Even if that could be another good thing but I think reputation is more than anything in this. For me personally, I really don't really expect any bonuses for each month, even though it's good enough to satisfy myself more, but even if it doesn't exist, I don't consider it a problem because of course there are other things, namely the reputation you get in this case.
As long as I'm comfortable with them and as long as their reputation is always good in my eyes, whether there's a bonus or not every month, I don't really have a problem with that.
But then again there are clearly different perspectives here and this is my view for a casino.
I agree with your opinion, because every gambler positions the reputation factor for the main assessment of each casino site, but there are several important points that are bound from every general perspective, including some gamblers want bonuses given by casinos as loyalty to old customers, from the other side of the casino giving bonuses to compete with other top casino competitors to retain each other's customers, so it doesn't matter if you choose giving casino bonuses is only optional and I also agree we will value reputation as the main point for each casino.
Good reputation is the bed rock of every casino, and putting the casino's reputation first should be the top priority of every sensible and serious gambler, and not bonuses.
What exactly is the essence of a bonus when you get it but lose your initial money due to the casino not being genuine?
I think 1xBit is a true example of what I am talking about, it's a true example of the fact that reputation is much more valuable than bonuses.
Just imagine right now that 1xbit offers us some juicy deposit bonus, and us knowing how bad their reputation is, I believe that no body In their right senses will care about the bonus, gamblers who already know that 1xbit has a very bad reputation will still prefer to keep depositing and gambling on the casino that is not offering any bonuses but has a very good reputation.