[EMC] EMERCOIN — Blockchain Service Platform. PoS&PoW | BTC merge-mined - page 96.

ryanb

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

I am getting this error when i run the 3.2 v wallet

http://prntscr.com/6pxq66

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

Thanks.

all compiled, activated and pool now up and syncronized with old version

Thanks

EvgenijM86

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

You can use tags - https://github.com/EvgenijM86/emercoin/tags

For example:
git checkout v0.3.2emc

I will also update master branch so it would point to last good version. Currently it points to 0.4.0. Edit: changed master to 0.3.2.

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

Quote from: maxihatop on March 31, 2015, 10:37:17 AM

> is this to apply even to pool daemon or only for clients?

Pool daemon, too.

I had not the old binary to use again, can you point me on the right Git tree version to download the good source to use (actually my local sorce is sync with latest source)?

thanks

K1773R

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1008

/dev/null

Quote from: Fixx on March 31, 2015, 09:45:09 AM

Due to unstable behaviour of new version 0.4.0 (time to time lack synchronization happening), we strictly recommend return EmerCoin wallet to version 0.3.2, which is stable. Please, backup wallet.dat before update, and delete whole blockchain 0.4.0.

Code:

emercoind getinfo
{
    "version" : "v0.2.4emc-9-ga88cb63-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 60003,
...

this one is still supported? works fine for me. would be good if you send out an alert or notificate ppl in case of a hardfork.
just wondering, as its working as expected.

maxihatop

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 12

> is this to apply even to pool daemon or only for clients?

Pool daemon, too.

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

Quote from: Fixx on March 31, 2015, 09:45:09 AM

Due to unstable behaviour of new version 0.4.0 (time to time lack synchronization happening), we strictly recommend return EmerCoin wallet to version 0.3.2, which is stable. Please, backup wallet.dat before update, and delete whole blockchain 0.4.0.

is this to apply even to pool daemon or only for clients?

1h ago the daemon has died in pool without any reason.

Fixx

hero member

Activity: 535

Merit: 501

EMC

Due to unstable behaviour of new version 0.4.0 (time to time lack synchronization happening), we strictly recommend return EmerCoin wallet to version 0.3.2, which is stable. Please, backup wallet.dat before update, and delete whole blockchain 0.4.0.

TrackCoin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

I knew one EMC very well...

bhokor

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Alcurex is a reliable finnland exchange, they are making a good work

MessyCoin

sr. member

Activity: 458

Merit: 250

Quote from: maxihatop on March 28, 2015, 12:16:18 PM

Unfortunately, right now exist only single voting place, where we can vote for add EMC to exchange: https://askcoin.net/votes
and there is no alternatives. I tried to include EMC into usecryptos voting list, they charged 0.15BTC week ago, and did nothing.

For vote on AskCoin, need to be registered. If it is convenient for you, please register from my referral link: https://askcoin.net/ref/4235

Unfortunately I don't know anyone who runs an exchange. coin-swap.net made a good exchange until they closed down. I've since contacted poloniex.com and shapeshift.io, but they have not chosen to add EMC at this time.

https://askcoin.net/votes appears to be the only option available today, but I have no experience with askcoin. I worry that sending BTC to donation address will result in nothing - or can someone with experience say that they always add the coin with most votes?

Regarding poloniex, new coin request can still be made at https://poloniex.com/coinRequest

EemerCoin is a fantastic oppotunity for any exchange, with exciting coin development. EMC had the highest volume on coin-swap.net for most days. I think we must be patient for a new exchange to come forward.

Does anyone have other suggestion?

maxihatop

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 12

Unfortunately, right now exist only single voting place, where we can vote for add EMC to exchange: https://askcoin.net/votes
and there is no alternatives. I tried to include EMC into usecryptos voting list, they charged 0.15BTC week ago, and did nothing.

For vote on AskCoin, need to be registered. If it is convenient for you, please register from my referral link: https://askcoin.net/ref/4235

ManofOneway

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: Valermos on March 25, 2015, 02:49:23 AM

Quote from: ManofOneway on March 08, 2015, 07:34:08 AM

I have requested EMC be listed on Cryptoine, if people vote for the coin it will be listed fairly quickly, also if you register your vote counts as 5 points instead of 2

https://cryptoine.com/voting

Cryptoine was hacked... Sad

yes i know, i just said farewell to some more hard earned btc. Any update on getting this listed on an exchange?

Valermos

full member

Activity: 854

Merit: 100

Quote from: ManofOneway on March 08, 2015, 07:34:08 AM

I have requested EMC be listed on Cryptoine, if people vote for the coin it will be listed fairly quickly, also if you register your vote counts as 5 points instead of 2

https://cryptoine.com/voting

Cryptoine was hacked... Sad

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

With only 1.54 installed now it compiles.

thanks

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

1) I have:

1.46.1-7ubuntu3 and 1.48.0-3

2) It not compile with the same error.

Now I try to install the 1.54

EvgenijM86

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Ok...

1) Can you tell me what version of boost do you use? You can check that out in package manager like synaptic.

2) Try compile bitcoin 0.8.6 to see if it works.

git clone -b 0.8 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
cd bitcoin/src
make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-

If it does not work then there is some problems in how your libraries are currently installed. In this case I do not want to adjust our code to a broken or non-standard setup. Because if I do it might break on our end.

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

Hi download the source again from scratch as after a git pull it did not compile, but error is still present:

Code:

p
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/opt/multi-pool/src/emercoin/src -I/opt/multi-pool/src/emercoin/src/obj -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/opt/multi-pool/src/emercoin/src/leveldb/include -I/opt/multi-pool/src/emercoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/net.d -o obj/net.o net.cpp
net.cpp:408:25: error: reference to ‘uint64_t’ is ambiguous
 int GetExternalIPbySTUN(uint64_t rnd, struct sockaddr_in *mapped, const char **srv);
                         ^
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/include/stdint.h:9:0,
                 from /usr/include/inttypes.h:27,
                 from uint256.h:11,
                 from util.h:33,
                 from bignum.h:12,
                 from main.h:9,
                 from db.h:9,
                 from net.cpp:7:
/usr/include/stdint.h:55:27: note: candidates are: typedef long unsigned int uint64_t
 typedef unsigned long int uint64_t;
                           ^
In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/compiler_config.hpp:54:0,
                 from /usr/include/boost/date_time/c_time.hpp:21,
                 from /usr/include/boost/date_time/time_clock.hpp:16,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/thread_time.hpp:9,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/locks.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/mutex.hpp:16,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/thread_data.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread.hpp:13,
                 from util.h:26,
                 from bignum.h:12,
                 from main.h:9,
                 from db.h:9,
                 from net.cpp:7:
/usr/include/boost/cstdint.hpp:311:42: note:                 typedef boost::ulong_long_type boost::uint64_t
      typedef  ::boost::ulong_long_type   uint64_t;
                                          ^
net.cpp:408:39: error: expected primary-expression before ‘struct’
 int GetExternalIPbySTUN(uint64_t rnd, struct sockaddr_in *mapped, const char **srv);
                                       ^
net.cpp:408:67: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’
 int GetExternalIPbySTUN(uint64_t rnd, struct sockaddr_in *mapped, const char **srv);
                                                                   ^
net.cpp:408:83: error: expression list treated as compound expression in initializer [-fpermissive]
 int GetExternalIPbySTUN(uint64_t rnd, struct sockaddr_in *mapped, const char **srv);
                                                                                   ^
net.cpp: In function ‘bool GetMyExternalIP_STUN(CNetAddr&)’:
net.cpp:413:3: error: reference to ‘uint64_t’ is ambiguous
   uint64_t rnd = GetRand(~0LL);
   ^
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/include/stdint.h:9:0,
                 from /usr/include/inttypes.h:27,
                 from uint256.h:11,
                 from util.h:33,
                 from bignum.h:12,
                 from main.h:9,
                 from db.h:9,
                 from net.cpp:7:
/usr/include/stdint.h:55:27: note: candidates are: typedef long unsigned int uint64_t
 typedef unsigned long int uint64_t;
                           ^
In file included from /usr/include/boost/date_time/compiler_config.hpp:54:0,
                 from /usr/include/boost/date_time/c_time.hpp:21,
                 from /usr/include/boost/date_time/time_clock.hpp:16,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/thread_time.hpp:9,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/locks.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/mutex.hpp:16,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/pthread/thread_data.hpp:12,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread/thread.hpp:17,
                 from /usr/include/boost/thread.hpp:13,
                 from util.h:26,
                 from bignum.h:12,
                 from main.h:9,
                 from db.h:9,
                 from net.cpp:7:
/usr/include/boost/cstdint.hpp:311:42: note:                 typedef boost::ulong_long_type boost::uint64_t
      typedef  ::boost::ulong_long_type   uint64_t;
                                          ^
net.cpp:413:12: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘rnd’
   uint64_t rnd = GetRand(~0LL);
            ^
net.cpp:415:32: error: ‘rnd’ was not declared in this scope
   int rc = GetExternalIPbySTUN(rnd, &mapped, &srv);
                                ^
net.cpp:415:50: error: ‘GetExternalIPbySTUN’ cannot be used as a function
   int rc = GetExternalIPbySTUN(rnd, &mapped, &srv);
                                                  ^
make: *** [obj/net.o] Error 1

EvgenijM86

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

We have tried to fix it in a patch just now. Can you do "git pull" from master branch, try compilation again and tell us how it went?

Source is located here - https://github.com/EvgenijM86/emercoin

ice00

sr. member

Activity: 296

Merit: 250

Quote from: EvgenijM86 on March 21, 2015, 08:08:36 AM

#include
#include
#include
#include

If you do have them, then this is more puzzling than I thought...

here my headers:

/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/socket.h
/usr/include/netinet/in.h
/usr/include/arpa/inet.h
/usr/include/netdb.h
/usr/include/gssrpc/netdb.h
/usr/include/mit-krb5/gssrpc/netdb.h
/usr/include/rpc/netdb.h
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/netdb.h

However changing the order of compilation in makefile did not fix the compilation errors.

Topic: [EMC] EMERCOIN — Blockchain Service Platform. PoS&PoW | BTC merge-mined - page 96. (Read 393776 times)