The point is the security risk involved with Tik-Tok. So, it's all about security.
If the bill is passed, use it to adjudicate against the government people who passed it. After all, they are a security risk. How? By making a bill/law that takes away freedom and intellectual property rights of common people.
Of course, there are other laws they are breaking with such a bill. Adjudicate against them for breaking those other laws, as well... including their Oaths of Office.
While the GOP Focuses on TikTok, Google Prepares to Devour Everyone Whole
https://revolver.news/2023/04/while-gop-focuses-on-tiktok-google-prepares-to-devour-everyone-whole/And yet, the process of banning it is hitting a big stumbling block: Hapless lawmaking. Republican Congressman chasing for a “win” against Big Tech have instead embarrassed themselves and exposed their base to long-term tyranny at the hands of the U.S. administrative state.
Banning TikTok ought to be simple, so naturally, it’s anything but. Instead, Congress is on the precipice of “stopping” TikTok by granting vague, sweeping regulatory authority to yet another branch of the federal government. This time, instead of the FBI, CIA, or DHS, Americans will learn to fear the omnipotent powers of the Department of Commerce.
The bill in question is called the “Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act,” or as it is mercifully abbreviated, the “RESTRICT Act.” The purpose of the RESTRICT Act is, essentially, to allow the Secretary of Commerce to blacklist any tech product, service, or company linked to a “national adversary” that the Secretary considers a threat. For anything banned under the act, a whole universe of “transactions” with them become illegal, and subject to harsh penalties.
Even the press release from Senators Mark Warner and John Thune bragging about the bill’s introduction hints at its underlying problems:
The RESTRICT Act establishes a risk-based process, tailored to the rapidly changing technology and threat environment, by directing the Department of Commerce to identify and mitigate foreign threats to information and communications technology products and services....
So you are suggesting behind of this bill there is actually a plan to increase the power of the Department of Commerce, in order for them to do whatever they want with technological companies and products which happen to have any link with a foreign company/organization.
Sure, to me it sounds rather authoritarian to use this law this way. This bill was supposed to be only about Tik Tok or at the maximum, about companies (technological companies) based on China and looking to stockpile as much information from the People of the United States as possible.
I believe the problem is not the gathering of information per se, but rather the fact it is being done by the Communist Chinese Party, you know, it is a good thing when the CIA/FBI is able to spy on everyone, but it is not good when a foreign entity also manages to get that power.
People from Washintong know information is power and they are north willing to give any more power to the CCP than they already have, thanks to their manufacturing power and capabilities in the world market.