Topic: Don't Judge a Book By Its Cover (Read 1192 times)
Really there are such people who estimate projects on its logo? I believe that there are more important points to pay attention to. More research needs to be done.
Now scammers go to various tricks in order to deceive us. Therefore, a superficial study is now not enough. If you want your money to be in order, you need to work hard and check everything very carefully.
The least trusted projects probably work harder to prove doubters wrong. This is about bringing real product that would back their token, and ensuring that trade in exchangers are active and efficient. Making investors smile at the turnout of their capital thereby attracting more investors. This make people believe in you and take more risk cos trust has been established.
You are right. Sero remains of the humble projects that shocked the crypto space because it started from a less popular exchange Qbtc until its announcement at gate exchange for IEO and I think Sero remains the best performing coin in IEO history or rather from gate exchange because I remember it doing x50. What I believe sold Sero is its unique privacy blockchain and Tokenomics which had very little supply in circulation as at then
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
Of course, you are right in this that you do not need to judge a project by its cover, but you can say so, but what prevents a good project from making a good cover? Saving money or something else? Everyone has the right to doubt, even if the cover is beautiful and the opportunities are good, all this may not be enough to achieve success. Nevertheless, a complex of all characteristics plays a role here, and one should not forget that the final result should be considered the moment when the project has fulfilled all the conditions according to its roadmap. If something in the process changes in favor of the participants, then this is the first hint of deception.
As a friend, you will definitely give good suggestions and explanations for your friends, but we also cannot blame others who do not agree with us, especially in an investment, of course others have their thoughts to determine which investment projects that they will indeed follow.
Especially now there are many investments that commit fraud against investors and of course this makes other people will be very careful and not easily believe the opinions of others.
Especially now there are many investments that commit fraud against investors and of course this makes other people will be very careful and not easily believe the opinions of others.
The name and the logo of the project can tell a lot about it, but these are definitely the most important things when you choose the project for your investment. It is better to start discovering the project with its Whitepaper.
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
I did not think that the logo is important to someone))).Very cool projects and do not experience about it.The main thing that the product was necessary and solving real problems. How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
~snip image~
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
~snip image~
Crypto is full of mystery! sometimes what looks professional is scammer, but this is the opposite.~snip image~
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
~snip image~
Dont know if youre updated still op or not but this sero coin is going zero to the floor. 
~snip image~
If viewed from the history chart, it looks like this is pump n dump coin, of course the price is manipulation so there is no reason to buy this coin ~snip image~
I had a big hope on this project that if I hold this coin, I will make good profit, but as usual, SERO is another shit altcoin now. All of their high trading volume and other things seem fake now! Though it's price still higher than the IEO price, but investors are not totally happy with this coin. I sold all of my holding SERO at a huge loss!
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
I discovered Sero months back because of some of its unique properties such as zero proof technology and its ability to become the first privacy project with smart contract services and thus allows dapps to be built thereon. But now that you highlighted Sero price as one of its key points, I wonder what those who bought at $0.25 after seeing your post would do because its is currently trading at $0.085
Dont know if youre updated still op or not but this sero coin is going zero to the floor.
It shows that not every coin success at the end because that shows it only at the beginning of the release of token but then it would dump like some of the people. Project not based on the logo because it is how the ICO succeed and how it continued to work to introduce for other in order to gain a demand.
Your comments are very good. But you can't blame them for just looking at the looks because the scam technology is so sophisticated, after the glimpse, it's probably an empty company, and if it's not safe, it's best to stay away. It is best to choose large, reputable platforms to save time.
Dont know if youre updated still op or not but this sero coin is going zero to the floor.
Of course, I'm not like those people who choose a project by its logo, glamour and other outside appearance, it's true when a project has launched then those appearances might carry importance to attract people but it's not mandatory to make select by this segment, so definitely, it might be a wrong process if you choose by the outside, but you can't blame someone who judges a project through the whitepaper, roadmap and so on, because you don't even have any document to judge a project without getting involved here, so a regulation process is very essential to this system in order to make a good choice.
Sero is a garbage coin and it has nothing to do with its logo, believe me.
The coin adds absolutely nothing in terms of innovation and is just another shit coin put out by someone wanting to make money for *themselves* only. Since it takes very little thought to copy another coin's code and essentially rebrand it, the barrier to entry into the crypto market is as low as it could possibly get. And obviously the market isn't being fooled by this, because I can barely find price or any other info on Sero. It's just a bad coin and this thread is an obvious attempt to pump it.
Nobody is fooled. Doesn't matter what the logo looks like and crypto investors aren't that stupid, op.
The coin adds absolutely nothing in terms of innovation and is just another shit coin put out by someone wanting to make money for *themselves* only. Since it takes very little thought to copy another coin's code and essentially rebrand it, the barrier to entry into the crypto market is as low as it could possibly get. And obviously the market isn't being fooled by this, because I can barely find price or any other info on Sero. It's just a bad coin and this thread is an obvious attempt to pump it.
Nobody is fooled. Doesn't matter what the logo looks like and crypto investors aren't that stupid, op.
Ofcourse you cannot judge a coin simply because you don't like the design of it's logo, the Sero which you used as an example might not have the best graphics designer in it's team but they already have a fully functional blockchain infrastructure before the launch of their IEO in gate Exchange, in the Cryptocurrency space, it's not about how much noise you make, it's about how much code has been written by you, the Crypto space has passed that stage where projects grow only by hype alone.
Exactly. Its very difficult to judge a project which hasn't been looked into because you might judge it wrongly and that will be unfair so its wise to research about a particular project especially new projects before you conclude on anything.
Definitely you shouldn't just look at the surface or some part of a coin to determine the success potential of the coin. All good crypto coins have a unique trait that makes them different from shitcoins. They have specific purpose they participate in the crypto ecosystem. To avoid shitcoins, you should make sure that the coin you want to invest in has a specific purpose and its unique in a way relevant to the crypto market.
It won't be easy judging anything without proper research whether the project have a good addition to this industry. If the coin is just another sweety promises where it can bring huge profits without any unique usable purpose it will just turned into trash and will die naturally.You need to be specific when investing or supporting project. Knowing and understanding the purpose leads you to have good insight with the project.
Definitely you shouldn't just look at the surface or some part of a coin to determine the success potential of the coin. All good crypto coins have a unique trait that makes them different from shitcoins. They have specific purpose they participate in the crypto ecosystem. To avoid shitcoins, you should make sure that the coin you want to invest in has a specific purpose and its unique in a way relevant to the crypto market.
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
We all have our own preferences but nothing proves more than the success of the project we have invested in. I seldom judge on aesthetics but it still a factor for publicity and demand. Yet this project made it to its successful days (I hope there is more to come). Functionality and the overall quality might be the main factors why this project have been successful. Kudos to the dev team and to those investors that believe in the project.
Jump to: