Author

Topic: ✅ DuckDice.io 🎲 Rakeback 🎲 Races 🎲 Faucet 🎲 Deposit Bonus 🎲 Jackpot 🎲 - page 129. (Read 119732 times)

full member
Activity: 508
Merit: 101
EXMR
Website is run by a  scammer .Dont waste your money with them
Do You Know what your talking about.,Duckdice.Io scams nobody,.If you didnt play in their site then shut up.,You dont know how good duckdice is,.And FYI That thing happens because of stupid mistake done by that stupid player.,Every player there is treated fairlly,may it small or big players.,Why would u blame the site.,its not their fault not to read pop up messages upon bonus cancellation.,And besides this bonus is optional and the site never force anyone to claim it.,Why did he claim it if he know he is a weak gambler and never had the skills to unlock it and then make scandalous accusation out of his stupid mistake..We never had a problem like this before and this one is a weak accusation which is supported by people like you who wanted to bring the site down because you know that duckdice.io will become the number one gambling site sooner.,
full member
Activity: 274
Merit: 100
gial1949:

please drop your racist posts, even though we are not from India you should be very much aware that India is a huge country and have lots of great specialists and this post of yours may sounds offensive to other participants of this thread.

Regarding the bonuses, current bonus campaign will be over soon, no Bonuses - no accusations. And as for now, for those who don't have an intention to clear the bonus please, don't claim it!

DuckDice will run a new bonus campaign in the next months with all new conditions and rules, we will announce all the details here.

Also, complete DuckDice redesign will be released next month alongside new Bonuses.

And just to remind, DuckDice never scammed anyone and we have zero history of manipulations or withdrawal issues.


i have edited my post you have to refund user if you really want a good feedback
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 505
gial1949:

please drop your racist posts, even though we are not from India you should be very much aware that India is a huge country and have lots of great specialists and this post of yours may sounds offensive to other participants of this thread.

Regarding the bonuses, current bonus campaign will be over soon, no Bonuses - no accusations. And as for now, for those who don't have an intention to clear the bonus please, don't claim it!

DuckDice will run a new bonus campaign in the next months with all new conditions and rules, we will announce all the details here.

Also, complete DuckDice redesign will be released next month alongside new Bonuses.

And just to remind, DuckDice never scammed anyone and we have zero history of manipulations or withdrawal issues.


Sad to see this site's reputation get destroyed by their one mistake.
Probably duckdice should refund the customer so there won't be any more issues with their bonuses.
This is what I hate about bonuses, the terms and conditions are all too complicated to understand.
Though I think it has always been that way since it was introduced.
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253
Without any proofs, your words are useless.
I've only seen innovations from DuckDice on one very boring market.
Read a few pages back, check the scam accusation or their feedback.

Scam accusations are regarding deposit bonus, the rules may be harsh but the issue is with the user who didn't read a warning messages and canceled his bonus.
How can you actually call it scam, we have our Bonuses already for about 9 months and we have MANY users winning big with our bonus and we always paying out. It's almost a loan you just need to follow the rules and be a bit attentive, how can you even call it a scam? Bonuses are not a core feature, if you don't want to take them, you don't have to. And we have a whole mod team who is great in unlocking bonuses, they would be more than happy to explain in details how it works and even give some hints.
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253
gial1949:

please drop your racist posts, even though we are not from India you should be very much aware that India is a huge country and have lots of great specialists and this post of yours may sounds offensive to other participants of this thread.

Regarding the bonuses, current bonus campaign will be over soon, no Bonuses - no accusations. And as for now, for those who don't have an intention to clear the bonus please, don't claim it!

DuckDice will run a new bonus campaign in the next months with all new conditions and rules, we will announce all the details here.

Also, complete DuckDice redesign will be released next month alongside new Bonuses.

And just to remind, DuckDice never scammed anyone and we have zero history of manipulations or withdrawal issues.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Without any proofs, your words are useless.
I've only seen innovations from DuckDice on one very boring market.
Read a few pages back, check the scam accusation or their feedback.
full member
Activity: 324
Merit: 100
what has been your highest win streak so far?
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1004
FRX: Ferocious Alpha
Website is run by a Indian scammer .Dont waste your money with them

Without any proofs, your words are useless.

I've only seen innovations from DuckDice on one very boring market.
full member
Activity: 274
Merit: 100
Website is run by a  scammer .Dont waste your money with them
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 507
You offer to cancel the bonus, but then in reality you cancel the whole balance inclusive deposit and winnings and this is the criminal offense of false representation!

2 Fraud by false representation

(1) A person is in breach of this section if he—

(a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and

(b) intends, by making the representation—

(i) to make a gain for himself or another, or

(ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.

(2) A representation is false if—

(a) it is untrue or misleading, and

(b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.

(3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—

(a) the person making the representation, or

(b) any other person.

(4) A representation may be express or implied.

(5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
A bonus with dice is different then a different then other casino games. You have to prevent that users can make a loop. As said before, I don't know if this is the best way but this is how it works now. If an user don't read all the pop-ups on cancelling, it isn't the site who is scamming.
I disagree. You clearly scammed them.
Displaying a notice and making the user agree to this doesn't make it right. Once they accepted the bonus, there was no other way.
The cancel feature is a joke and I'm surprised this didn't cause issues earlier.
Reason it however you like, the way things are right now is wrong.
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
A bonus with dice is different then a different then other casino games.

How? In dice bonus, does it gives the right to site owners to take away the deposit of user just because they think user can make a loop?

You have to prevent that users can make a loop.

That can be achieved by ethical way as well. We already discussed it in scam accusation thread that taking the deposit is unethical .

As said before, I don't know if this is the best way but this is how it works now. If an user don't read all the pop-ups on cancelling, it isn't the site who is scamming.

That seems likes dice should be avoided which doesn't knows what is fair and what is not.


-snip-
Don't punish the player for something a cheater may or may not do.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
A bonus with dice is different then a different then other casino games. You have to prevent that users can make a loop. As said before, I don't know if this is the best way but this is how it works now. If an user don't read all the pop-ups on cancelling, it isn't the site who is scamming.

Already talked about how your system is unfair. Tell me why this is not unfair. Even when you want to prevent cheating, I think this is a pretty unethical practice. Don't punish the player for something a cheater may or may not do.

they actually warn people asking about the 'bonus conditions' that these bonuses are hard to unlock but advance players can(see older pages of this thread), I know somebody who was able to unlock it not only once.

But the conditions weren't in the terms. And if my hypothesis that profit adds to the locked balance but losses don't subtract from it is correct, then you're in a catch-22 as soon as you raise it past your balance.

That makes it so that you are literally forced to gamble or forfeit your balance altogether.

Rules

Is that anywhere there? The answer is no.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 512
If they simply made the bonus conditions such that one wagered their own balance before the bonus, then all would be well and this situation would be over.
But I don't think the one who 'lost' his balance would agree without getting anything
But they didn't lose, they won.
The only mistake the user made was trying to cancel their bonus.
Now I understand taking away the bonus when it's canceled, I also understand taking away profit made from the bonus.
But taking away the initial deposit as well? Now that's a bit harsh.

Indeed my point is same. Taking away initial deposit is just not fair at all. That's some shady thing they have done.

A bonus with dice is different then a different then other casino games. You have to prevent that users can make a loop. As said before, I don't know if this is the best way but this is how it works now. If an user don't read all the pop-ups on cancelling, it isn't the site who is scamming.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
If they simply made the bonus conditions such that one wagered their own balance before the bonus, then all would be well and this situation would be over.
But I don't think the one who 'lost' his balance would agree without getting anything
But they didn't lose, they won.
The only mistake the user made was trying to cancel their bonus.
Now I understand taking away the bonus when it's canceled, I also understand taking away profit made from the bonus.
But taking away the initial deposit as well? Now that's a bit harsh.

Indeed my point is same. Taking away initial deposit is just not fair at all. That's some shady thing they have done.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
If they simply made the bonus conditions such that one wagered their own balance before the bonus, then all would be well and this situation would be over.
But I don't think the one who 'lost' his balance would agree without getting anything
But they didn't lose, they won.
The only mistake the user made was trying to cancel their bonus.
Now I understand taking away the bonus when it's canceled, I also understand taking away profit made from the bonus.
But taking away the initial deposit as well? Now that's a bit harsh.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
they actually warn people asking about the 'bonus conditions' that these bonuses are hard to unlock but advance players can(see older pages of this thread), I know somebody who was able to unlock it not only once.

But the conditions weren't in the terms. And if my hypothesis that profit adds to the locked balance but losses don't subtract from it is correct, then you're in a catch-22 as soon as you raise it past your balance.

That makes it so that you are literally forced to gamble or forfeit your balance altogether.

Rules

Is that anywhere there? The answer is no.
sr. member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 373
<------
Nice bonus suggestions @actmyname,


If they simply made the bonus conditions such that one wagered their own balance before the bonus, then all would be well and this situation would be over.

But I don't think the one who 'lost' his balance would agree without getting anything

You see, in my opinion they don't force everyone to activate a bonus, and as far as I have observed from them, they actually warn people asking about the 'bonus conditions' that these bonuses are hard to unlock but advance players can(see older pages of this thread), I know somebody who was able to unlock it not only once.

P.S.

You may find my comment stupid, but I ''think before I click''. c,'')
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Duckdice have answered in the scam-accusation thread and have been open to ideas of the community. Nothing more to talk about a player who failed to read the pop-up message.

Indeed more to talk about.



DuckDice sent me a PM to which I had responded 2 days ago. They have yet to reply to my concerns.



Hey man,

you had many interesting insights on how bonuses should work, what is your site actually?

I don't have one.

and a few words regarding the scam topic, this one is a bit of a principle position because the guy tried to blackmail us from the first second and honestly speaking we don't believe that he missed a confirmation screen, so the only answer here is that he knew exact amount to subtracted but wanted to do it anyway and get a full refund later.
We don't want to make such precedent.

Supposing that the 'locked balance' only counts positive profit and not losses, if one, for example, loses and gains 1 BTC upon a 1 BTC deposit and bonus, then will the locked balance then show 2 BTC?

If this is what you are suggesting then I find it illogical. The locked balance should count both profit and loss. After all, at the end of it, you're not unlocking the 'locked balance' but rather the player balance at the time. There was already another idea mentioned, where one wagers their own balance first. That would be superior to this in terms of how bonuses work.

Consider the following:

A random player deposits 1 BTC and chooses the 120% bonus. The wagering requirement is 132 BTC.
The player chooses 0.25 BTC bets, winning 16 times and losing 20.

That is a gross profit of 4 BTC and a net loss of 1 BTC.

The player is left with 1.2 BTC and decides to bet 1 BTC to break even. They win.

Gross profit: 5 BTC  |  Net loss: 0 BTC

The player sees the locked balance at 5 BTC. They are now forced to play. That's unfair.

If he would just agree to make one more deposit (we actually never asked to deposit 5btc, anything above 0.01btc is eligible) we would've just add his amount as a bonus as a "consolation".

You couldn't have reverted anything to back when the bonus was active?



If they simply made the bonus conditions such that one wagered their own balance before the bonus, then all would be well and this situation would be over.
sr. member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 373
<------
The Last Man Standing #game is scheduled on 14:00 UTC, signup here!

GOOD LUCK!


Hey I just saw you got negative feedback. That isn't good at all for the site. Short out the matter asap(just a suggestion).

Duckdice have answered in the scam-accusation thread and have been open to ideas of the community. Nothing more to talk about a player who failed to read the pop-up message.

Regarding the game 'the last man standing', why not change it to the last duck quacking. LoL
Jump to: