The DNS records were updated and develcuy now has control of devcoin.org
Please rollback, the DNS setup is not working as expected. I need help from the registrar account in order to fix this.
- develCuy
Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated - page 39. (Read 1059157 times)
Please rollback, the DNS setup is not working as expected. I need help from the registrar account in order to fix this.
- develCuy
I hope that you will cooperate to transfer your duties to the admins team.
develcuy received the credentials for the devcoin.org hosting account today. He should move the site and change the credentials right away.
Source code of devcoin.org is now on my server and just awaiting for MarkM to update the DNS records.
- develCuy
The DNS records were updated and develcuy now has control of devcoin.org
Thanks for everything you did, ctya.
You are welcome!
I came to DevCoin at a time that suited me and the project.
That time has passed.
Thank you for your service to this project and the community and wishing you well in your other work.
Thank you all for your kind words.
Thanks for everything you did, ctya.
You are welcome!
I came to DevCoin at a time that suited me and the project.
That time has passed.
Thank you. As a dvc whale I cast my vote for Traxo as a lead dev, although he’s very busy and may not be able to take the job.
Thanks for everything you did, ctya.
You are welcome!
I came to DevCoin at a time that suited me and the project.
That time has passed.
Thank you for your service to this project and the community and wishing you well in your other work.
Just catching up on a bit of backlog and seen the thread and discussion going on here.
I think the problem was 50 shares was being sent to the last historic share count of devtome where the user had not written any new content. That obviously needed to stop. Perhaps as there was disagreement for these funds to be sent to a user or group with no outline clearly explaining what the funds would be used for maybe burning the devcoins would have been a better option this round? As seems this has caused ctyx to feel the need to leave the dve community, this saddens after all the hard work I have seen ctyx produce recently for dvc.
I should add for clarity that as like bitcoin, devcoin is open source, has no "official" leader or owner, rather we are a collective of people coming together to try create and share something we believe in enough to invest our time and effort into it. That said... the lead dev usually is the one driving the particular cryptocurrency as they are the one to implement the code changes and requests etc. If there is no lead dev then how is the project to develop and progress at all? I say this as ctyx is listed as the only Devcoin Developer on https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin_human_resources
Fuzzybear
I think the problem was 50 shares was being sent to the last historic share count of devtome where the user had not written any new content. That obviously needed to stop. Perhaps as there was disagreement for these funds to be sent to a user or group with no outline clearly explaining what the funds would be used for maybe burning the devcoins would have been a better option this round? As seems this has caused ctyx to feel the need to leave the dve community, this saddens after all the hard work I have seen ctyx produce recently for dvc.
I should add for clarity that as like bitcoin, devcoin is open source, has no "official" leader or owner, rather we are a collective of people coming together to try create and share something we believe in enough to invest our time and effort into it. That said... the lead dev usually is the one driving the particular cryptocurrency as they are the one to implement the code changes and requests etc. If there is no lead dev then how is the project to develop and progress at all? I say this as ctyx is listed as the only Devcoin Developer on https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin_human_resources
Fuzzybear
Excellent brief about governance in Free Software projects FuzzyBear! Just let me add that I'm part of the Development team along Qtera. I don't know why I wasn't listed in the HR wiki, but you can see my commits to devcoin core here: https://github.com/devcoin/core/commits/master
Whatever..., take a breath tonight... tomorrow we have a lot of work to do for delivering round 99!
Go go Devcoin!!
- develCuy
I hope that you will cooperate to transfer your duties to the admins team.
develcuy received the credentials for the devcoin.org hosting account today. He should move the site and change the credentials right away.
Source code of devcoin.org is now on my server and just awaiting for MarkM to update the DNS records.
- develCuy
Thanks for everything you did, ctya.
You are welcome!
I came to DevCoin at a time that suited me and the project.
That time has passed.
I am also sorry to see you go Ctya, you were always motivated and you have a great work ethic. It was a pleasure to work with you. Thanks for everything dude
I hope that you will cooperate to transfer your duties to the admins team.
develcuy received the credentials for the devcoin.org hosting account today. He should move the site and change the credentials right away.
I hope that you will cooperate to transfer your duties to the admins team.
novacadian received the credentials for the devtome.com hosting account today. He should move the site and change the credentials right away.
Thanks for everything you did, ctya.
You are welcome!
I came to DevCoin at a time that suited me and the project.
That time has passed.
Just catching up on a bit of backlog and seen the thread and discussion going on here.
I think the problem was 50 shares was being sent to the last historic share count of devtome where the user had not written any new content. That obviously needed to stop. Perhaps as there was disagreement for these funds to be sent to a user or group with no outline clearly explaining what the funds would be used for maybe burning the devcoins would have been a better option this round? As seems this has caused ctyx to feel the need to leave the dve community, this saddens after all the hard work I have seen ctyx produce recently for dvc.
I think the problem was 50 shares was being sent to the last historic share count of devtome where the user had not written any new content. That obviously needed to stop. Perhaps as there was disagreement for these funds to be sent to a user or group with no outline clearly explaining what the funds would be used for maybe burning the devcoins would have been a better option this round? As seems this has caused ctyx to feel the need to leave the dve community, this saddens after all the hard work I have seen ctyx produce recently for dvc.
This is the second round which has had a moritorium placed on all and any DevTome rewards for the reasons you have stated, FuzzyBear. The DVCs were accumulating for future use in the DevTome Budget. One can only speculate, yet my guess is that without the 50 shares being assigned to DevTome (down from 100 btw) that it would mean more DVCs for ctya's 25+ shares. Just an assumption on my part and with his resignation it is somewhat moot.
- Nova
Just catching up on a bit of backlog and seen the thread and discussion going on here.
I think the problem was 50 shares was being sent to the last historic share count of devtome where the user had not written any new content. That obviously needed to stop. Perhaps as there was disagreement for these funds to be sent to a user or group with no outline clearly explaining what the funds would be used for maybe burning the devcoins would have been a better option this round? As seems this has caused ctyx to feel the need to leave the dve community, this saddens after all the hard work I have seen ctyx produce recently for dvc.
I should add for clarity that as like bitcoin, devcoin is open source, has no "official" leader or owner, rather we are a collective of people coming together to try create and share something we believe in enough to invest our time and effort into it. That said... the lead dev usually is the one driving the particular cryptocurrency as they are the one to implement the code changes and requests etc. If there is no lead dev then how is the project to develop and progress at all? I say this as ctyx is listed as the only Devcoin Developer on https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin_human_resources
Fuzzybear
I think the problem was 50 shares was being sent to the last historic share count of devtome where the user had not written any new content. That obviously needed to stop. Perhaps as there was disagreement for these funds to be sent to a user or group with no outline clearly explaining what the funds would be used for maybe burning the devcoins would have been a better option this round? As seems this has caused ctyx to feel the need to leave the dve community, this saddens after all the hard work I have seen ctyx produce recently for dvc.
I should add for clarity that as like bitcoin, devcoin is open source, has no "official" leader or owner, rather we are a collective of people coming together to try create and share something we believe in enough to invest our time and effort into it. That said... the lead dev usually is the one driving the particular cryptocurrency as they are the one to implement the code changes and requests etc. If there is no lead dev then how is the project to develop and progress at all? I say this as ctyx is listed as the only Devcoin Developer on https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin_human_resources
Fuzzybear
UTB is right, DeVCoin is worth very little, but the accounting fees and risks are still high. It's a lot of hassle for little gain.
I am resigning from DeVCoin.
I will continue my roles until the next round.
ctya
I am resigning from DeVCoin.
I will continue my roles until the next round.
ctya
This might be the worst time to see you go Ctya, but I hope that you will cooperate to transfer your duties to the admins team. I have created a new thread in the admins forum with my proposal, under the Operations battle front (sub-forum).
That said, I'm still thankful to you for all the key contributions you did to the Devcoin Project, you are really helpful when you want it. It is unfortunate to see you go this way.
- develCuy
Thanks for everything you did, ctya.
Taxes on crypto are getting too complicated and dangerous:
https://www.reddit.com/r/tax/comments/9tcnu8/did_i_ruin_my_life_by_trading_crypto/
The problems are the following:
1. The tax code for crypto is ambiguous, there is no widely agreed upon way to calculate taxes.
2. When exchanges fail, the trading information is lost, so it can be impossible to calculate trading gains and losses.
3. Accounting fees can be very high for crypto trading, sometimes more than the actual money made.
4. It is possible to owe more in taxes than was actually cashed out.
5. The rules change, and some of those changes are retroactive, so even if taxes are filed correctly today, in future tax collectors can claim that the taxes were not filed correctly and impose arbitrary penalties.
Devcoin is worth very little, but the accounting fees and risks are still high. It's a lot of hassle for little gain.
Because of this, unfortunately, I am going to resign from devcoin, until taxes are simplified or there's a big tax free cryptocoin jurisdiction, which I don't expect to happen for a long time if ever.
I don't want anyone to get in trouble because of something I'm doing or developing. I'll do the accounting for round 94, after that devcoin developers can handle the receiver files however they want.
I'm sorry for leaving. I wish there was another way, but I don't see one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/tax/comments/9tcnu8/did_i_ruin_my_life_by_trading_crypto/
The problems are the following:
1. The tax code for crypto is ambiguous, there is no widely agreed upon way to calculate taxes.
2. When exchanges fail, the trading information is lost, so it can be impossible to calculate trading gains and losses.
3. Accounting fees can be very high for crypto trading, sometimes more than the actual money made.
4. It is possible to owe more in taxes than was actually cashed out.
5. The rules change, and some of those changes are retroactive, so even if taxes are filed correctly today, in future tax collectors can claim that the taxes were not filed correctly and impose arbitrary penalties.
Devcoin is worth very little, but the accounting fees and risks are still high. It's a lot of hassle for little gain.
Because of this, unfortunately, I am going to resign from devcoin, until taxes are simplified or there's a big tax free cryptocoin jurisdiction, which I don't expect to happen for a long time if ever.
I don't want anyone to get in trouble because of something I'm doing or developing. I'll do the accounting for round 94, after that devcoin developers can handle the receiver files however they want.
I'm sorry for leaving. I wish there was another way, but I don't see one.
UTB is right, DeVCoin is worth very little, but the accounting fees and risks are still high. It's a lot of hassle for little gain.
I am resigning from DeVCoin.
I will continue my roles until the next round.
ctya
...For that to happen, I kindly ask you (for the fifth time) to elaborate your plans for each of the roles/duties in the admins forum.
"admins forum" is incorrect. That is not where we communicate about DeVCoin. It is a place created by you and Nova and it was never necessary to have a new place to communicate.
So you can ask a sixth time, and I will still not go to your side-channel to communicate out of public view to satisfy your need to hide the communication.
We can discuss it here.
Ctya, you have 25.8 shares = 18725795 DVC being paid to you this round (604058 DVC per day)
Thanks for making that clear.
To recap
25.8 shares to me for hosting the two primary sites, hosting multiple full nodes, hosting receiver files, and much more
50 shares to yourself for a project with no activity and an idea that it might be used in the future.
I will ask again:
Can you suspend those 50 shares until you have a proof-of-concept?
https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin&#voting
cheers,
ctya
Hi ctya,
This reminded me that there is a candidate willing to unburden you of the Bounty Factorum position. Could you please outline the duties the position requires (to aid in the position's budgeting) on the thread found at:
https://trollkeep.com/smf/index.php?topic=11.0
Thanks!
- Nova
The position is described at
https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin_human_resources
If you want to expand on that description for the next person who takes the position, please edit Devtome as this is historically appropriate.
50 shares to yourself...
Can you tell me what makes you think like that?
I believe we already agreed that there was an assignment of 50 shares to a wallet controlled by you.
None of this is, yet, etched in stone as the final DevTome budget has not been formalized. develCuy has simply assigned 50 shares (down from 100 if memory serves) in the meantime.
Feedback is welcome on these plans which are yet to be formalized.
- Nova
Feedback is welcome on these plans which are yet to be formalized.
- Nova
Please let us all know which voting process was used.
https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin&#voting
ctya
Ctya, you have 25.8 shares = 18725795 DVC being paid to you this round (604058 DVC per day)
Thanks for making that clear.
To recap
25.8 shares to me for hosting the two primary sites, hosting multiple full nodes, hosting receiver files, and much more
50 shares to yourself for a project with no activity and an idea that it might be used in the future.
I will ask again:
Can you suspend those 50 shares until you have a proof-of-concept?
https://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin&#voting
cheers,
ctya
Hi ctya,
This reminded me that there is a candidate willing to unburden you of the Bounty Factorum position. Could you please outline the duties the position requires (to aid in the position's budgeting) on the thread found at:
https://trollkeep.com/smf/index.php?topic=11.0
Thanks!
- Nova
Jump to: