Sounds like nearly pure nonsense to me since no one is forced to hold their value in bitcoin. Each and every citizen has a choice.. to hold their value in bitcoin, dollars or some combination.
Makes a lot of sense to grumble about having more options. NOT.
Of course, any merchant (or provider of a good or service) is required to accept bitcoin, but they do not have to hold the value in bitcoin for any period of time, and of course, there could be complaints about being force to used systems that allow consumers to spend their bitcoins - and I thought that I heard that the El Salvador government was going to be helping merchants to set up those kinds of systems that allow for the acceptance of bitcoin, too?
Anyhow, hardly seems like any kind of oppressive law, even if some folks living there (likely a considerable minority) want to disagree and protest over such a new system that seems to provide more options to people, overall and actually certain ways that people living in El Salvador might be able to become more richie in terms of how they might be able to save into a kind of monetary system (talking about bitcoin) that has pretty damned decent chances of appreciating in value compared to the dollar.. sure no guarantees, but seems pretty damned likely that folks who are able to save some of their BTC rather than spend them are going to have good chances of increasing rather than decreasing their wealth.... especially if they are holding over several years.. 4 years or more and likely will be doing even MOAR better the longer that they are able to figure out systems in which they are able to save portions of their BTC longer such as 10 years or more.