rather, they give an open source, evident scoring framework with the goal that speculators can without much of a stretch see the qualities and shortcomings of each ICO that we profile.
Wise opinion, even though ICO rating is made for good purpose but unfortunately many are misused to manipulate data, this is our consideration to always look for comparative information and not just focus on ICO rating.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Well I don't fully trust ICO ratings. It has been a while since many noticed that some of those ICO who are listed on top of the ratings can either be a scam or even fail to achieve hard cap.
99% of all ICO LISTING destinations assert you can discover just the best ICOs on their rundowns, just the most encouraging activities, and the "distinct advantages". At the point when in all actuality what you find there are just activities that have paid them. So regardless of whether somebody made the most secure, quick, and private blockchain convention, they will never be on these posting sites, in the event that they don't pay.
ICObench does not claim to locate the best ICOs, as most posting locales and administrations do. Rather, they give an open source, evident scoring framework with the goal that speculators can without much of a stretch see the qualities and shortcomings of each ICO that we profile.
ICObench does not claim to locate the best ICOs, as most posting locales and administrations do. Rather, they give an open source, evident scoring framework with the goal that speculators can without much of a stretch see the qualities and shortcomings of each ICO that we profile.
This is more reason i do not trust most ICO listing sites' ratings. Newly lunched ICO listing site will be sincerely with their listing at first, but after some time, every of their listing will based on payment.
Sometimes
there are many good ICO Rating sites but there are also bad ICO Rating sites. they can manipulate the reviews. when money is involve there are people got blinded by greed and forsake moral values.
maybe I will also trust the ICO rating site. because it is one of the important points to choose the ICO project. but we also don't just focus on ICO ratings because a good ICO rating is not necessarily a good project because it could be a tactic used by scamer
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
I followed ico not based on rating, because for me the rating does not guarantee that the ico will succeed. to choose ico I believe more in myself, that is I do my own research.
not too much, I see, ico with a 4.8 rating, in the end, it didn't work/scam. and that has happened a lot. so, don't trust the ico rating site too much.
no, many projects write fake reviews and pay for high scores on these sites
You need to choose projects with a large number of reviews. On any rating site, there are some analysts who sell their reviews, but not all.
I trust some websites that rate Crypto projects, they are really cool guys, with the opinion of which I agree, for example icodrops, analytics.hypernum, monoico.
They cannot be fully trusted . A lot of scams and with high ratings. Therefore, it does not guarantee to find a good promising project . Study the project yourself - do not believe them
Considering the rating of an ICO as a factor to invest will probably be my last loint to consider. Most of these ratings are simply bias. They can be influenced by the project team to rate them higher.
I don't trust ICO Rating sites very much, but sometimes I pay attention to these ratings, especially those that are published on the largest and most reliable sites. If the rating is low, it means, that the project is not very good, and it is better not to participate in it
I don't believe that I am skeptical about this way of judging trustworthiness by personal work ethic. But to be honest, sometimes i refer to the ico rating from icodrop website.
They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.
With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
There are many ICO rating websites. Where did you read them? Hundreds of ICOs will be released every day, so there must be a lot of fraudsters here. Therefore, the ICO rating website is not completely reliable. In order to get a good rating, some projects will pay some fees to certain rating websites. You know, this is actually cheating. However, the ICO rating can be used as a reference indicator for screening ICO projects. More information is still collected by yourself. With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?
Jump to: