Topic: Duelbits.com | Casino & Sportsbook | VIP | Instant withdrawals! - page 145. (Read 113627 times)

I think KYC is not really a small time thing in the crypto world anymore. Almost everyone gets asked KYC whatever they do, at this point DeFi projects may start asking for KYC lol, it's literally as common as anything in the crypto world.

This is why I wouldn't be shocked about anything potentially close to it in the casino world as well. It's easier to just give it as soon as possible and then you are going to end up doing a lot better, I personally feel a lot better when I do it first, and then I can continue without a trouble. Because if I don't, and face it later on then it could be due to a problem and I would not want to face that.

They know what games to choose, it are all high volatile games so you might loose more than 10% when wagering 500$, but it are also games that you can win big. I will never play any Big Bass games again, had a very bad streak on that game when I tried it for the first time, so it is on my black list lol.

I think he is pertaining on the limited games offered on Decentralized casino. True decentralized casino runs their game on chain which means their game offered is limited to games that can be run on blockchain like dice, plinko and other typical house game while Centralized casino offers various games which 3rd party game provider offers like slots, game shows and sportsbook.

I knew that there some decentralized casino develop decentralized slots but but still it can’t beat or be compared on the quality of games by slot provider for Centralized casino.

more descentralized doesn't have to mean less fun
why do you think that?

regarding fees
depends on the system, they could use a pool system where you deposit and withdraw directly on their contracts (check dydx exchange or blur marketplace) charging no fees per transaction just a blockchain fee for deposits and withdrawals.

We can only play 5 games there which in my opinion 5 games are not friendly games I mean I have a bad experience in this game except Sweet Powernudge
I know that every user has a different experience in this game, but for me personally it is less attractive so I will miss this one promotion.
By the way the bonus was reduced from the previous weeks usually we will get 30% of the total deposit or wager but now only 10%

This is a nice promotion, wager $500 during the promotion time and players will get $50. It is like a guaranteed 10% rakeback and probably players may wager $500 starting with $50 deposit if they are lucky enough. It must be done fast obviously since the promotion is run between 17:00 and 21:59 UTC only and dont forget to opt-in for anyone who are willing to take this promotion.

My overall gambling profit stats is negative, but I'm in profit on Duelbits. I have lost much in the in-house games of different casinos. I play the slots game occasionally and switch the games frequently. I got 50× to 225× multipliers on different slots game by using this method. I started with $57 deposits on that day, and ended with 150$+ by playing the slots game.

At Duelbits, every Wednesday, we have a Midweek Madness. This week, it will start soon next 11 hours.

You can play those games Sweet Powernudge; Fruit Party 2; Big Bass Splash; The Dog House Megaways; Gems Bonanza and get 10% cash reward.

Visit a promotion page to read its terms: Promotion

A big congratulations mate, this is an amazing win I must say, been a long time I tried my luck on casino games, I decide to try today but unfortunately, I wasn't as lucky as you were.

At first, I won $0.94 dollar on a bet of $0.2 dollar, I was like, "what a good start" since that was my first spin since several months I played casino games last.
After that first win, I played until my bankroll turned zero, I won nothing anymore.
But I am not deterred though, I will play again later in tomorrow, possibly, might get lucky like you.

I strongly agree. It depends on you as a gambler on how your casino want to be. There's no perfect casino in this space, Every casino here has some holes that we need to consider before playing like the one you have mentioned about the decentralized casino that uses multiple blockchain transaction which cost you more fees just to play on a decentralized casino. This isn't the one that majority of the people want given that they spend more on fees, This why most of just just want to play on centralized casino instead and to just accept that fact that the possibility of KYC is right there and you are under their ToS.

man I'm starting to think that I should also try those casino games that depend on luck, I have to learn how to play (until today I've only played plinko ) other casino games that depend on luck, I'm watching some videos on youtube so that I can learn playing. I have to think with which bankroll will be ideal to start playing and how much should I put in each game section and which multiplier will be ideal to play, I know that unlike sports betting which is what I do, in casino games there is no strategy in the game, it all depends on luck, but I already realized that you also need to have good bankroll management and also play just for fun. I ask you: until now are you profitable or are you at a loss since you started playing until today?


I wonder how these decentralized casinos operate without a license? Or is it that they operate without a license? the license was something implemented by the governments, the KYC was also something implemented by the governments, the casinos are forced to have a license and ask their customers for KYC... so far I think that we all cannot change that, we can only obey and we comply with the laws. but the problem comes from some casinos that are abusing the KYC and their TOS to retain their customers' money, there are many absurd situations, imagine a casino letting the customer create an account, make a deposit of 50$, after that customer loses 45$ and when the customer wants to withdraw 5$ the casino denies it and asks for KYC because it accuses the customer of suspicious activity. honestly, it is even regrettable and shameful what certain new casinos have done

In as much as we all clamore for a decentralized casinos where kyc will be non existence, we all should understand that both centralization and decentralization have their pros and cons - and one of the cons of decentralized casinos will be that it's less enjoyable playing there, than it is with playing on centralized system, and also consider the blockchain transaction fees you would have to pay every time you click the spin button, now, imagine clicking spin 100 times and paying blockchain fees 100 times, at the end of the day, if you do not win, you have not only lost money spent on bets, youve also lost money on paying transactions fees.

yes
I take it simple
if the house has a rule
and I want to be in that house
I'll follow the rule, or leave

much easier to think like that imo

though I'm still quite surprised we don't see more descentralized casinos around without KYC

I see that point and yes if that's include with the TOS then gambler might risk their winning money while still in process of verifications
if fate do not favor them,

the chance that they may lose those money back to the house and the reputation will not be affected as
gambler decided to play and risk the money betting back again.

That's definitely the "must" of all casinos, there is no way around it and will never be one. It's the catch all for basically anything that goes wrong or even if it doesn't go wrong we are talking about something that could confirm that it's all okay, which is why every casino will ask for it one time or another. Some ask it beforehand and some ask it later but they will all ask for it from someone one day or another.

Even "the" casino here, the one everyone talks about, the one that says they never ask it beforehand, ends up asking it when there is a huge winner, because when you want to withdraw a million dollars, no KYC would be quite difficult to explain to authorities.

Correct points, but they are a lot smarter than you think. For example, some sites block gambler funds claiming that they found something suspicious and request KYC hoping that the gambler will gamble away his/her winnings before releasing the funds.

This is perfectly legal as stated in their TOS and their reputation stays unaffected.

This has been clear from the starting that they are enforcing KYC for their casino players but if you are not comfortable then find some other options available to you.I am small gambler so not to much trouble to withdraw huge funds and not too much documents needed in my case.

If they arbitrarily and intentionally pull their KYC cards just to gain benefit for their casinos, even they currently are legit ones, their reputation will be damaged with time and it's hard for them to reclaim their reputation.

You need years to build up your legitimacy and reputation but only need one or a few cases to wipe it all. After that, even many years later it is hard to erase shady history in reputation and start to gain a clean legit reputation. Almost impossible. Therefore I don't think good teams behind good casinos will do that.

If they have holes in system that are compromised and they have deep pocket, they will accept it, pay the user and move on with improvement in their infrastructures.

It is the trend for sure, but there are still plenty of legit centralised casinos that don't ask KYC unless absolutely necessary and I can attest to that.

The primary issue here is that many legit crypto gambling sites are enforcing KYC in an unfair manner and use their TOS as their shield which pissed off the anti-KYC crowd and their anger is justified.

The eligible slots really had high volatility. But I was lucky to get some good multipliers by getting the bonus round. I had got a 225× multiplier by getting the bonus round. I also got some 50× to 100× multipliers. It was a lucky journey for me. Although I hadn't won anything good from the 50 free spins. Here is the screenshot of 225× multiplier which I got from the bonus spins when I was playing to complete the wager.