So many good people got throw out of DT1 to welcome so many bad people in DT2. Saddening.
Thanks for the update!Who of them do you mean when say bad people?
what criteria do you define a person bad or not bad?
Topic: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned) - page 30. (Read 17754 times)
So many good people got throw out of DT1 to welcome so many bad people in DT2. Saddening.
Thanks for the update!Who of them do you mean when say bad people?
what criteria do you define a person bad or not bad?
Are any of these users merit sources?
Quote
It's hard to interpret what action if anything you'd like users to take unless you just want to pass this information on for reference purposes only.
It's up to the reader what to do with this information, I just try to highlight possible problems. 
Are any of these users merit sources? Items such as ancient positive feedback swapping for trinkets/a dollar's worth of crypto, or more recently merit circle jerks. Other factors would be grudges swapping negatives exclusively with another user (get a room Vod/Og)
It's hard to interpret what action if anything you'd like users to take unless you just want to pass this information on for reference purposes only.
It's hard to interpret what action if anything you'd like users to take unless you just want to pass this information on for reference purposes only.
Update!
DT1 was updated last night, so there may be even more changes than usual this week.
1. 15728: TECSHARE (Trust: +47 / =7 / -1) (DT1! (2) 799 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 18321: OgNasty (Trust: +84 / =5 / -4) (DT1! (12) 815 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (11) 176 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 313016: owlcatz (Trust: +46 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 307 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 982288: Vispilio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -3) (DT1! (0) 884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +33 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (7) 658 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =3 / -4) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 31931: Anduck (Trust: +20 / =2 / -1) (68 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 38894: SaltySpitoon (Trust: +21 / =1 / -1) (1012 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 40976: DeaDTerra (Trust: +3 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 54113: BCB (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +24 / =0 / -1) (53 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 81995: peloso (Trust: +3 / =3 / -2) (149 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 98986: TMAN (Trust: +28 / =1 / -2) (1302 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 138940: minifrij (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (214 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 316604: CryptoImperator (Trust: +30 / =1 / -4) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 370611: bill gator (Trust: +17 / =3 / -6) (542 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +32 / =2 / -1) (840 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +10 / =2 / -1) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 585799:lega46141 Banned! (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. 795961: cryptoheadd (Trust: +18 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 958510: BtcMan2009 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (90 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 982157:tayfundeniz Banned! (Trust: neutral) (46 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. 1021758: hacker1001101001 (Trust: +3 / =3 / -2) (269 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 1831671:ugurum15 Banned! (Trust: neutral) (22 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
DT1 was updated last night, so there may be even more changes than usual this week.
1. 15728: TECSHARE (Trust: +47 / =7 / -1) (DT1! (2) 799 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. 18321: OgNasty (Trust: +84 / =5 / -4) (DT1! (12) 815 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (11) 176 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. 313016: owlcatz (Trust: +46 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (16) 307 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. 982288: Vispilio (Trust: +6 / =1 / -3) (DT1! (0) 884 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. 1668017: anonymousminer (Trust: +33 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (7) 658 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 30747: Vod (Trust: +28 / =3 / -4) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. 31931: Anduck (Trust: +20 / =2 / -1) (68 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. 38894: SaltySpitoon (Trust: +21 / =1 / -1) (1012 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. 40976: DeaDTerra (Trust: +3 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. 54113: BCB (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +24 / =0 / -1) (53 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. 81995: peloso (Trust: +3 / =3 / -2) (149 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. 98986: TMAN (Trust: +28 / =1 / -2) (1302 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. 138940: minifrij (Trust: +13 / =0 / -1) (214 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. 316604: CryptoImperator (Trust: +30 / =1 / -4) (203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. 370611: bill gator (Trust: +17 / =3 / -6) (542 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +32 / =2 / -1) (840 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +10 / =2 / -1) (34 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. 585799:
22. 795961: cryptoheadd (Trust: +18 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. 958510: BtcMan2009 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (90 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. 982157:
25. 1021758: hacker1001101001 (Trust: +3 / =3 / -2) (269 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. 1831671:
DT members who get banned should automatically be removed from DT1/2.
You have a point but theres possibility of not making the judgement because some alot of DT1/2 member support themselves while some have some unresolved issue going on which could lead to holding a grudge against each other. With that been said, for every problem theres always a solution cause theres always a better of doing things and if negative feedback or banned is enough to penalize a DT1/2 member that should be enough cause the member reputation is already downgraded.
Sorry, no update this week 
I had some problems scraping Trust scores, so I'm using the same data as last week.
Next Saturday, I should be able to update this again.
I had some problems scraping Trust scores, so I'm using the same data as last week.Next Saturday, I should be able to update this again.
Some of the members from a certain local language board have managed to get some of their clique in to DT1, they have played the system for far too long. They have their own motives which are mostly based around trying to get on to (what they deem to be lucrative) signature campaigns and now even posing as campaign mangers trying to get an income which they are connecting with DT1 because they feel it will boos their chances to impress prospective parties.
I was once told in a PM by a well respected member of this community that he did not want to openly make his case against a member here because of the politics involved. The DT system as it stands is open to abuse and there are too many users that rotate in and out that should be nowhere near DT.
I was once told in a PM by a well respected member of this community that he did not want to openly make his case against a member here because of the politics involved. The DT system as it stands is open to abuse and there are too many users that rotate in and out that should be nowhere near DT.
Thanks Loyce, informative as always.
I made some overdue changes to my trust list based on these findings -- not necessarily based on just somebody having negative trust, but a lot of things:
- do I agree with their ratings in large?
- do they even leave ratings?
- have they been active at all this year?
- who is in their inclusions list?
Not going to name names, but there's a significant amount of members both new and old that seem to be using the trust system to paid their scores or place on DT. I fully expect some reciprocal exclusions to take place shortly, but to be honest I don't blame people that do that, as I don't trust people that actively distrust my judgment either.
I think in many cases its a matter of education and experience -- as mentioned earlier in this thread a lot of people just don't understand how the trust system works.
I made some overdue changes to my trust list based on these findings -- not necessarily based on just somebody having negative trust, but a lot of things:
- do I agree with their ratings in large?
- do they even leave ratings?
- have they been active at all this year?
- who is in their inclusions list?
Not going to name names, but there's a significant amount of members both new and old that seem to be using the trust system to paid their scores or place on DT. I fully expect some reciprocal exclusions to take place shortly, but to be honest I don't blame people that do that, as I don't trust people that actively distrust my judgment either.
I think in many cases its a matter of education and experience -- as mentioned earlier in this thread a lot of people just don't understand how the trust system works.
I am sure you would never like Burying the hatchet and you don't have any other motive than attacking weak here. You are as low as kicking an apology on face.
And who are those weak people?Stop shitposting you ICO bump account, there are some negative ratings which shouldn't be in trust feedback. You have topic, read it and find them.
I can't defend myself from your biased and selective ratings as you think that everyone should be perfect here and could never change in his deeds although I have not attempted to scam anyone. You even landed me up until getting your buddies interested in my personal info and attempting to threaten me with doxxing. I politely explained my situation to you in PM and even said about it not being repeated by me once I got aware year's back. Yet you still thinking of me as an ICO bump account is an big flaw in your judgement and hence my interpretation of you not really meaning to bury the hatchets here.
you even forget how you attaked me, you and marlboroza
now you say im attaked you
You had loan scammers in your trust list!now you say im attaked you
when? show me
its reason for attack ?
you even forget how you attaked me, you and marlboroza
now you say im attaked you
You had loan scammer in your trust list!now you say im attaked you
when? show me
its reason for attack ?
Use search button. its reason for attack ?
That's my opinion on your flip-flops, not something I need to prove to you. Anyone else can make their own conclusions if they want.
your opinion? your opinion is very perverse
you can keep it in yourselfyear ago my trust turned to red by stupid morons and it was for opinion
you SUPPORTED them ( now you not supported ) but that time you did
you even forget how you attaked me, you and marlboroza
now you say im attaked you
Users are entitled to their opinions aren't they? I mean within reason.
This is the problem. Example: College dropouts that think they are smarter than the world supermajority consensus of scientists on a certain matter, thus the defence boils down to "BUT I AM ENTITLED TO MY OPINION". The proper answer would be not to ignore, and not to accept their entitlement but to call them out for what they are: Ignorant and uneducated baboons. We found ourselves in a crisis, and it is in such crises that fake news and false opinions must not be accepted for the sake of everyone else!I'm not sure why everyone is attacking each other these days.
Discussions on issues are also being avoided, privately and publicly (whilst publicly stating that opinions can be changed or that consensus matters on some of these issues). It is a sad state of affairs. ...
Ah yes... and not forgetting marlboroza who also knows how to kick someone when they are down and keeps clicking quote/reply...
Quote
you become paid whore and ignorant prick because of few dollars.
Says the guy getting paid $5-$6 per post from his own Signature Campaign.
Check your facts first from now on.
I am sure you would never like Burying the hatchet and you don't have any other motive than attacking weak here. You are as low as kicking an apology on face.
And who are those weak people?Stop shitposting you ICO bump account, there are some negative ratings which shouldn't be in trust feedback. You have topic, read it and find them.
suchmoon shows a complete lack of self restraint by responding to every post that mentions their name. One of the growing list of reasons I now distrust this hot head.
@The Pharmacist - is there any chance we can start a pm conversation about any concerns you may have about my DT trust list or trust feed back list please?
When someone mentions your name, why wouldn't it be acceptable to respond?@The Pharmacist - is there any chance we can start a pm conversation about any concerns you may have about my DT trust list or trust feed back list please?
I'm not sure why everyone is attacking each other these days. If you guy's don't like each other then click ignore and move on. Users are entitled to their opinions aren't they? I mean within reason.
NO
its just in your mind but it not true
your knowledge is wrong
its just in your mind but it not true
your knowledge is wrong
Oh well. Then I guess I'll never know what it is that you were trying to say.
Because even under the most generous interpretation of your actions you're utterly confused about the trust system and unstable in your judgement.
you wrong or show proofs
That's my opinion on your flip-flops, not something I need to prove to you. Anyone else can make their own conclusions if they want.
suchmoon shows a complete lack of self restraint by responding to every post that mentions their name. One of the growing list of reasons I now distrust this hot head.
What would be the acceptable ratio? Is responding to every other post ok? If I respond to a post that doesn't mention my name, does that make my head hotter or colder? On a scale of 1 to 10, how hot am I right now? I have so many other questions but I fear I'm wearing out my welcome in this thread already.
@LoyceV thanks for this topic, it cleared certain things. I would actually like to call "certain members" to bury hatchet if they are willing to.
I am sure you would never like Burying the hatchet and you don't have any other motive than attacking weak here. You are as low as kicking an apology on face.
...
Ah yes... and not forgetting marlboroza who also knows how to kick someone when they are down and keeps clicking quote/reply...
Definitely on my distrust list the pair of them.
Quote
you become paid whore and ignorant prick because of few dollars.
Says the guy getting paid $5-$6 per post from his own Signature Campaign.
Check your facts first from now on.
Next.
suchmoon shows a complete lack of self restraint by responding to every post that mentions their name. One of the growing list of reasons I now distrust this hot head.
I think every single user here is allowed to respond to whatever they wish to respond, may I suggest you to stop shitposting? Has your reputation fallen so deep in last few weeks so you keep ignoring important things because someone payed you few bucks for signature spam?https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1021758
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ree-hacker1001101001-ico-bump-account-5213922
Jesus Timelord, you become payed whore and ignorant prick because of few dollars.
Fucking disgrace. This is your "ultimate alt account scam fighter". Ignorant prick who will ignore everything because of money and shit on others because they got signature payment. It is just disgusting.
@LoyceV thanks for this topic, it cleared certain things. I would actually like to call "certain members" to bury hatchet if they are willing to.
suchmoon shows a complete lack of self restraint by responding to every post that mentions their name. One of the growing list of reasons I now distrust this hot head.
@The Pharmacist - is there any chance we can start a pm conversation about any concerns you may have about my DT trust list or trust feed back list please?
@The Pharmacist - is there any chance we can start a pm conversation about any concerns you may have about my DT trust list or trust feed back list please?
Jump to: