Which is why I only threw in 0.01 BTC to begin with. Most of the complaints here are just hot air. The coin, in my opinion, is just fine the way it is, but the rework to DGW is only going to make it better, so I"m good with it. I'm fine mining after the multipools have their way with it since that's when I get a bigger percentage of every block find. I mined during the lead up to the first fork which was terribly slow for a lot of people. Not that I have a lot of scrypt hash power - far from it. I doubled my power with my 5-chip gridseed purchase.
At any rate, if people don't want the coin changed enough to donate something, then leave it the way it is.
True and I agree with you. And this is precisely what will happen-- if we don't get sufficient donations, then the coin will remain. It will be forked once a developer accepts the amount of donations provided. I have been quoted a price of 2btc, but I think I can get it done for half that.
This method of donation for the payment to the fork developer was done to invite the contributions of the community, since money speaks the loudest. I noticed the complainers went away in any event.
The real RonPaulCoin followers are still with us though.
Thanks, TechByPC, for supporting this coin from the beginning.
^ I thought the same thing as this, but then I realized there is actually an exploitable flaw (since the advent of multi pools). The flaw allows those with lots of mining power to take them rapdily at low difficulty levels and then leaving and selling them off. This devalues the coin every 48 blocks and is part of the reason for the dropped price. These miners profit more because they got lots of coins at an easier difficulty rate when everyone else had to work twice as hard to get the same amount.
If you are a buyer of RPC then this means you get an awesome deal and you can stock up (I bought a couple hundred when they were around $1-$2 each). But we also want the value to go up and I strongly feel it will, once this "hole in the bag" is fixed.