We have this saying in Holland...
"When the cat leaves home, the mice dance on the table"...
What do you have in mind?
For architecture Kepler and Maxwell, my miner shows a greater speed than yours. Pascal is a little less.
770-18.5
660-10.5+
970-21
1070-31
I installed GTX 660 3072mb I propose to carry out the test. Connect to eg, dwarpool at 24 hours, with my miner and your miner and see how many share acept...
I have nothing in mind, I was just being cynical. To be honest I don't know anymore how fast my miner is, the only thing I know is how
free it is.
you have donate...
I can't put a devfee on what is partially other's people work (or IP for that matter). Even if I could, I wouldn't consider myself seasoned enough in this scene to try. You need to build up quite some credits for large groups of people to move over to a closed source fee miner, even if is faster.
If I were you, I'd release a really free version of your miner that is exactly as fast as mine or Clay's or whatever is the baseline these days. Then if they figure it is stable enough and they like the additional features, they can switch to your faster version and pay the fee. But it has to be faster first. You are 1% behind by default
Admittedly it is a bit annoying to see the donations almost dried up (with the exception of some real supporters) when Claymore hit the market, and while I'm away for two months, 2 CUDA eth miners with a devfee are launched (yours and Clay's v6). But on the other hand, it actually is about time I start doing something else
