Topic: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) - page 23. (Read 17611 times)

[ LIST] Banned users

No, he just distrusts users who leave obvious bullshit trust ratings.  Hence why he has distrusted you, and trusts me. 

Hi LoyceV,

the thread title says "...(or are banned)" I can't recall seeing a list of banned users for a while, - is there such a list?

---

---

I've just had a look at that old chestnut Peloso, they "trust" most of the people who distrust them (does that mean Peloso is admitting they can't be trusted?)? ??

It must be the effects of extended lockdown...

Yes, you do keep having brain-farts ... don't you... 

---

---

Do I know you?

Hello hilarioisandco, if I may add, mdayonliner, although he is on the "correct" path, he still has a lot to do to catch up with the lunatic Timelord. Let's just remember that Tinelord gave me a neutral feedback which sounded as negative, only for pointing out one of his (infinite) scandals to xtraelv's topic which was created for known scandals (more details at my Trust section).

Mdayonliner is on a "good" path, but he still has to work his way until reaching the imbecility level shown by Timelord. This guy (Timelord) is above and beyond any level of imbecility known so far.

So minerjones now leaves negative feedback for not leaving a source and yet fails to provide a source on both occasions?  Ok then.


You're still butthurt? Thought you would have moved on by now. And don't be a hypocrite like timelord:



MinerJones is attempting to extort staff to get his own way with negative feedback. You think that's trustworthy behaviour and something people should just ignore?

You have a new tag again.

i not think
you realy scammer, you know it, im know it and all people know it

I believe Theymos should moderate obvious bullshit trust on the key DT members.  Looking at my list, you would think I am a scammer.   How many people will take the time to investigate that it's all revenge for exposing scams?

Minerjones was butthurt at something I didn't do (despite the fact that it wasn't even within my power to do this thing), so he left me a negative rating, since he has removed it, I'm deleting mine, too, and am going to assume it was just a brainfart. There weren't any references because I didn't feel like screenshotting private conversations.

Would it be too much to ask for you to refrain from derailing threads with your personal disputes now that you're back as a reinvented honest forum user? This has absolutely nothing to do with you. This is a thread about DT1/DT2 members.

Not surprise to see the ironic behaviour coming from you.
Yes minerjones should not use the feedback this way but what have you done?


You left a feedback because you consider him to abuse the feedback system. This is not much better than what minerjones has done in fact this is the worse practice and this is not first time I've noticed too.

If you think minerjones should be distrusted for the feedback he left on you then you should be distrusted too for the similar reason in fact yours one is more blatant, more abusive and shameful. This feedback shows that you have zero basic about the feedback system currently the forum has. You do not leave a feedback for a wrong feedback but distrust a user if you think he gone too far.


This is not any better too but I did not follow malevolent as much as I did for you.

Now I would not surprise if you spend your days to find some connections with some other account or accounts to humiliate minerjones. You will closely observe how he spend his merits and once you will find him to send a merit to that account you are suspecting to be his alt, you will create a topic with some strawman arguments, reference like (minerjones calls me a gay, and this user also calls me a gay; minerjones is active in x board, and this user is active in the same board; minerjones lives in this country and this user lives in this country too; and so many made up connections that only your creative imagination can produce such things). Sadly others will find every BS that will come from you are convincing and they will start making fun of minerjones. It will not be as easy as it was on me but eventually maybe you will find a way to get people behind you. This is how you done your things to find sensation.

Take it or leave it, stop finding problems in others while you are no good than them.

Wouldn't matter. They'd just leave a link to anything.


How is that trust abuse? It's funny how you don't seem to mind abusing it in a dishonest way in the exact same fashion. You're clearly biased and are doing it in an attempt to smear people you don't like because it's funny how you haven't left theymos negative for the exact same thing including his "transphobic" April's fool joke (joke being the keyword there but obviously satire goes over idiots' heads). MinerJones should be distrusted by everyone right now because he's clearly trying to use the trust system to extort staff to get his own way. Is that what the system is for? No. If someone wants to get staff attention then create a thread in Meta like most people do. Is this going to become common practice to leave a negative feedback everytime something goes unanswerd or unhandled?



Exactly. TimeLord's a hypocritical idiot. It's seemingly perfectly fine for him to do the exact same thing, but it's only trust abuse when someone he dislikes does it. MinerJones has just admitted he is using the system in an attempt to be heard and that certainly makes him untrustworthy in my opinion.

While minerjones did not handle the feedback very well but his reason of getting attention make sense however I would say with him the same thing that it is sad if one has to seek attention this way.

On the other hand, sending two retaliatory feedback from two moderators is not setting up a good example for new users or those who are not well aware of how to use trust feedback system.

Now if someone sends a retaliatory feedback and if the community raise concern about it then that guy will just simply say that your moderators can send retaliatory feedback then why are you questioning me (the guy who will send the retaliatory feedback).

I think we all need to have more careful before sending a feedback especially a negative one.

I wouldn't call that Trust abuse.
From Trust settings:
As long as Trust isn't moderated, that will only lead to fake reference links.

---

---

Minerjones removed the 4 red tags.

I understand your frustration.  I've been to busy to frequent the collectables section the last few months, but after suchmoon's post I went to have a look-see.  That is quite an annoying troll, and very likely a ban-evader. 

However, your use of negative reviews does give the appearance that you're weaponizing the trust system to get what you want.  People are bound to take that angrily, and some will retaliate.  I hope the ramifications are temporary and cooler heads prevail.

Theymos should make reference links mandatory for negative trust.

...and this just in ...

A second DT trust abuse has just occurred against minerjones:

---

---

(Not to mention their retaliatory trust feedback abuse against minerjones:

malevolent, Cyrus, and hilariousandco are all listed as moderators on the Collectibles board. Given the wording of the ratings this must have something to do with mods not acting on reports. Perhaps related to Rainbowsky's trollfuckery. I guess that's one way to get admin's attention...