Here in El Salvador, sociology was rolled out and if you believe the survey "what citizens of the country think about Bitcoin" conducted by the Institute of Public Opinion of the Central American University (UCA) and published the results on January 14, it turns out that so far only 27% of respondents believe in Bitcoin, a total of 1,298 citizens participated in the survey.
In particular, 25.6% believe that it has benefited the rich, 20.5% the government, and only 10.9% believe that the adoption has benefited the residents of the country. Approximately 60% of respondents say that the $70 million spent on the purchase of bitcoin did not affect the economic condition of the country. Despite this, there was hope for a better future.
Only 20% of respondents believe that the economy has improved, and 57.2% believe that it has remained the same.
Also, 6 out of 10 citizens oppose government spending on BTC. In general, respondents indicated that the use of Bitcoin in the country should be voluntary, not mandatory
https://uca.edu.sv/iudop/wp-content/uploads/Bol.-Eva-de-ano-2021-MOD.pdfThere might be some value in capturing aspects of public sentiment early on in the bitcoin transitioning process, and many of us who have been in bitcoin for a while likely recognize that some of the compounding benefits of being in bitcoin could take a while to be really felt - maybe even in the 4 year to 10 year time horizon. On the other hand, in El Salvador, there are various actions being taken right away.. and of course, those short term actions are going to direct and incentivize various kinds of short-term changes. .that surely could be felt in more immediate ways...
El Salvador is the only country that shows its seriousness in adopting bitcoin where they have created a bitcoin ATM for transactions in the country, of course this has a very good impact on the survival of bitcoin in the future because it is currently in the midst of declining bitcoin prices in the world. the stock market, of course, bitcoin really needs adoption from developing countries to be able to regain public trust so that its price can increase again as in a few years ago
Bitcoin does not need any of these things.
Sure, there can be some benefits to bitcoin in terms of increased adoption, but bitcoin is going to survive whether it is adopted or not...and most likely, in terms of Gresham law type principles, people, businesses, institutions, and governments are going to come to bitcoin whether they want to or not. The soundest of monies attracts capital into it, even if there are a lot of people failing/refusing to appreciate that bitcoin is the real deal in terms of the soundest of money out there.
Don't get me wrong.. greater levels of adoption in various levels (also could be referred to as network effects) does likely cause bitcoin to get BIGGER faster, but whether bitcoin goes faster or slowly does not really change too much of anything in terms of a certain amount of ossification that already exists in bitcoin and tik tok every 10 minutes another block comes, whether you jump on board and appreciate its value or not.
I often see from various developing countries that they say they want to adopt bitcoin but in reality it is only a discourse.very different from what El Salvador is doing they really show their seriousness in adopting bitcoin long term even where they have created ATMs bitcoin for transactions in the country, the adoption of the country of El Salvador can at least return to make bitcoin better viability in the future amid the decline in bitcoin prices in recent years
Fair enough.
There is a certain amount of value that comes through actual actions - including the way that El Salvador is attempting to facilitate the building of various bitcoin infrastructure. There are also several countries that have had representatives making statements, and the actions surely vary in terms of none of them really going in as bold as El Salvador, and some of these matters will take time in terms of attempting to learn from the experiences and practices of various other jurisdictions, whether at the city level or even smaller jurisdictions such as cities that end up making some moves towards bitcoin adoption/acceptance.