Topic: Does XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Facts here! - page 2. (Read 5011 times)

I have a real proof atcsecure xc dev posted on mammothcoin thread let me upload wait, he said this is as multisig

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm (This is atc secure multisig wallet   lol see how he tries to cheat without fear)

see how he tries like he does not need whitepaper at all (!)...




he as big developer saying first he does not need whitepaper at all, second advising poor mammoth dev to check multisig...

This the amazing technology how to cheat people using charisma.

But he is stupid enough to post non multisig address

Is it worth arguing like this? If you have it, it will take you 30 sec to provide the info. Want a mammothcoin multisig address with transactions associated with it, and inspect from blockchain explorer? I can provide that to you in 30 sec.

If you do not have it and can not provide it, don't waste time here. You don't fool people here.

OK, so we are clear then that XC is using multisig and the OP is FUD. Thanks for clearing that up.

Synechist (who posted the transactions) is not a dev, he is PR, so I guess he made a mistake. (I dont know, Im not technical either)

I can assure you Dan (ATC Secure) Knows exactly what he is doing code wise.

yes nothing is simpler, just show the facts. so many fuds do not help. they just try to confuse people. Looks like the revelation of the cheating really touch some people's nerve

And like stated before: Why do you want us to provide this information? You can do it all yourself it seems..

Instead of coming to our Community and build some trust to get us explaining you things you make a thread with stupid claims that don't hold any grounds.

Man you guys are going to look stupid when what you are slandering all over this forum is proven wrong, I'm just an investor i have no technical knowlege but i can say with complete confidence that various SR members of this forum have confirmed that multi sig works so get ready to be put in your places, and the shit you have said about XC Dev is disgusting you should really look in the mirror and examine the sort of people you are.

For those who are still "confused", let me repeat again:

XC claimed to have implemented multisig. If this is true, then it is trivial to provide some multisig addresses with multisig tx associated with them, that we can see and inspect in the blockchain.

Saying implemented multisig but unable to provide even one multisig address? That dev provided some links deemed to be multisig transactions, but we don't even see one single multisig address there. He keep talking m-of-m (a joke for those who know what is multisig for), and provided regular addresses as multisig addresses, do you think he knows anything about multisig?

A community member just showed what a true XC multisig address look like. Now if you continue claim XC has it, show everyone a multisig address and tx in the blockchain. Nothing is simpler, and let's not waste our (and everyone's) time by arguing. There's nothing to argue here, just show the facts! Experts know what you are talking about.

Synechist is not XC Dev for a start. He is the poor bastard who has to deal with FUD like this all the time.

Also, i am confused now by what the problem is, above you have posted multisig addresses, doesn't this disprove the OP?

Still i'm confused. You say no multisig is implemented but just some posts above someone (from your own team) produced a multisig address

 

Please tell me again what is the problem?

XC devs, please explain the facts and stop cheating!!

The problem? XC claimed they implemented multisig. People asked them to show an example of multisig address in their blockchain, the dev posted two links showing only the regular XC addresses. Then some138 created real XC multisig addresses and show them what it look like.

From the posts here I can see that XC never implemented multisig in the coin, otherwise it will be very easy for them to show a multisig address and tx associated with that address in the blockchain.

For mammothcoin, you find tons of multisig addresses and tx associated with the addresses. You know they actually implemented it.

Wow...there is something deeply wrong with you isn't there...

So what is the problem? I'm confused.. first there was no multisig and now you say there is...

 

thank you some138 for showing the truth and facts, I was going to create a multisig address to show them too.

wow, thanks some138 to show us what are the real multisig addresses in XC.

From what XC's dev's post, and the "multisig" tx and address they provided in the above links, I can say that they did not understand what is a multisig, they mixed multi input/out tx with multisig? Anyway, they did not seem to implement the multisig at all. Looks like they've been cheating all the way along (consciously or unconsciously).

Multisig addresses usually start with a different letter than their regular address. For example, Bitcoin's regular address starts with "1", its multisig address starts with "3". Supercoin's regular address starts with "S", its multisig address starts with "C". Mammothcoin's regular address starts with "M", its multisig address starts with "b". etc. For XC, its regular address starts with X and multisig address starts with "4". Everyone can create a multisig address using XC client and verify yourself.

Really grown up! What do you want to achieve with this? You really think no one has looked into this and you have found some real flaw in XC?

Look at this. Dirty XC stop cheating people, It's a Shame on you!

Hi,

The supercointeam is not supporting this, the team even stated before that we do not participate doing dirty competition, not with any coin. Secondly, fud about XC or other coins gets deleted in supercoin thread.

And I as a supercoin supporter think we shouldn't promote ourselves with talk like this either. If people have legit questions about XC and are seeking for an answer, they may do this but they should leave supercoin out of this. We (supercoin community) are not looking for an answer from XC on this matter, only a few individuals are. It's not because some hold a couple of Supercoins, that they speak in name of the whole community. And they especially don't when they are holding MAMM coins.

OK, for those from XC who never seen a real XC multisig address, let me show you what it is, and you can tell me if there are any exist today on the blockchain

All the one posted in the above links by synechist are regular XC addresses, they are not multisig addresses, why? because XC's multisig address starts with 4, not X.

I downloaded XC wallet, and from there in console, I created 2 multisig addresses.

I used these 3 private-public key pairs:

public key: 033942099d7fb91a51b0e2899040c36cf5337002f43b2e80ec3afe3c81cbb5a3db
private key: X35fMeU3c159SX4tWVnA7ZW7DxTyw7BCqEmt92Nw5N87kezytJSZ

public key: 02733ae45bf1d7fc5b24dcdbf54c0dd2b106a39233e65cdb47fd0fd925734f4b83
private key: X7oy79myB5WmKXAjey6oZPfo12BHmwRfD9k4rmL2oYUMdjff48NU

public key: 02307e5d3924fa8d95093ed61bfa4ecb4bf108196013ee1de466589bcf3fb212b8
private key: X2z4smxErHnkVBZnWzfPMDMNdMvD3mAnB7w7YD1BFeppf3iqUyWJ

these pairs are derived from the addresses I have. From there I created 2 addresses: 2-of-3 multisig address and 3-of-3 multisig address (though this one is of no use - just to show):

2-of-3 multisig address: 4ShqMQFoQFLBzhXDs3aJJMnDNLZ9JTrxKH
3-of-3 multisig address: 4XCmiwfQCm6gQNrW6kaXZJawLPekQGQf5o

BTW, you can make some deposits to 2-of-3 multisig address, and I can show you how to spend it. I can do a tutorial for you guys who have no ideas on what is a multisig address.

these are multi-in/out tx, they are not multisig tx, I don't even see a multisig address there. They are all regular XC addresses.