Author

Topic: Donetsk, Kharkov, Lugansk - way to Russia. - page 144. (Read 734937 times)

legendary
Activity: 992
Merit: 1000
September 20, 2014, 08:48:24 AM
Donetsk chemical plant hit by 3 TOCHKA-U ballistic missiles fired from the Ukraine army.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSyNusxBaFo&feature=youtu.be

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3bb_1411201819

It is possible this could release a toxic chemical cloud poisoning thousands of people in the Donetsk area.

Want to explain why the ukraine army would purposely destroy this chemical plant, during a "ceasefire" no less, Ukie-supporters?

Obviously because they are a bunch of genocidal scum desperate to win the war at all costs.

Also I would like to point out how delusional the people are running the show in Ukraine:

Gleb Bazov ‏@gbazov 13 min.
#LUNATIC ASYLUM MOMENT: #Geletei, #Ukraine's Min. Def., claims "Russian army" used "tactical nuclear weapons" in assault on #Lugansk airport


I mean really? Russians used tactical nukes on the lugansk airport? LOL... these people are seriously insane.
sr. member
Activity: 334
Merit: 250
September 20, 2014, 08:32:39 AM
So , there goes the argument of Germany starting the ww1 because there was a German family ruling the Austro Habsburg empire.
Exactly my point.

In the beginning of the 20th century Habsburgs were very pro-German oriented. It's completely different subject, though, and I agree... this has nothing to do with royal bloodlines.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
September 20, 2014, 08:24:11 AM
You should look into the history of the Romanov family then Wink.
Look at the origins and you're going to be amazed.

So what. It's pretty common for European royal families to have foreign bloodlines. For example, British ruling dynasty is also of German origins. They changed their family title 'Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha' to 'House of Windsor' no sooner than in WWI. Same goes for Romanian royal family (you're Romanian, right?) - it comes from the House of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. And so on.

So , there goes the argument of Germany starting the ww1 because there was a German family ruling the Austro Habsburg empire.
Exactly my point.
sr. member
Activity: 334
Merit: 250
September 20, 2014, 08:22:03 AM
You should look into the history of the Romanov family then Wink.
Look at the origins and you're going to be amazed.

So what. It's pretty common for European royal families to have foreign bloodlines. For example, British ruling dynasty is also of German origins. They changed their family name 'Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha' to 'House of Windsor' no sooner than in WWI. Same goes for Romanian royal family (you're Romanian, right?) - it comes from the House of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. And so on.
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
September 20, 2014, 05:30:47 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1WBLcZC0ag

12 tonnes of hexogen exploded at chemical plant.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
September 20, 2014, 05:24:58 AM
WWI,WWII maybe WWIII starts germans,history repeats itself
germany did not start ww1 dude you should go back to school and learn history

Not Germany but Austria-Hungary second german state led by Habsburg monarchy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria-Hungary#Creation

You should look into the history of the Romanov family then Wink.
Look at the origins and you're going to be amazed.
hero member
Activity: 697
Merit: 500
September 20, 2014, 04:02:25 AM
WWI,WWII maybe WWIII starts germans,history repeats itself
germany did not start ww1 dude you should go back to school and learn history

Not Germany but Austria-Hungary second german state led by Habsburg monarchy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austria-Hungary#Creation
sr. member
Activity: 334
Merit: 250
September 20, 2014, 02:08:20 AM
At the new round of talks in Minsk, Belarus, two parties agreed to limit the use of heavy weapons and air force in the 30-km buffer zone:

As a result of negotiations in Minsk, representatives of Ukraine and LNR/DNR agreed to reduce the use of weapons in the buffer zone between the conflicting parties. This will create a 30-kilometer zone without heavy weapons. In addition, flights of military aircraft is prohibited in the buffer zone. This was announced by the representative of Ukraine in the negotiations, ex-President Leonid Kuchma. As noted after the meeting, question of status of the LNR and DNR had not been discussed.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 19, 2014, 05:01:38 PM
ruSSian-backed forces in Eastern Ukraine now openly tweet images of 'Novorossiya Army' Russian-import T-72M3



ruSSian-backed Forces occupying E Ukraine now openly tweet images of #Mariupol outskirts burning from their attack



Picture and video from artillery fire tonight in #Mariupol



http://inforesist.org/mariupol-pod-obstrelom-grady-obstrelivayut-pozicii-sil-ato-u-samogo-goroda-video/
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
September 19, 2014, 08:53:11 AM
As per request

And yet, have you ever seen Putin intoxicated, doing anything that was not well-thought-through and balanced?

Actually I haven't seen him doing too much as I usually don't look at his statements or pictures for too long ( time needed for ctrl+f4).
Secondary , You said he doesn't drink , I showed you him with one hell of a beer , then you wanted vodka , I showed you Monsieur Putin drinking vodka...
Seriously now...


And speaking of  balanced...what's with the shoes...
Midget inferiority complex?
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
September 19, 2014, 08:32:10 AM
As per request

And yet, have you ever seen Putin intoxicated, doing anything that was not well-thought-through and balanced?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
September 19, 2014, 07:21:49 AM
WWI,WWII maybe WWIII starts germans,history repeats itself
germany did not start ww1 dude you should go back to school and learn history
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
September 19, 2014, 07:09:38 AM

I don't. At all. But yes, most drink within reasonable limits that don't affect their ability to think clearly, especially in important matters.

You're not a Russian anymore then.
Second you said first they don't drink now they drink reasonable...what it will be tomorrow I wonder Wink.


Now you are being pedantic. Besides, you were talking about vodka and then you show a beer mug...what it will be tomorrow I wonder Wink.

As for being Russian. Drinking vodka is not Russian. Traditional Russian drinks are mjod/beer and kvas. Vodka came from Finland and is a rather recent imposition.

As per request




Scholars debate the beginnings of vodka.[16] It is a contentious issue because very little historical material is available.[17][18] Vodka originated in Eastern Europe. The first production was either in Poland in the 8th century or in the area of today's Russia in the late 9th century according to different sources.[16][19] According to the Gin and Vodka Association (GVA),[19] the first distillery was documented over three hundred years later at Khlynovsk as reported in the Vyatka Chronicle of 1174. For many centuries, beverages differed significantly compared to the vodka of today, as the spirit at that time had a different flavor, color and smell, and was originally used as medicine.[19] It contained little alcohol, an estimated maximum of about 14%, as only this amount can be attained by natural fermentation. The still, allowing for distillation ("burning of wine") and increased purity and alcohol content was invented in the 8th century
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
September 19, 2014, 06:51:54 AM

I don't. At all. But yes, most drink within reasonable limits that don't affect their ability to think clearly, especially in important matters.

You're not a Russian anymore then.
Second you said first they don't drink now they drink reasonable...what it will be tomorrow I wonder Wink.


Now you are being pedantic. Besides, you were talking about vodka and then you show a beer mug...what it will be tomorrow I wonder Wink.

As for being Russian. Drinking vodka is not Russian. Traditional Russian drinks are mjod/beer and kvas. Vodka came from Finland and is a rather recent imposition.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
September 19, 2014, 06:11:57 AM

Vodka driven politics leads to destruction.


You know, I wholeheartedly agree with you there. Yeltsin, and the almost-destruction of Russia by Washington puppeteers steering Yeltsin, is a prime example.

It's good to know that the current political leaders of Russia do not drink alcohol. So you shouldn't be too agitated for Russia's fate now, unless Washington manages to conduct a coup in Russia, like they did in Ukraine, and install a new drunkard at the helm.



Everyone does Nemo Wink

I don't. At all. But yes, most drink within reasonable limits that don't affect their ability to think clearly, especially in important matters.

You're not a Russian anymore then.
Second you said first they don't drink now they drink reasonable...what it will be tomorrow I wonder Wink.

legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
September 19, 2014, 06:09:09 AM

Vodka driven politics leads to destruction.


You know, I wholeheartedly agree with you there. Yeltsin, and the almost-destruction of Russia by Washington puppeteers steering Yeltsin, is a prime example.

It's good to know that the current political leaders of Russia do not drink alcohol. So you shouldn't be too agitated for Russia's fate now, unless Washington manages to conduct a coup in Russia, like they did in Ukraine, and install a new drunkard at the helm.



Everyone does Nemo Wink

I don't. At all. But yes, most drink within reasonable limits that don't affect their ability to think clearly, especially in important matters.

Besides, in this picture Putin drinks beer (looks like a visit to a beer factory or something?) - so definitely not vodka-driven politics. It is also questionable that he drinks. My grandfather had many different strategies for avoided drinking in companies, while appearing to be drinking. Wink
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
September 19, 2014, 05:51:41 AM

Vodka driven politics leads to destruction.


You know, I wholeheartedly agree with you there. Yeltsin, and the almost-destruction of Russia by Washington puppeteers steering Yeltsin, is a prime example.

It's good to know that the current political leaders of Russia do not drink alcohol. So you shouldn't be too agitated for Russia's fate now, unless Washington manages to conduct a coup in Russia, like they did in Ukraine, and install a new drunkard at the helm.



Everyone does Nemo Wink
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
September 19, 2014, 05:30:00 AM

Vodka driven politics leads to destruction.


You know, I wholeheartedly agree with you there. Yeltsin, and the almost-destruction of Russia by Washington puppeteers steering Yeltsin, is a prime example.

It's good to know that the current political leaders of Russia do not drink alcohol. So you shouldn't be too agitated for Russia's fate now, unless Washington manages to conduct a coup in Russia, like they did in Ukraine, and install a new drunkard at the helm.
Jump to: