You're not in DT1 this month, why not add them maybe in the next election you will be in DT1 so it will have an effect. [...]
What's the point of this? You could just as well say that next month OgNasty will not be on the DT1 list, so silverfuture's feedback will not be anything.Edited: Maybe let's get back to talking about this? [quote ] ... since this problem seems to me more urgent than self-scratching.
Not that it bothers me much, but I want to raise a rhetorical question about the monthly DT elections .. I see a tendency in mutual inclusion and exclusion on the basis of solidarity or revenge. So, users who, for one reason or another, were excluded from DT show solidarity, thereby pushing each other up the stairs, (0, +1).
There are more and more such users, and this becomes a problem, since out of a sense of revenge they exclude those who used the tilde against them. While it may seem like the right move for the average user to exclude people who abuse the trust system, this does not mean that the user will do so, since this step will lead to massive mutual exclusions (we can see how this looks like in mindrust's example).
I just want to say that the problem is that due to the lack of a counterweight, the most common user on DT1 will think twice about using the tilde or not. It seems to me that the simplest and most reasonable solution may be the coordinated actions of 3-5 volunteers that will maintain the balance according to the principle: until another DT1 member makes an exception/inclusion, or the user personally requests an exception from the DT1 network. Although, it all depends on the point of view, since I am sure that from a different angle it may also seem like interference (in the sense that, by and large, such actions will not differ in any way from those discussed)
There are more and more such users, and this becomes a problem, since out of a sense of revenge they exclude those who used the tilde against them. While it may seem like the right move for the average user to exclude people who abuse the trust system, this does not mean that the user will do so, since this step will lead to massive mutual exclusions (we can see how this looks like in mindrust's example).
Quote
I just want to say that the problem is that due to the lack of a counterweight, the most common user on DT1 will think twice about using the tilde or not. It seems to me that the simplest and most reasonable solution may be the coordinated actions of 3-5 volunteers that will maintain the balance according to the principle: until another DT1 member makes an exception/inclusion, or the user personally requests an exception from the DT1 network. Although, it all depends on the point of view, since I am sure that from a different angle it may also seem like interference (in the sense that, by and large, such actions will not differ in any way from those discussed)
