Topic: ethminer-0.9.41-genoil-1.1 - page 15. (Read 397363 times)

Set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the directory where the lib is located.

oh i didn't see that mention, will reread the entire thread to look for that, i dug soooo deep in the cmake files man, like three hours and found nothing, well actually i found a lot of things, that allowed me to compile it on 16.04 just doesn't wanna link ...for now... hehe.

i'll keep digging  
thanks for answer me!.
cheers
indkt.

Not sure m8, my Linux is pretty bad, but cant you change a makefile to use that renamed Json lib? I remember somebody mentioning this earlier

Hi Genoil, sorry to bother you, i know you are on something else, i have been working on it all day and i can't figure it out
maybe you can give me a hint.

I am trying to compile ethminer 1.1.7 on lubuntu 16.04 (kopiemtu 3.0), i went as far as sucessfuly compile it (cuda only), but it is not linking, it throws a TON of JSON errors like that:

i am not sure if it has something to do with the library libjson-rpc-cpp-dev which on lubuntu 16.04 is called libjsonrpccpp-dev
the older one does not exists.

perhaps is on a different path, can you give me a hint of what causes that, so i can keep digging? because i've been all day on it and i am stuck!.

thanks a lot!
indkt.

You need to use the BIOS mod. That will increase the VRam performance and can get you 27MH/s.

hi
is there something to do on sapphire rx470 4G 1216mhz gpu 1750mem  ? i only get 21.3mh
i tryed oc ram and/or gpu but best result are at stock speed
if i oc the ram it drop speed and 2000 is to high
 

it s to expensive for only 21mh  when the r9 380 get 20.5 mh and 20% cheaper

and why the hell when mining expense r3 380 or rx470 get same speed than eth

and an r9 270 does 12mh on eth and 19 on exp ?    i don't understand that the r9 270 get mostly same speed as 380 & rx470

Hi,

is there anybody, who succesfully compiled ethminer under Ubuntu 16.04.1 and Cuda 8.0 ?
I'm using gcc-4.9, and I have some errors yet...

THE FIRST CARD I GOT WORKING WAS AN HD 5670--

When I put the HD 5670 to work with Genoil's early Ethminer, I got similar results.  It mined at about 4MH/s.  It was in the same league as a GTX 550ti when mining scrypt, about 100kh/s.  The HD 5670 barely generated statistics on NanoPool, the only open pool at the time.  

The GTX 550ti will never mine ETH, and I don't expect the HD 5670 to mine much faster than 4MH/s with Dagger-Hashimoto, even if mining Expanse (EXP).  A GTX 750ti once mined ETH at about 8MH/s before the DAG became too large.  It outperformed the GTX 550ti by almost 2.5X when mining scrypt.  I reason that an HD 5670 is performing in its capacity if mining Ethereum at 4MH/s.  A good experiment would be to mine EXP with your HD5XXX.  The DAG is smaller, and may be small enough to be mined with a GTX 750ti at 7 to 8MH/s.  Expanse is on Epoch 13, Ethereum is on Epoch 79.  There is a lower network hash rate for Expanse, and a lower difficulty.

A GTX 960 hashes at 10MH/s, a GTX 970 hashes at 20MH/s, and an R9 280X hashes at 17.5MH/s when overclocked, all when mining Ethereum (ETH).  The R9 280X will mine Expanse (EXP) at almost 25MH/s, this is the rate you read about in older reports about mining ETH.  I reason you could put your HD 5XXX card(s) to good use mining EXP.

If you want to buy my HD 5670, let me know, the price won't be too high.  An HD 5XXX rig could sit quietly in the corner mining EXP for a long time, and the blocks are 8 coins big.       --scryptr

Is there any special build for AMD Ati Radeon HD 5xxx series (Cypress) 2gb RAM because I have only 4mhs on it ...

How do I mine in stratum mode using Genoil for dwarfpool? Their instructions on their website are for ethminer. Can I actually use the same commands?

Have you tried my linux build?
https://github.com/nerdralph/ethminer-nr/tree/110/releases

Are you taking part in the Zcash (ZEC) public open source mining software contest - ends 27th October?

£10,000 prize for GPU miner
£10,000 prize for CPU miner

And, £10,000 in prizes going to the runners up?

Did you check the effective hash rate on the pool? They might be the same or a bit higher. It depends on the card.

Try to mine Expanse or so

I get great performance out of my 280x with other algorithms.  In fact, my 280x outperforms my 290s in some cases and I can lower the voltage to save on power consumption.  I've been in the crypto mining thing for almost 3 years now so I have gotten a lot out of all of my GPUs.  This stuff is evolving.  While the 280x may not be a great performer with ethash, it may work better with the next algorithm to come along or a profitable groestl or X11 coin if there are any left.

it is possible to add a command to reboot the system in case of disconnection?

Hi guys!

Is anybody here mining with AMD Fury, non X version and possibly Sapphire manufacturer, I'm interested in the hash rate you're getting...

I'm mining with 2x Sapphire 390x - core 1080, mem 1500 mhz both --cl-local-work 256 --cl-global-work 16384
getting around 28 mh/s per card

win7 x64 crimson 16.7.3.
16GB ddr3, AMD FX 4170

Cheers!

Same here, I get about 16 MH/s with genoil on a 280x but only 14.9 with sgminer-gm same settings (1000,1500). 

It is ok. I have xfx 280x and I have about 16 mhs

Hello
I had to revert to version 1.1.7 of the AMD compiled miner because version 1.1.9 generates A LOT of STALE SHARES on miningpoolhub
the weird thing is that you don't see it on the miner as rejected but the stats on the pool went haywire since i updated to 1.1.9, go back to 1.1.7 and everything back to normal.

windows 7 64 bit, 8GB ram, AMD 5350 APU, 3x MSI R9 280X, standard clocks, -80mV VRM
anyone experienced the same?

the linux version directly is impossible to compile it on lubuntu 14.04, I think that maybe will work with never versions of gcc, make, etc, so i will install the new lubuntu 16, try again and post results and procedure.