The above is a perfect example of misinformation that is not even supported by anything.
- relatively few people of any stripe are dying, or being labeled as dying any more.
Scarry numbers of people die every day. You can check by date and region using the sources below.
Sources:
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/ (Johns Hopkins University)
https://covid19.who.int/ (WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard)
These are sources who were themselves major player in running the scamdemic psy-op itself. Not credible.
For the most part they probably are producing numbers of actual people who actually died, and most of the dead may have had SARS-cov-2 viral sequences in them. Trouble is, most of the deceased had 'comorbitities' which were themselves fatal with or without a SARS-cov-2 infection, and most people have had a SARS-cov-2 infection, or breathed some of the broken nucleotide in and hence will come up hot on a PCR test if the cycle threshold is cranked up enough.
Interesting to note that if you have not been 'vaccinated' you are a 'covid case' if PCR shows a trace of nucleotide at 40+ cycles. If you have been 'vaccinated' then you are only considered a case if you come up hot at like 25 cycles. This is obvious deception meant to give numbers which pretend to show that the jab is 'working'.
If there is any sign of gaming 'covid deaths', and there are plenty, then I must assume that it is a common occurrence. The total death rate world-wide is so low that it could easily be the case that ALL of the deaths are gamed in the above manner, and at any point in the plandemic.
Vaccinated people don't get sick nor die. Virtually all new Covid deaths and hospitalizations are among unvaccinated people.
Sources:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/07/21/1018872469/worried-about-breakthrough-covid-cases-heres-what-to-know
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/vaccinated-people-singapore-make-up-three-quarters-recent-covid-19-cases-2021-07-23/
https://scdhec.gov/news-releases/dhec-analysis-more-90-percent-covid-19-cases-deaths-june-were-among-unvaccinated
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/07/01/995-of-people-killed-by-covid-in-last-6-months-were-unvaccinated-data-suggests/?sh=476c3653493d
The above sources all have means, motive, and opportunity to participate in the scamdemic and have demonstrated a great deal of enthusiasm for doing so. Not credible.
Content producers who provide links to their work tend to be much more reliable in providing useful and credible information:
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/only-unvaccinated-dying-fabrication-sage-advisor-says-cloth-masks-dont-protect-you-from-covid/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/psaki-spreads-medical-misinfo-cdc-adds-then-removes-6000-vaers-death-reports-fauci-caught-lying/
If they don't die or ruin their internal organs by the sickness.
SAR-cov-2 is a lab created thing so it is what it is. Cannot do a lot about it. It's less likely to cause harm than the gene therapy jabs created by the same people mainly because an indiscriminate spreading is harder for insiders to avoid. It's easy for insiders to avoid the jab for them and their families.
As for permanant damage, the 'adverse reactions' to the jab seem to often be neurological (and stunningly acute in a lot of cases), and neural tissues are generally less able to recover than most others. Heart inflammation is another one, and is of some concern. In the tiny rural community I grew up in, at least two of my close associates need heart transplants in their 40's. It is supposed that an unusual virus went around decades earlier. I didn't think to much about it until much later in life when I discovered how common it was for biological weapons development efforts to be doing testing on the domestic populations. Also after putting some research into things, how vastly more useful are 'non-lethal' biological weapons which have a long term influence on a population.
The numbers on this are inconsistent and are from iffy sources. Even so, this doesn't negate anything about the need to vaccinate the population.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01442-9