The article summarized some of their experience as:
- There still seems to be a lot of misinformation on bitcoin amongst the population, to the point that many confuse it with the Chivo System as being essentially the same.
- Efforts to properly educate the population on using the Chivo System seem scarce and even lower when it comes to bitcoin itself.
- There are still many places that still do not accept bitcoin, and this is even more so once you move out of the centric touristic areas.
- If you want to travel the country on bitcoin, be prepared to route your itinerary based on where they actually accept bitcoin, and not necessarily on where you intended to go.
- Museums and other Heritage related places still seem to currently only accept fiat.
I’ve read about a dozen or so of the entries in the diary, and each one was worth the time to get more insights on the day-to-day over there. The entry for day 28 was particularly shocking, since they claim that it seems feasible to withdraw USD (by selling BTC) on their ATMs, and perform a RBF. Not sure if this is really true, but it would be one hell of an oversight if so.
see:
(diary – Italian left/ English right) https://bitcoinitaliapodcast.it/missione-el-salvador
(article) https://cointelegraph.com/news/around-el-salvador-in-45-days-a-bitcoin-only-travel-story
Slowness in implementation is quite expected in governments of 3rd world countries. This is not the real problem, I reckon. The problem is I hope that article does not imply that El Salvador is only larping and using bitcoin only for their propaganda campaign against the IMF. In reality, bitcoin does not need legal tender status to be used everywhere.
Also, the comment on their ATMs. This might be okay, I reckon. If bitcoin is used as a currency, it should be allowed to function similar to other forex currencies. However, you might have something that makes this a real problem?
In any case, maybe El Salvador is right in using bitcoin as a tool for political propaganda. Was this not how the community behind bitcoin began? This might help countries for real adoption.
I am not going to assert whether I believe that Bukele might have employed x, y or z strategies better, because there is a lot of discretion within the realm of politics and even within the realm of running a business that you may well be striving to be profitable or successful in some way to carry out certain missions.
In other words, we might all acknowledge that if we were in the same position, we would interact differently and show our public profile differently (more professionally, perhaps?), but in the end, we also might acknowledge that there could be quite a few advantages in attempting a kind of public and flamboyant character when adopting something that is already known to be controversial right from the getgo.