Does XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Facts here!

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 02:24:04 PM

If more fuds on this thread, I will close it and open a self-mod one. I am looking for simple facts, nothing is complicated at all.

hahaha pussy!

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 16, 2014, 02:32:01 PM

Huh?

If you can't find a multisig address with transactions associated with it on the XC blockchain, then why don't you create your own multisig address and do some transactions with it to see how it works? Yes, I could do this myself in the time it took me to make this post, but I am not going to do it. You can do it yourself because you are the one who wants to see how it works. Do your own research, please.

If there are indeed no multisig addresses on the blockchain with transactions associated with them, then the only thing that proves is that no one has used multisig on the XC blockchain. It most certainly does not prove that this feature has not been implemented.

I tried to tell them the hole time.. They don't listen

infinitechaos

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 02:22:47 PM

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 16, 2014, 02:20:38 PM

Why can't you do it yourself?

I see no reason why you need someone else to show you a multisig address with transactions associated with it when you can accomplish this on your own.

Because no one can find it, if it is really there, then 30 sec, worth all these posts? I am sure it took you more than 30 sec to do you post.

The simple fact is: THEY CAN NOT PROVIDE THE SIMPLE INFO, Because it is not there!

Huh?

If you can't find a multisig address with transactions associated with it on the XC blockchain, then why don't you create your own multisig address and do some transactions with it to see how it works? Yes, I could do this myself in the time it took me to make this post, but I am not going to do it. You can do it yourself because you are the one who wants to see how it works. Do your own research, please.

If there are indeed no multisig addresses on the blockchain with transactions associated with them, then the only thing that proves is that no one has used multisig on the XC blockchain. It most certainly does not prove that this feature has not been implemented.

btcsup

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

Who is the first one will ask ATCSECURE again multisig wallet or get the dev banned here i have my proofs

Quote from: btcsup on August 16, 2014, 01:49:59 PM

I have a real proof atcsecure xc dev posted on mammothcoin thread let me upload wait, he said this is as multisig

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm (This is atc secure multisig wallet Grin

lol see how he tries to cheat without fear)

see how he tries like he does not need whitepaper at all (!)...

he as big developer saying first he does not need whitepaper at all, second advising poor mammoth dev to check multisig...

This the amazing technology how to cheat people using charisma.

But he is stupid enough to post non multisig address

timerland

hero member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 596

If more fuds on this thread, I will close it and open a self-mod one. I am looking for simple facts, nothing is complicated at all.

btcsup

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

I have a real proof atcsecure xc dev posted on mammothcoin thread let me upload wait, he said this is as multisig

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm (This is atc secure multisig wallet Grin

lol see how he tries to cheat without fear another dev)

see how he tries like he does not need whitepaper at all (!)...

he as big developer saying first he does not need whitepaper at all, second advising poor mammoth dev to check multisig...

This the amazing technology how to cheat people using charisma.

But he is stupid enough to post non multisig address

timerland

hero member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 596

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 16, 2014, 02:20:38 PM

Quote from: some138 on August 16, 2014, 02:05:45 PM

Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions.

Why can't you do it yourself?

I see no reason why you need someone else to show you a multisig address with transactions associated with it when you can accomplish this on your own.

Because no one can find it, if it is really there, then 30 sec, worth all these posts? I am sure it took you more than 30 sec to do you post.

The simple fact is: THEY CAN NOT PROVIDE THE SIMPLE INFO, Because it is not there!

timerland

hero member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 596

FUDs do not help here, simple questions, and simple answers. Very clear facts.

infinitechaos

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: some138 on August 16, 2014, 02:05:45 PM

Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions.

Why can't you do it yourself?

I see no reason why you need someone else to show you a multisig address with transactions associated with it when you can accomplish this on your own.

BrewCrewFan

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 501

Quote from: btcsup on August 16, 2014, 02:13:17 PM

LIES are not sustainable
XC LIES YOU CAN LIE BUT WE SPEAK TRUTH

Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 02:08:33 PM

----- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS SPEAKING TRUTH ABOUT XC HYPE -----

Agreed!

----- ---- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS SPEAKING TRUTH ABOUT XC HYPE -----

Right, Just like every dang attempt over the past months form other coins to disprove just about everything with the coin. I am sure as with all the past stuff, you guys will eat crow soon enough. Get your salt and pepper ready.

Quote from: Rnbin on August 16, 2014, 02:13:39 PM

Stop the fud already. What are you even trying to achieve ? Let XC be and especially leave SUPER out of this. I believe you guys are mainly MAMM investors since I haven't really heard of many of the fudders here, so if you want to represent MAMM that's fine but don't promote SUPER in your fud. We do not support these kind of talks in any way, nor does the supercointeam.

Quote from: supercointeam on August 16, 2014, 01:21:44 PM

Quote from: Rnbin on August 16, 2014, 12:54:10 PM

Quote from: supercointeam on August 16, 2014, 12:35:45 PM

We do not make competition (...)

Tell that to MAMM, they really need to chill out with the fud

I agree, really no need to attack anyone. I will talk about this with MAMM team soon.

Come on now, dont be silly. You know exactly what they are trying to do.

Rnbin

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Stop the fud already. What are you even trying to achieve ? Let XC be and especially leave SUPER out of this. I believe you guys are mainly MAMM investors since I haven't really heard of many of the fudders here, so if you want to represent MAMM that's fine but don't promote SUPER in your fud. We do not support these kind of talks in any way, nor does the supercointeam.

Quote from: supercointeam on August 16, 2014, 01:21:44 PM

Quote from: Rnbin on August 16, 2014, 12:54:10 PM

Quote from: supercointeam on August 16, 2014, 12:35:45 PM

We do not make competition (...)

Tell that to MAMM, they really need to chill out with the fud

I agree, really no need to attack anyone. I will talk about this with MAMM team soon.

btcsup

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

LIES are not sustainable
XC LIES YOU CAN LIE BUT WE SPEAK TRUTH

Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 02:08:33 PM

----- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS SPEAKING TRUTH ABOUT XC HYPE -----

Agreed!

----- ---- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS SPEAKING TRUTH ABOUT XC HYPE -----

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

----- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS A SUPER / MAMM PROMOTIONAL THREAD -----

Quote from: dadon on August 16, 2014, 02:07:08 PM

Enjoy you smear campaign i got better shit to do, btw cheplin from DRK pulled XC apart looking for problems if there was one the whole forum would know about it but he could find nothing so this whole thread is a joke, enjoy rubbing each others ego's.

Agreed!

----- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS A SUPER / MAMM PROMOTIONAL THREAD -----

dadon

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1002

Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.

Enjoy you smear campaign i got better shit to do, btw cheplin from DRK pulled XC apart looking for problems if there was one the whole forum would know about it but he could find nothing so this whole thread is a joke, enjoy rubbing each others ego's.

some138

full member

Activity: 271

Merit: 101

lol, XC supporters, you try to use my example of XC multisig addresses to support your argument??

I created them to SHOW YOU what is a XC multisig address, since you never saw them before Grin

Now please show me in your **blockchain** a multisig address with transactions associated with it, so people can see how it worked. You don't create a multisig address for fun, you use it for some transactions.

So stupid and desperate, oh well...

btcsup

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

@dadon tell us that because no body will understand lies behind XC because nobody knows multisig and they will keep going with XC like this.

No problem there Grin

Because people are idiots already believing.

dadon

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1002

Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 01:56:30 PM

Quote from: greenclover on August 16, 2014, 01:49:36 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 01:46:38 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 01:42:35 PM

For those who are still "confused", let me repeat again:

XC claimed to have implemented multisig. If this is true, then it is trivial to provide some multisig addresses with multisig tx associated with them, that we can see and inspect in the blockchain.

Saying implemented multisig but unable to provide even one multisig address? That dev provided some links deemed to be multisig transactions, but we don't even see one single multisig address there. He keep talking m-of-m (a joke for those who know what is multisig for), and provided regular addresses as multisig addresses, do you think he knows anything about multisig?

Some community members just show what a true XC multisig address look like. Now if you continue claim XC has it, show everyone the address and tx in the blockchain. Nothing is simpler, and let's not waste our (and everyone's) time by arguing. There's nothing to argue here, just show the facts! Experts know what you are talking about.

And like stated before: Why do you want us to provide this information? You can do it all yourself it seems..

Instead of coming to our Community and build some trust to get us explaining you things you make a thread with stupid claims that don't hold any grounds.

Is it worth arguing like this? If you have it, it will take you 30 sec to provide the info. Want a mammothcoin multisig address with transactions associated with it, and inspect from blockchain explorer? I can provide that to you in 30 sec.

If you do not have it and can not provide it, don't waste time here. You don't fool people here.

I see arguments over arguments, XC supporters, don't waste time please. As people said, it takes 30sec to provide a multisig address and tx. There are 100s in the Mammothcoin blockchain, I can give you one in 30 sec. Why not show yours? With so many posts and I don't see a single one? Anyone with IQ > 80 can conclude correctly what it means.

DO NOT WASTE TIME

LOL there are millions of people in the world with IQ's above 80 who don't know what the fuck multi sig is dickhead...

timerland

hero member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 596

Quote from: greenclover on August 16, 2014, 01:49:36 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 01:46:38 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 01:42:35 PM

For those who are still "confused", let me repeat again:

XC claimed to have implemented multisig. If this is true, then it is trivial to provide some multisig addresses with multisig tx associated with them, that we can see and inspect in the blockchain.

Saying implemented multisig but unable to provide even one multisig address? That dev provided some links deemed to be multisig transactions, but we don't even see one single multisig address there. He keep talking m-of-m (a joke for those who know what is multisig for), and provided regular addresses as multisig addresses, do you think he knows anything about multisig?

Some community members just show what a true XC multisig address look like. Now if you continue claim XC has it, show everyone the address and tx in the blockchain. Nothing is simpler, and let's not waste our (and everyone's) time by arguing. There's nothing to argue here, just show the facts! Experts know what you are talking about.

And like stated before: Why do you want us to provide this information? You can do it all yourself it seems..

Instead of coming to our Community and build some trust to get us explaining you things you make a thread with stupid claims that don't hold any grounds.

Is it worth arguing like this? If you have it, it will take you 30 sec to provide the info. Want a mammothcoin multisig address with transactions associated with it, and inspect from blockchain explorer? I can provide that to you in 30 sec.

If you do not have it and can not provide it, don't waste time here. You don't fool people here.

I see arguments over arguments, XC supporters, don't waste time please. As people said, it takes 30sec to provide a multisig address and tx. There are 100s in the Mammothcoin blockchain, I can give you one in 30 sec. Why not show yours? With so many posts and I don't see a single one? Anyone with IQ > 80 can conclude correctly what it means.

DO NOT WASTE TIME

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: therightmintality on August 16, 2014, 01:52:54 PM

[statement]

Yeah, you're right. But it hurts to see all those new people in crypto get burned by this. Did you take a look at the threads of these coins. Circle Jerking all the way. Even by the dev's :S

greenclover

full member

Activity: 195

Merit: 100

Quote from: btcsup on August 16, 2014, 01:49:59 PM

I have proof atc secure posted on mammothcoin thread let me upload wait, he said this is as multisig

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

lmao, where is the multisig address for XC? trying to cheat and fool people?? Grin

therightmintality

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: SushiChef on August 16, 2014, 01:46:38 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 16, 2014, 01:42:35 PM

For those who are still "confused", let me repeat again:

XC claimed to have implemented multisig. If this is true, then it is trivial to provide some multisig addresses with multisig tx associated with them, that we can see and inspect in the blockchain.

Saying implemented multisig but unable to provide even one multisig address? That dev provided some links deemed to be multisig transactions, but we don't even see one single multisig address there. He keep talking m-of-m (a joke for those who know what is multisig for), and provided regular addresses as multisig addresses, do you think he knows anything about multisig?

Some community members just show what a true XC multisig address look like. Now if you continue claim XC has it, show everyone the address and tx in the blockchain. Nothing is simpler, and let's not waste our (and everyone's) time by arguing. There's nothing to argue here, just show the facts! Experts know what you are talking about.

And like stated before: Why do you want us to provide this information? You can do it all yourself it seems..

Instead of coming to our Community and build some trust to get us explaining you things you make a thread with stupid claims that don't hold any grounds.

Sushi, it's not worth it. XC is a community that tries to be respectful to other coins and not FUD. We are mostly a very mature community. Obviously these folks are not mature and must be quite young. I don't think they are doing any favors for Supercoin. Real money doesn't want join a coin that has this type of people in their forum.

Topic: Does XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Facts here! (Read 5011 times)