Topic: Don't Judge a Book By Its Cover - page 6. (Read 1196 times)
Yes it is common for each and every book because each and every book looks like different in its qualities while seeing the page but once we read it completely we have different mindset about the book this is the fact that very beautiful needs to understand a person fully and judge them.
To be honest, I have been a victim of this severally as well, I tend to fall in love with a project if I like it's logo, additionally, I am also biased when it comes to the team and when I saw that the Sero team were Indians, I kinda lost interest because I have fallen a victim of too many Indian scams in the past, turned out that I was wrong this time.
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
-snip-
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
-snip-
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
-snip-
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
-snip-
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
first i will say congrats for all Sero believers
because as the early investors or people who believe with this Sero from the beginning already made a huge profit now
imagine from $0,01 to - $0,33
maybe people should learn from this case to find out the most potential ICO project in crypto world, when a lot of people said if IEO was better than ICO
Well, I would not blame them, if I were them I would do the same too, that is the shit that scammer has turned everyone to, in fact I suspect to the extent of using their name to judge them, because I believe if any project has an intelligent team, then they should also be able to come up with a constructive name that sounds like a company name, there are so many project that I have participated in their campaign, and if you look at the majority of them, they have very funny shit name.
You may have done your research on this and be convinced based on your own level of your understanding, but you don’t know the intention of the developers themselves, I have seen so many projects start from 0.01 to 0.08 and then dump till they are now shitcoins in the market.
You may have done your research on this and be convinced based on your own level of your understanding, but you don’t know the intention of the developers themselves, I have seen so many projects start from 0.01 to 0.08 and then dump till they are now shitcoins in the market.
It is a typical behaviour when you hear about new privacy coin, yet another monero. But do you think SERO has more potential than Monero, Beam or Grin?
i don't think this coin will beat monero as the best privacy coins my friend
but, if we comparing with beam and grin, maybe the potential from Sero is same with both
And the name of an altcoins should always have an impact to the crypto community. We can't deny that majority of investors are misjudging the coin based on it's name.
Judging a name or a logo of an altcoin is like judging a restaurant's signage without giving it a try or taste. The most important to consider is the project itself, it the project seems to be working well and had sincere goal, then it should not be neglected regardless of it's appearance/logo and name. What we should look for always is the potential of the altcoin, not the physical design of logo or whatsoever.
Judging a name or a logo of an altcoin is like judging a restaurant's signage without giving it a try or taste. The most important to consider is the project itself, it the project seems to be working well and had sincere goal, then it should not be neglected regardless of it's appearance/logo and name. What we should look for always is the potential of the altcoin, not the physical design of logo or whatsoever.
judging a book by its cover is the greatest mistake one can ever make. Here is the crypto world and everything is possible and surprisingly. The projects whitepaper, how scam-like it looks, what matters most is your vivid research about the project, the team behind it and how they respond to their social media handles.
It is a typical behaviour when you hear about new privacy coin, yet another monero. But do you think SERO has more potential than Monero, Beam or Grin?
There are always people like that they want the project come in planes before they value it worth. There are so many projects which has eluded guys simply because they downplayed it thinking it will not fetch them anything only for them to laugh at the wrong side of their teeth.
Honestly, am marveled at how fast this project has grown from ICO. Its one project I hesitated at joining the bounty when price was very low just because I judged the project wrongly as you rightly stated. The team are really doing a good job and I hope they continue on this for a long time. Most project have the opportunity to do well but they lack good team base. Its good to research well on a project in order not to miss out on a good one cos of wrong judgements.
How do you think an investor only sees it from the outside. Do we want to invest that is seen first is a bright logo color? the logo form? This is truly out of the ordinary, we should see the project idea and whatnot. The right example might be SERO, they are good at developing projects. Previously people considered this project to be dead or not successful
This is a grave mistake that most crypto investors do and it's so wrong. Most people tend to go with projects that have gotten a huge hype in the space and also is trending all across the news. Forgetting that all these are marketing strategies and people are paid to do all of these. Do your own research before investing into any project.
This SERO is a very extraordinary project in my opinion, because it successfully carried out ICO and exceeded the ICO price in less than 5 months. Similar projects usually take a long time, especially when the market is not as good as it is today.
from the ICO price of $ 0.02 now to $ 0.27, it has increased by 1,250%, which is very extraordinary. this will be an attraction for investors entering the SERO. SERO TEAM is very good at marketing their projects to success as they are today.
from the ICO price of $ 0.02 now to $ 0.27, it has increased by 1,250%, which is very extraordinary. this will be an attraction for investors entering the SERO. SERO TEAM is very good at marketing their projects to success as they are today.
Impressive,congrats to all the investors that quickly grab the coin while still at 1cent and good luck to those that wants to invest now and I hope it will live up to its potential
I've guessed that this project does have very good potential, at that time I wanted to support it but when I saw there was no signature campaign I was only monitoring the progress of this project, I saw Sero did have a very good concept even though their covers were not very interesting
Yes their website interface, the logo looks simple. But if you look at their technology, team members event pictures, several meetup events, partners then you will realize how good the project is! There was no signature campaign but Peopler got thousands of USD by doing SERO social campaign.
you can't blame them mate because you know ppl nowadays always make an issue even without strong of evidence especially if the situation of the coin is getting worse. Which they're always making comparison and spreading awareness not to become involve on the project. Without knowing it has a genuine team behind. And in long run it will survive than their coin.
You can't judge projects by how they look,what matters is what they are here to fix in crypto space,i introduced a good privacy altcoin to my friends weeks ago and they neglect it because of its look,the name of the project is sero
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
How can someone judge a project because of its white&black inky look?the fact is sero is just more than its logo looks and its already trading at a very good price 0.33$ i think,while its ICO price was 0.01cent.
My advice to people like my friends is to always put aside how a project looks,either scam looking or not please take your time to investigate before you decide if its good or not.Some projects are more than how they look,remember that not all shinny things are good either,learn to do research on projects not how they look.
I had a very bitter experience, I judged a project based on its name and it turns out to be the most paid project of the month, some that did it got as much as 0.19btc and it was just for 2weeks. Well I believe your friends have learnt their lesson like me and they will start researching wisely before they discard a project
I dont know if there is anyone having same thought as mine,i just love gate.io and most IEO funds are easily successful on the exchange because of how experienced the gate.io teams are
It's good to do deep research on a project before you decide to invest or not, sometimes you might be wrong too. The fact that SERO price increased doesn't make it outstanding, I prefer looking at the products on ground thoroughly and the project development. Well, for sero, I rate it average since it has fair project development.
I think the SERO price increase is simple because it has a low IEO cap of only $ 250k, while the Gate floor has a huge amount of investors.
I agree. The cover is usually judged by fools or children. Because I think that everything needs to be investigated in order to give a real result or judge a project.
you wouldn't believe how much adults could spend for a drawing of an apple
good design is very important, sometimes a new project still don't have the budget, but I hope they will rebrand.
Jump to: