Pages:
Author

Topic: Does XC uses multisig address and transaction? The answer is NO!! Facts here! - page 4. (Read 5011 times)

legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
+100000
Post up multi-sig block-chian proof please - I have had these concerns for a while.
Did you test for yourself?
Have you followed the developments made public in various XC discussions?
This is the big problem with people today they expect everything to be given, and want other people to do the work for them, i got a harsh reality for all people who think this way, you will fail miserably in all aspects of life, business, relationships, investments etc life is a two way street no one cares what u want u have to care enough to go get it yourself.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
+100000
Post up multi-sig block-chian proof please - I have had these concerns for a while.
Did you test for yourself?
Have you followed the developments made public in various XC discussions?

Added in edit:
The important thing IMHO to show is not that a transaction can't be followed superficially on the blockchain but that it is also immune from various strategies to identify transactions via other means than merely the addresses.
XC went through this long ago, and not only that, but XC had someone who really wanted to disprove it fail to do so, someone involved with DRK and who is quite bright.
Have any other privacy coins had this done?
Mammoth from what I understand has shown that it can obscure the path of transactions, but it was shown by those who wanted mammoth to succeed. This doesn't mean it doesn't work, but it's not quite as good IMHO
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
How about no... go read the thread no one cares if any of you invest...no one owes you any explanation, god gave you a brain, and a pair of eyes so use them.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
+100000
Post up multi-sig block-chian proof please - I have had these concerns for a while.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
It is always nice to see people called out in clear, concise language and then just have to sit back to see how they respond.
Or not respond. I guess the people who like XC, will buy XC, and the people who like Mammoth or other coins will buy those coins.
Mammoth could go up ten times its current price is and it would still be way cheaper than XC.
So it's pretty clear what to do.
But I should disclose that I bought quite a few Mamm around the 250 Satoshi mark, so I don't mind if it goes up.
I would have thought the smart thing to do for people who really believe the Mammoth story would have been to buy Mammoth rather than trash other coins.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
This is pathetic lol  Roll Eyes XC sure makes you guys scared hey...everything you want to know is in our thread, if you want to know read it, why should we do the work for you just to prove you wrong, we don't care....and  there is a month old bounty still unclaimed for 2 BTC if you can connect the sender to receiver address, so go ahead knock yourselves out, cheplin from DRK did..it was extremely amusing he wanted that BTC but he...failed and gave up, now you can fail and give up while we all watch...have fun.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 339
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
Have any one watched this video?
Yes..what about it?
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
I don't mind of Mamm goes up. Though I don't think it will rival XC. But ..who knows. Smiley Here are my most recent purchases. Smiley

Quote
CLOSED DATE   OPENED DATE   TYPE   BID/ASK   UNITS FILLED MAMM   UNITS TOTAL MAMM   ACTUAL RATE   COST / PROCEEDS
08/13/2014 08:57:10   08/11/2014 10:01:41   Sell Partial   0.00000650   103.64185073   5000.00000000   0.00000649   0.00067199
08/11/2014 10:23:37   08/11/2014 10:02:25   Sell Partial   0.00000600   1195.23863612   5000.00000000   0.00000604   0.00720535
08/04/2014 20:17:00   08/02/2014 19:49:25   Buy   0.00000260   10000.00000000   10000.00000000   0.00000259   0.02606498
08/01/2014 05:37:01   07/31/2014 16:08:50   Buy   0.00000250   10000.00000000   10000.00000000   0.00000250   0.02506249
07/30/2014 16:22:25   07/30/2014 08:39:18   Buy   0.00000231   10000.00000000   10000.00000000   0.00000230   0.02313224
07/30/2014 06:57:20   07/30/2014 06:57:19   Buy   0.00000261   10000.00000000   10000.00000000   0.00000261   0.02616525

The mammothcoin dev wants the coin to be in the top 3 coins. I hope he succeeds after buying so cheaply. Smiley
Quote from: Mammothcoin
We have great technology and purpose. I want to see mammoth top 3 famous coins in 2 months and i need help from you to do this.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
XC absolutely have nothing, just cheating. Their supporters must ask from dev (the authority lol.) pay for their potential loses in the future!

They seem buzz words experts but absulately not multisig  Grin
Are you the Mammoth coin dev, posting under another account? Your English usage is very similar.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
I thought the mammoth went extinct?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
that's exactly the questions I asked in their thread, glad you posted a thread to discuss it. thanks.

I have this question myself for some time, I saw your message in their thread. It's better have a separate thread to discuss it.

I would suggest you look at XC's Dev, Dan Metcalf's resume, and see that he is quite capable of what he says.   Also, you will have a nice shot at a very nice bounty very soon with the 3.0 release and a look at the whitepaper coming out soon.  

Resume does not mean anything, do you know satoshi's resume? People put all bullshits in their resumes. If the XC truly supports multisig, just show a multisig address as greenclover asked. Very simple.

If you ask me whether Mammothcoin / supercoin's supersend really support multisig or not, I can show you their multisig address/tx in 10 secs, very easy. So don't talk garbage here, show the facts.


It is always nice to see people called out in clear, concise language and then just have to sit back to see how they respond. So, how about it? Can anyone post details of multisig tx in XC?

What clear and concise language? It appears most of your fudcrew lack the basic grammar skills required to construct a simple sentence. Half of you sound like cavemen, enjoy your woolly mammoth :-)
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
no need to feed these stupid trolls here.

only purpose of these stupid morons are drawing some pathetic attention to them

fail.
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 104
that's exactly the questions I asked in their thread, glad you posted a thread to discuss it. thanks.

I have this question myself for some time, I saw your message in their thread. It's better have a separate thread to discuss it.

I would suggest you look at XC's Dev, Dan Metcalf's resume, and see that he is quite capable of what he says.   Also, you will have a nice shot at a very nice bounty very soon with the 3.0 release and a look at the whitepaper coming out soon.   

Resume does not mean anything, do you know satoshi's resume? People put all bullshits in their resumes. If the XC truly supports multisig, just show a multisig address as greenclover asked. Very simple.

If you ask me whether Mammothcoin / supercoin's supersend really support multisig or not, I can show you their multisig address/tx in 10 secs, very easy. So don't talk garbage here, show the facts.


It is always nice to see people called out in clear, concise language and then just have to sit back to see how they respond. So, how about it? Can anyone post details of multisig tx in XC?
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
XC absolutely have nothing, just cheating. Their supporters must ask from dev (the authority lol.) pay for their potential loses in the future!

They seem buzz words experts but absulately not multisig  Grin


LIES are not sustainable
XC LIES YOU CAN LIE BUT WE SPEAK TRUTH

----- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS SPEAKING TRUTH ABOUT XC HYPE -----

Agreed!

----- ---- !!WARNING!! THIS THREAD IS SPEAKING TRUTH ABOUT XC HYPE -----
full member
Activity: 136
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 136
Merit: 100

Just so everyone knows, ATCsecure is releasing a whitepaper this weekend to explain The Tech! That will clarify all questions

a whitepaper does not solve much, I asked a very very simple question (nothing is simpler if they already implemented it):

- Can you please point to me some XC's multisig addresses and their transactions, so I can verify independently if the multisig is indeed implemented as you claimed.

If I want an example from Mammthcoin, I can get it in less than 30 sec in their thread.


Can anyone do me a favor and provide me the info I want? Again nothing is simpler, if it is there already

Why you need us to provide this Intel? Also asking in such a negative way is not helping in getting support from XC community

No need to waste time, just provide info. Fact is fact, you can write 1000 pages, still equal ZERO, show your facts!

If they had it, they would not waste time here. But unfortunately they clearly don't, they just hype, and don't have real things...
hero member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 596
that's exactly the questions I asked in their thread, glad you posted a thread to discuss it. thanks.

I have this question myself for some time, I saw your message in their thread. It's better have a separate thread to discuss it.

I would suggest you look at XC's Dev, Dan Metcalf's resume, and see that he is quite capable of what he says.   Also, you will have a nice shot at a very nice bounty very soon with the 3.0 release and a look at the whitepaper coming out soon.   

Resume does not mean anything, do you know satoshi's resume? People put all bullshits in their resumes. If the XC truly supports multisig, just show a multisig address as greenclover asked. Very simple.

If you ask me whether Mammothcoin / supercoin's supersend really support multisig or not, I can show you their multisig address/tx in 10 secs, very easy. So don't talk garbage here, show the facts.

Pages:
Jump to: