Does XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Facts here! - page 3.

some138

full member

Activity: 271

Merit: 101

Quote from: adhitthana on August 16, 2014, 07:12:36 AM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

But I am puzzled by the fact that despite they talk like this, I don't see a single multisig address in XC nor do I see any multisig tx. As we all know, these are the central parts, if we do use this technology,

Except multi-sig is only part of what XC is doing. With XC we have a developer who is very interested in the underlying issues and concepts, and a man who has some very relevant technical experience in the field.
So we have something a bit different, an entire platform with many different facets.

using m-of-m multisig, lmao Grin

what can you do with a m-of-m multisig? looks like the dev got only the name, and used it wrong Cool

timerland

hero member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 596

Quote from: synechist on August 16, 2014, 06:08:05 AM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?

Would these satisfy your curiosity?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

You're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.

Quote

m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?

So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.

- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.

- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.

You're not very civil are you?

Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.

If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask, nicely.

these?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

you made me laugh, where are multisig addresses?? these are all regular XC addresses. Do you want me to create a XC multi-address for you? Do you know how multisig address look like? You try to cheat an expert here?

Tell me, how you create a multisig address?

Also do you know how multisig address is used? what do you do with a m-of-m address? if there's a cheater being o1 of m, then what can you do anything with the address? your fund will be locked forever on that address! You can not do a thing, because you can't get the cheater to sign any transaction for you. Multisig is used mostly for m-of-n, where m < n for evident reasons.

You keep talking m-of-m, meaning you understand nothing about multisig. Don't pretent an expert here. Many people in this thread understand what they talk, you can't fool people here.

counter

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 500

Time is on our side, yes it is!

Why start a thread that gives no proof and expect there to be some kind of positive outcome. Don't know why OP didn't take the time to try for their self instead of this nonsense. It's clear you have a coin in mind that you want to hype which only makes you more discredited if you ask me. Next time less fud and more thinking before posting would be beneficial for everyone.

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: battbot on August 16, 2014, 11:35:21 AM

Quote from: synechist on August 16, 2014, 06:08:05 AM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?

Would these satisfy your curiosity?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

You're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.

Quote

m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?

So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.

- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.

- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.

You're not very civil are you?

Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.

If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask, nicely.

yeah lemme quote that one more time, just because I didnt get enough of that already. Currently touching myself to multisig whitepapers.

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: synechist on August 16, 2014, 06:08:05 AM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?

Would these satisfy your curiosity?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

You're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.

Quote

m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?

So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.

- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.

- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.

You're not very civil are you?

Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.

If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask, nicely.

shockstar

full member

Activity: 141

Merit: 100

OHHHHHHHHHHH I LOVE TINKY WINKY

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Can I be the Purple one?!?! PLEAAAAASEEEEEE

yurimir

legendary

Activity: 1554

Merit: 1044

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 10:48:53 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on August 15, 2014, 09:13:36 PM

Quote from: greenclover on August 15, 2014, 09:08:33 PM

Quote from: SushiChef on August 15, 2014, 09:00:11 PM

Just so everyone knows, ATCsecure is releasing a whitepaper this weekend to explain The Tech! That will clarify all questions

a whitepaper does not solve much, I asked a very very simple question (nothing is simpler if they already implemented it):

- Can you please point to me some XC's multisig addresses and their transactions, so I can verify independently if the multisig is indeed implemented as you claimed.

If I want an example from Mammthcoin, I can get it in less than 30 sec in their thread.

Can anyone do me a favor and provide me the info I want? Again nothing is simpler, if it is there already

Why you need us to provide this Intel? Also asking in such a negative way is not helping in getting support from XC community

No need to waste time, just provide info. Fact is fact, you can write 1000 pages, still equal ZERO, show your facts!

Show your facts!

therightmintality

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 10:52:45 PM

Quote from: therightmintality on August 15, 2014, 10:24:30 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:52:03 PM

Quote from: greenclover on August 15, 2014, 08:50:36 PM

that's exactly the questions I asked in their thread, glad you posted a thread to discuss it. thanks.

I have this question myself for some time, I saw your message in their thread. It's better have a separate thread to discuss it.

I would suggest you look at XC's Dev, Dan Metcalf's resume, and see that he is quite capable of what he says. Also, you will have a nice shot at a very nice bounty very soon with the 3.0 release and a look at the whitepaper coming out soon.

Resume does not mean anything, do you know satoshi's resume? People put all bullshits in their resumes. If the XC truly supports multisig, just show a multisig address as greenclover asked. Very simple.

If you ask me whether Mammothcoin / supercoin's supersend really support multisig or not, I can show you their multisig address/tx in 10 secs, very easy. So don't talk garbage here, show the facts.

Facts provided, and resumes do mean something when previous work is factually documented and anonymity of an alt coin developer does spell trouble. Oh, also, sweet profile pic. You can come join the XC community, it's not too late.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: demgains on August 16, 2014, 09:44:46 AM

Quote from: synechist on August 16, 2014, 06:08:05 AM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?

Would these satisfy your curiosity?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

You're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.

Quote

m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?

So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.

- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.

- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.

You're not very civil are you?

Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.

If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask, nicely.

my suggestion to them was to download the wallet and try it out for themselves. I have no respect for people who are too incompetent to discover their own answers to these question (which by the way is quite simple, and it also forces them to buy XC

)

Indeed.

It suggests that the intention was to spread FUD rather than to engage constructively.

One of the funny things about all this is that anyone claiming they've "done multisig properly" has not thereby achieved something (sorry Mammothcoin). Multisig doth not an anoncoin make, especially if you're using a non-trustless mixer).

What a weird thing to base one's superiority on. ;-)

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

This topic is such bullshit. Purposefully designed to try and damage XC's reputation.

Supercoin and Mammothcoin need to be careful.

They are quickly building a dirty reputation as spreading bullshit about the competition.

Mud sticks.

I'm basing this on multiple posts and topics; XC supporters are well aware about this.

demgains

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: synechist on August 16, 2014, 06:08:05 AM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?

Would these satisfy your curiosity?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

You're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.

Quote

m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?

So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.

- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.

- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.

You're not very civil are you?

Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.

If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask, nicely.

my suggestion to them was to download the wallet and try it out for themselves. I have no respect for people who are too incompetent to discover their own answers to these question (which by the way is quite simple, and it also forces them to buy XC

)

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

I updated my first page messages so they contain synechist answer!

Wanted to wish the dev's and supporters of mamm/Super the best of luck in The future! One piece of advise; if you want million dollar investments into your project you better grow up and start being more professional in your presentation to the outside world.

You made a fool out of yourself and I can't take anything you say serious

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Fudder going to fud. LOL. These Supercoin/Mammothcoin trolls just can't help themselves.

adhitthana

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

But I am puzzled by the fact that despite they talk like this, I don't see a single multisig address in XC nor do I see any multisig tx. As we all know, these are the central parts, if we do use this technology,

Except multi-sig is only part of what XC is doing. With XC we have a developer who is very interested in the underlying issues and concepts, and a man who has some very relevant technical experience in the field.
So we have something a bit different, an entire platform with many different facets.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:47:03 PM

Can anyone show me XC's multisig addresses and their associated transactions?

Would these satisfy your curiosity?
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?62014.htm
- http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm

You're an arse for fudding instead of just downloading the wallet and trying out Privacy Mode.

Quote

m-of-m multisig? Are you drunk? What fun will you have to have m-of-m multisig?? If one guy is bad then you want the wallet is locked forever?

So, your reasoning process:
- timerland doesn't understand the point of m-of-m multisig.

- timerland doesn't bother to ask people from XC what m-of-m is used for.

- timerland simply concludes, with the foolhardiness of a drunk pullet, that the truth is not that he lacks understanding but that XC is a scam.

You're not very civil are you?

Just come and ask us questions next time instead of creating a fruitless and irritating FUD thread.

If you have further questions, you're welcome to ask, nicely.

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 10:52:45 PM

Quote from: therightmintality on August 15, 2014, 10:24:30 PM

Quote from: timerland on August 15, 2014, 08:52:03 PM

Quote from: greenclover on August 15, 2014, 08:50:36 PM

that's exactly the questions I asked in their thread, glad you posted a thread to discuss it. thanks.

I have this question myself for some time, I saw your message in their thread. It's better have a separate thread to discuss it.

I would suggest you look at XC's Dev, Dan Metcalf's resume, and see that he is quite capable of what he says. Also, you will have a nice shot at a very nice bounty very soon with the 3.0 release and a look at the whitepaper coming out soon.

Resume does not mean anything, do you know satoshi's resume? People put all bullshits in their resumes. If the XC truly supports multisig, just show a multisig address as greenclover asked. Very simple.

If you ask me whether Mammothcoin / supercoin's supersend really support multisig or not, I can show you their multisig address/tx in 10 secs, very easy. So don't talk garbage here, show the facts.

hmm... noob question here, but i want to figure this out.

what exactly is a multisig address? i thought the multisig is to ensure that no coins are stolen on anon transactions, ergo it is trustless. but why would you store it on the blockchain?
or is a multisig address kind of a stealth address? because those are in the works since XChat rev is finished.

YESEYEneedDIGI

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Without even reading this properly i can tell you it's a Super/Mammouth coin yuppie writing this, I mean really think about it, Mammouth Coin, say it out loud right now a few times and ask yourself, is this the future........ Mammouths are Extinct and Coins is just following the garden path to try and succeed off Bitcoins back.

XC is next Generation XCurrency, it is break through technology following a new path which Super and Mammouth are trying to follow. The truth is a bunch of yuppies missed the XC Boat and are trying to create a life raft.

The fact XC development didn't get involved in these attempts by yuppie "Coins" to make a quick profit off the hard work of the next Generation XC XCurrency, goes to show just how dedicated and professional they are. It wouldn't surprise me if a public Launch of the Currency happened soon to.

adhitthana

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

Sorry guys, with over 1000 pages on the XC thread I can't find where this was dealt with, but it is some time ago. There are just too many pages. The best way, the surest way, is to test it yourself.

nomad13666

legendary

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Topic: Does XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Facts here! - page 3. (Read 5011 times)