Topic: Donetsk, Kharkov, Lugansk - way to Russia. - page 85. (Read 734725 times)

Nemo, it´s certainly very convenient. Cui Bono?

January 5th, Hollande talks for lifting the sanctions at once, 48 hours later this attack.

And wasn´t he also talking about "not attacking Lybia alone". What was that about? Didn´t NATO already bomb the hell out of the place and kill and maim thousands to secure freedom and democracy?

But perhaps the oil isn´t so secure after all.

The shelling of an intercity passenger bus by Russian terrorists near the town of Volnovakha in the Donetsk Oblast "cannot be considered anything other than an act of terrorism," said Konstantyn Yeliseyev, Ukraine's representative to the European Union. As a result of the shelling, 11 passengers died and 13 were injured.

http://euromaidanpress.com/2015/01/13/ukraine-calls-for-firm-eu-response-to-the-volnovakha-bus-shelling/

...

Honest Europeans don’t want war and animosity. It’s natural for people to want to live in peace and cooperation. As Europe again starts doubting the wisdom of sanctions and of alienating Russia, THE NEW REMINDER is necessary. Enter #CharlieHebdo massacre and other French false flags.

It is clear to me that #Poroshenko’s real goal in Paris was to meet with Hollande and Merkel in order to obtain EU’s green light for the massive new attack on Donbass, to begin around mid-January. As of the beginning of January 2015, based on the mood of their people, it appeared that EU leaders wouldn’t easily acquiesce to this new attack, nor would the EU people close their eyes to it. That mood was changed by the French false flags. The French false flag game changer was especially necessary in order to convince Hollande, who was wavering the most based on the feelings of his electorate.

...

Those readers who wrote to me that diplomacy is dead, think again. If not for Putin and Lavrov’s diplomacy last year, the world may have been tipped into the hot war already. Think of diplomacy as a way of resolving any crisis with much less blood and much cheaper than without it.

The worst case scenario will be avoided yet again. However, the festering wound that is Ukraine will remain until the people there are awakened sufficiently and until they take their power back. Unfortunately, this won’t happen for another year or two – at different times in each part of Ukraine. See Predictions for more.

The uprising leading to change has to mature internally. There is no other way. The people have started rising in key cities, such as Odessa, Zaporozhie, and especially, Kharkov. The Kharkov underground has made an announcement that they would be beginning an active stage this year, but that they also want to avoid the bloodshed and mistakes of Donbass. The new mass mobilization and plans to squash Donbass are undoubtedly related to this announcement and the most recent Odessa explosions.

Twitter hashtag #JeSuisDonbass

https://twitter.com/hashtag/JeSuisDonbass?src=hash

Twelve people were killed and 17 wounded when a rocket exploded close to a bus near the city of Volnovakha on January 13

I actually think it's time to resurrect the old name of UKraine- "Little  Russia"- in order to bring back some class.

Little Russia or "Littlerus" will be far more elegant, the admiration of the world for Russia in fighting the bankrupt WEstern clowns will rub off if bankrupt Ukraine uses the word "rus" , or for more classier effect- use the whole world "Russia" itself.

Suggestions as new names of Ukraine:
LittleRus or Little Russia
PoorRus
Bankruptrus
Bwahaharus
I like the last one best  

naw to American and weak

Yeah Pagan, black is a little what shall I say, too ominous for a postman. Light blue or something along those lines would seem to be more appropriate.