I did.
Then you should probably know the distinct difference in the tone for both candidates in both of the campaigns. It is obvious that there is a clear bias for one over another. It is in no way, a balanced and clear perspective for either of the candidates or else I would expect a little bit more factual and nuanced perspective in those signatures.
Hint: Mans pretty fond of DJT
I don't say that it's wrong to support Trump or wrong to support Harris by wearing a signature campaign. I only wonder that does personal texts and description information given in these designs are correct for those nominees.
That is not directed to your reply.
I tried to search a personal text for Kamala Harris, and wondered did she said so, but did not find a match result. Honestly I knew she is keen on socialism, communism but not sure what she said and I thought personal text should be matched with her saying.
I'm not here to talk about politics. We're not here to police for fake news or whatever, I believe that the onus should be on the users to verify whether she's (and he for the matter) into socialism, communism, or whatever. Again, my definition of communism might be slightly different from his so I can't really be bothered to argue that.
Doubt that it would actually make a difference in the results but the signature and the narratives does make for a pretty good laugh.