So much optimism, yet so much so disappointment. Donald trump's is starting to look like some kind of black sheep because of what or should I say the influence of what his meme coin is doing to the market. I guess the mass crowd of people opting that the whole support for Bitcoin during his campaign was just a mirage were actually right caused I mean with this little deed his done, it's definitely clear the fellow doesn't give a damn to the interest of Bitcoin in the united states.
Okay, I got a little un-lazy here for a second so I could do a I-told-you-so post here:
Trump to buy Bakkt, a crypto exchangeArticle on future US president competing with Bitcoin & cryptoTrump will compete directly with BitcoinYour attempts to argue don't even seem topical to this thread, and so I suppose part of your purpose is to get views so you are posting off-topic in an already existing thread, since if you were to make your own thread, it is quite likely that no one would view it. Aren't there any Trump threads? since you currently seem to be Trump-obsessed in your desire to bash on bitcoin.
Even the WO thread would be better than posting your ongoing off-topicness in this thread.
It's just a crazy state of the world, that's all. Bitcoin started off as a means of thwarting government control over transactions, and now it's a football in US politics that will live and die by whatever political winds are blowing here.
Yeah, sure, of course, there is a bit of a crazy state of the world, yet your conclusion that bitcoin lives/dies based on US politics is fucking retarded and not even close to being any kind of accurate assessment of some kind of a realistic scenario that might end up playing out, [...]
Always a sign I won the argument when I reduce the responder to spitting out a mindless hysterical rant laced with expletives
.
Congrats, you delusional twat, and I believe that I sufficiently responded to all of your substantive points that you might have had made..and probably even gave you various benefits of the doubt on some of your repetitive, delusional and intentional bitcoin bashing nonsense.. yet you keep repeating pie in the sky illogical assertions as if they were realistic scenarios, and not even seeming to be trying to set forth any kinds of reasonable facts, arguments and/or logical conclusions.
You proclaim that you know bitcoin because you were purportedly able to predict some variation of Trump's nutjob short-term behaviors?
No, I predict Trump's behavior the same way anybody would predict anybody's behavior: by looking at their past behavior. And I know Bitcoin because I am an engineer who has written systems far more complex than Bitcoin in my decades of experience, not because of what I know about Trump (which.... makes no sense...
).
You also make no sense, and the fact that you might know technical matters has not seemed to help you in terms of understanding bitcoin and/or even bitcoin's investment thesis... including other dumb assertions that you have made, whether related to politics and/or various other ways of attempting to outline reasonable probabilities and/or how individuals might want to invest and/or hedge in such circumstances. You have probably said dumb things that fit into other categories too, but I suppose I have listed enough for now... perhaps even including that you might have an o.k. sense of humor, if you would admit that you were largely just outlining your various life-fantasies.
Huh? If Trump bought a bunch of BTC, and then the price of BTC goes up, then why wouldn't that help him?
There's no evidence he did, but why on earth would he
buy Bitcoin
If you were to understand how evidence works, there is direct evidence, indirect evidence and reasonable inference about evidence. You likely know about these different categories, even though you tend to present selective spins about how certain facts might lead to your frequently nonsensical conclusions.
You seem to be fantasizing if you believe that Trump has not bought bitcoin... You claim that Trump is manipulating bitcoin, and you admit that Trump is a greedy and untrustworthy twat, yet at the same time, you want to proclaim that there is no evidence that Trump bought any bitcoin? Do you even believe your own crap?
when he can make far more money simply making up his own coin for free and then using the power of the US presidency to pump his own coin at the expense of Bitcoin?
I can concede that Trump is a dweeb and even concede that he does not seem to be very smart, yet he seems to be smart enough to do more than one thing at the same time, whether it is him or people helping him out.
In other words, there is a world of possibilities that Trump could be fucking around with various shitcoins (including creating variations of his own and variation of family coins and variations of his products or NFTs to sell) and he can buy some bitcoin at the same time.
Trump can buy and sell bitcoin at the same time, too... or he can have others helping him with whatever trading maneuvers to do whether they are attempts to directly manipulate or to benefit from manipulate or to merely hedge.
You are retarded if you conclude that bitcoin buying would be excluded from this kind of circumstances..and not that we even need to know either way.. since it may not matter too much, except for your dumbass theory that Trump is both going to try to play bitcoin like his little toy-thing, and also that he is going to be able to be successful in negatively manipulating bitcoin while all the bitcoin maxis cry to their impending (yet unknown) bankruptcies.
You are a nutjob with lame pie in the sky, self-selective, fantasy-landia nutjob theories. hahahahahaha... and I probably could think of a few more non-complementary labels. By the way, I will conclude that you do seem like a human, since even a bot could not consistently come up with such high levels of ongoing dumb..
Trump would never be able to buy very much of Bitcoin whereas he would own almost all of his own coin.
You speculate that Trump does not know how to use agents and/or debt? or other ways of moving around capital in order to accumulate bitcoin, whether in self-storage or through some custodian? Whether through his own name or through some agent(s)? You are ongoingly just making shit up that does not even make logical sense and is even inconsistent with facts that are already known about Trump.
American First! And, unfortunately, Bitcoin is an evil woke "globalist" thing, whereas Trump's coin is "MADE IN THE USA"!
Sure it is fine that Trump might assert and value "made in the USA," yet I doubt that his actions are necessarily consistent with various slogans that he had made from time to time... You had even admitted Trump is a liar, and then now, all of a sudden, you want to proclaim that he is guided (and perhaps limited) by some kind of creed? Get real, or at least more real than you have been being up until now.. or maybe I should suggest that you grow the fuck up, with your seemingly out of touch childish assertions.
I don't pretend to know what Trump is going to do, but this seems like the easiest possible way he could make himself the richest man in the world, e.g. by minting his own coin and tweaking the laws/regulations to make sure his replaces Bitcoin in terms of market share (he could do this merely by making a few statements, then leaning on the SEC/etc. to threaten new regs for Bitcoin [and not for Trump's coin]).
You might want to get on his advisor's team just in case he needs some help in these matters. You seem to have a lot of this figured out.. and I suppose you give investment advice, too?
We're getting off the subject of El Salvador here,
You think?
but there are a lot of parallels here in that in both cases it's the Bitcoin price level depending on the whims of political leaders supporting it's price.
I am glad that you were able to stay focused and to bring us back to your recognition of such supposed connection between governmental actions of the USA and El Salvador... which is also probably a pretty lame connection, even though surely political leaders can influence policy directions in a variety of ways, whether we are referring to bitcoin and/or shitcoins and/other related policies that might be related to economics and/or technology.
