What do you mean about maximalists being unhappy?
Strike.me gives the option to convert right away to dollars or to stay in bitcoin, and so what? people should have those kinds of options.
Are you referring to that? or something else?
Let's say hypothetically 90% of the merchants (or the peeps receiving bitcoin) convert to dollars, so there ends up being less demand for bitcoin because almost all of the merchants/recipients are converting to dollars as soon as they receive the bitcoin. Sure, I am being generous with my hypothetical, but surely we already know that strike makes it easy to convert to dollars, no?
Given the potential for vast conversion from bitcoin to dollars, do you believe that overall that there is going to be less demand for bitcoin because of the allowance to convert to dollars, even with a big assumption that a vast majority of merchants/recipients could chose to convert to dollars right away?
I would bet that so called "maximalists" would prefer that people have options to do whatever they would like and they would likely figure it out, sooner or later, that it is good to hang onto some bitcoin (maybe even there might be times that it is better to hold more bitcoin and other times that it might be good to hold some in bitcoin and the other part in dollars) rather than converting everything back and forth to dollars... might take some of them a while to figure out some balancing that is comfortable for their own particular circumstances, but I am sure that they will have way more abilities to figure it out when they are actually having experiences and opportunities to use it rather than merely speculating about what they may or may not do if they are NOT in such a position to try it out.
I disagree. The maximalists were given this expectation that bitcoin will be used as currency after the passing of the law making it legal tender in El Salvador. I know not everyone will be disappointed, however, many will be. Also, strike.me users will not be converting to dollars. They will be converting to dollar derivatives similar to USDT.
You seem to be wanting to pigeonhole bitcoin maximalists, and surely the way that El Salvador is focusing on strike shows that they can see how bitcoin can be used in ways to engage in cheap transactions and potentially to achieve a few objectives in the country - perhaps reducing how badly a large number of El Salvadoreans (at least those using the remittance procedures) are getting ripped off by remittance fees, increasing the number of banked (or at least bitcoin provides some ways for a large segment of the El Salvador population to achieve some kind of banking - even if it might be inferior) and maybe they are thinking that they are able to bring some jobs and industries to their country - including a seemingly after the fact recognition of possible volcano mining.
It seems to me that a lot of so called maximalists are somewhat surprised by the suddenness of this move of an actual country making legal tender out of bitcoin but also that a country would have approached a kind of adoption of bitcoin in the way that it seems to be playing out in El Salvador, including a kind of emphasis on the transactional side of bitcoin rather than bitcoin's likely stronger feature and use case as a store of value.. So maybe after getting over some of the shock and trying to grapple with the fast moving space and to absorb what is going on, maybe later on bitcoin maximalists might become disappointed if you want to ascribe that bullshit expectation to them - because in the end there seems to be hardly anything to get disappointed about unless you make some shit up and say that bitcoin maximalists had some kind of expectation that they did not have.
Sure down the road bitcoin maximalists could become disappointed if El Salvador ends up reversing itself or NOT following through with their going live of the law 90 days from the publication of the law, and so if they end up cancelling or repealing the law before it goes into effect or soon thereafter, then sure at that point, maybe some bitcoin maximalists will become disappointed because they (we) got their (our) hopes up about some further innovations and development and new bitcoin dynamics that could not be reasonably read in any way that is other than bullish for bitcoin unless you want to make some shit up about what bitcoiners were supposedly expecting.
In other words, almost any kind of adoption seems bullish for bitcoin, and I am not sure how you could figure a way that the news is not bullish for bitcoin. Even if the legal tender law were to be repealed, there could still continue to be ongoing bitcoin usage and developments in El Salvador and surely El Salvador has shown that they are friendly and receptive to bitcoin, even if they end up taking away the legal tender law designation.
Again, you are coming up with some kind of weird characterizations of what may or may not be going on. Sure they do not have a dollar printer, but they have the Colon as their national currency, and then now they are going to have bitcoin too.... so sure there will likely be some dollar pegged currencies coming into El Salvador, and who knows if some of the dollar banks are going to want to play hard ball with El Salvador and close up shop there, in El Salvador, but it seems kind of crazy for you, bbc.reporter, to be speculating about how you know how things are going to play out, and it sounds as if you are just guessing or making up shit.
Personally, I have no problems with attempting to speculate about various kinds of scenarios that could play out, but just stating some kind of vision of the future that seems to be a bit detached from reality does not seem like a very productive way of even attempting to speculate about more likely scenarios.
At least for now, the more likely scenarios have to do with their recent passage of the bitcoin as legal tender law has drawn increased attention on El Salvador.. including that a lot of bitcoin related business are likely going to want to move or develop there, and surely there may well be some citizens in El Salvador who are studying up upon bitcoin, as well. I am not even proclaiming shitcoins are not going to go to El Salvador, so it seems quite likely that shitcoins will be going to El Salvador too.. and sure could the pressures from outside governments and from outside financial institutions cause El Salvador to modify the legal tender law that they already passed? Yes.. I think so.. but until we hear news about something like that, we should be trying to consider more likely scenarios that at least in the short to medium term there are going to be a quite a few people and businesses attempting to ramp up for the law going into effect in early September... and just ramping up has consequences and impacts.. so we will see? We will see?
You might want to get some bitcoin in case it catches on, bbc.reporter.